Categories
Canada Electoral Politics

CuckFight 2022: I missed the First Puppet Debate

I’ve introduced you to the six chosen cucklets who hashed it out in Edmonton on May 6th for the CPC leadership debates. Remember, these six career politicians are already astroturfed. Three semi-legitimate candidates were shut out by the CPC election commission, and similar things happened last time around. 

This debate promised to be a boring and tedious affair, which is why I honestly just forgot about it until now. However, I guess I have to write about it, so here’s what happened.

And more specifically…

CBC:

Conservative leadership candidates took the stage Wednesday in Edmonton for what turned into an unorthodox, wide-ranging debate that featured discussions about the war in Ukraine, abortion and supply management — with detours on the topics of binge-worthy TV shows and the candidates’ current reading lists.

There’s a lot of nothing important that happened. Part of my job is to tell you that, and give you some examples. But after a while it gets tedious. So just trust me, nothing of importance was said by anybody.

Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre, the perceived front-runner in the contest to replace Erin O’Toole, focused most of his speaking time on economic issues, the cost of living and surging inflation figures.

As prime minister, Poilievre said he would replace Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem, who he accused of acting as the federal government’s “ATM,” which has driven inflation and made life unaffordable for many Canadians.

Oh FFS. This guy whined that the Bank of Canada wasn’t independent enough from the government of Canada. So now he’s campaigning on putting his guy in charge of it. This is stupid and meaningless.

Charest said Poilievre’s promise to fire Macklem was “irresponsible” and would make companies second-guess their investments in Canada.

After the debate, Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis said: “I don’t agree that members of Parliament should be meddling in the Bank of Canada.” 

Leslyn Lewis

The Black Lady is right, Pierre. And so is the Charest-fag. Well actually they’re not right, because fuck the Bank of Canada. I just want to point out again that Poilievre is doing this weird watered down Ron Paul routine, where he loves central banking he just thinks it should be completely undemocratic. It’s really stupid.

Candidates generally agreed on the need to bolster Canada’s energy and resources sector by building more pipelines.

Above is Scott Aitchison. I’m sure he’s got a chance.

On the candidates’ support for the freedom convoy protests, Charest accused Poilievre of simultaneously denouncing illegal blockades while more broadly supporting protests against pandemic restrictions and vaccine mandates.

“Mr. Poilieivre is very conveniently rewriting history tonight. The fact of the matter is that he did support illegal blockades,” Charest said.

I’m honestly wondering if Jean Charest isn’t simply there to make Poilievre look good by comparison. He’s basically Reddit Runs For Office.

In a section on cryptocurrency and its potential role in helping Canadians weather the effects of inflation, Brown accused Poilievre of misleading Canadians through “late-night YouTube videos” in which he championed the benefits of cryptocurrencies.

Patrick Brown

I can’t even remember what Scott Aitchison is even supposed to have been doing before. but Patrick Brown is a creepy sex pest who wants the Conservative Party to be even more anti-White. Sorry, more “big tent.” Having said that, his burn on Poilievre is pretty solid here. If I was up on that stage I’d be roasting Dollar Store Ron Paul pretty much constantly.

Poilievre, for his part, attacked Charest as a phony Conservative with a long track record of raising taxes and painted Brown as a politically motivated operator who has changed positions on numerous issues during his career in federal and provincial politics.

See, the thing is, when these fags criticize each other, they’re usually right. Their criticisms are also really gay, and not incisive, which is by design. So this entire debate is just a fagfest through and through.

As another example, there’s this little video the CBC puts of the two cucks, Patrick Brown and Pierre Poilievre, having a real cuckfight on Ukraine.

Some Propagandist: Do you support creating a no fly zone over Ukraine?

Patrick Brown: Yes. I believe Canada should push and actively advocate and be part of it and show that NATO is gonna be serious about policing encroachment. We need to stand steadfast with our allies in Ukraine.

Pierre Poilievre: No, but I believe we should provide more lethal weapons to our Canadian allies.

They go back and forth for the next two minutes. Patrick Brown stumbles over his words, and is basically an unreal fag. Poilievre points out, correctly, that a No Fly Zone could escalate to a war with Russia. I would have pointed out that Canada enforcing a No Fly Zone over Russia might be just about the LARPiest shit imaginable, and bantzed the two of them off the stage. But of course, we’re not invited on stage.

On abortion, all candidates except Lewis indicated either said they are pro-choice or that they would not introduce legislation on abortion as prime minister. Charest jumped on Poilievre after the Ontario MP did not definitively describe himself as pro-choice.

“On this issue can we be clear on one thing? Every candidate in this race needs to tell the women of Canada where they stand, whether they’re pro or against,” Charest said. “And Mr. Poilievre’s answer quite frankly does not fit that test.”

What Charest just did is like fake and gay, but true and gay instead. Yes, it’s true that Pierre Poilievre, as a conman, wants to pretend to pro-life advocates that maybe, just maybe, he might think about one day potentially giving them some policy. This is a con, and he needs to be called out on it. Except that Charest does this whiny neo-feminist “I believe that wahmens need to know, you pig,” line of attack and it’s so gay it makes me wonder what I’m doing with my life that I’m even covering these people.

Poilievre said he believes in “freedom of choice on the issue.”

The hell is that supposed to mean? Are you pro-abortion or not you duplicitous fag.

Ontario MP Scott Aitchison, as he did in last week’s unofficial debate, appealed to voters as a reasonable, calm potential leader and promised to end the “politics of division.

First of all, CBC, you forgot the closing quotation marks. You’re a big boy propaganda agency, you can’t be doing that. Secondly, Aitchison? This fag? Yeah only because everyone in Canada is going to be united in thinking he’s a gross weirdo.

Lewis said she would build bridges and repair the distrust in Canadian politics. She also railed against “woke-ism and cancel culture.”

Thanks, Leslyn. Maybe you should start with the woke-ism in the Conservative Party.

And the “cancel culture,” that lead to three normal people being mysteriously barred from running in the election.

Former Ontario MPP Roman Baber focused his pitch to party members on his credentials as a voice against vaccine mandates and pandemic restrictions, a position that caused his removal from the Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservative caucus. He said Canada must “end 21st century segregation and let people make their own medical decisions.”

Right. This is the same Roman Baber who has denounced the vicious scourge known as BDS stickers.

I’m sure he’ll get right on ending segregation in Israel any minute now.

While the debate mostly focused on policy issues, the candidates were also asked during a section of lightning round questioning about lighter topics, including about their political heroes, the most recent TV shows they’ve binged and the books they’re currently reading.

Please, make it stop.

Poilievre said he’s reading the book 12 Rules for Life by the Canadian writer and psychologist Jordan Peterson, who has generated controversy by his hardline stances against identity politics and gender issues.

No. We are not pretending that Juden Peterstein is some sort of hardline ideologue. This is a guy who is literally promoted by the YouTube algorithm. He’s just a weirdo deradicalizer who sucks at his job.

“I think he has a lot of good wisdom in that book that could help anybody,” Poilievre said.

Yeah, like how you need to clean your room. I think anyone can benefit from that advice.

And that anybody included Mr. Peterstein.

Brown and Lewis named the Netflix series Ozark and Bridgerton, respectively, as the shows they were most recently hooked on. 

I am so out of the loop, that I honestly thought that Ozark and Bridgerton was the name of the show, rather than two shows. But really, Netflix is utter trash. It’s hot garbage. It’s not like I need to force myself to not subscribe, I don’t want Netflix, and can’t remember the last time I watched it.

Candidates will meet again on May 25 in Montreal for a French-language debate before resuming campaigns that will run for nearly the entire summer.

That’s it, that was the whole debate.

No further official debates are scheduled, although the party says it is reserving the right to organize a third debate in late August.

So there’s going to be another cuckfight in late May. 

Conservative members will vote for their third permanent leader of the past five years at a convention on Sept. 10.

And then three and a half months later, the CPC leadership will decide, behind closed doors, who the actual puppet is.

Why not hold these elections right after the debates? Well, they’re hedging their bets in case one of these weirdos actually performed well, and so the peasants got mad that he got fucked over. Don’t want another Bernier situation, now do we?

NOTE: The top commenter on the CBC piece, Greg Stanford, actually make a good point, which I’ll filter.

Honestly I’d copy Biden’s tactics if I was the CCP…..pick anyone, hide them in the basement until the election, and just contrast dang near every position Justin took in 2015 to his 180 today, and just let people get even more sick of Justin while the CCP candidate hides in a basement. Worked to beat Trump, and that’s the closest comparison to Trudeau….a guy who nobody really likes except their most devoted base who will bend and reject reality to keep them a saint in their eyes.

Ignoring “muh CCP,” stuff, there’s something to this analysis. It’s not that hard to run against Trudeau. You can literally throw his old campaign promises in his face, like a competitive fly off, prop rep, and ending oil subsidies. But none of these puppets are interested, because their donors aren’t interested.

Categories
Canada Electoral Politics

CuckFight 2022: Every Cuckservative in the Nation Throws his little Cuck Hat in the Ring

CTV:

Pierre Poilievre knows how to laugh. I heard it myself.

On Monday Poilievre was asked to react to Jean Charest’s “attack,” calling him a career politician with no real life experience. Poilievre let out a belly laugh and simply remarked that Charest was elected to Parliament in…1984!

Charest may have lots of skills today but he didn’t have two lines on his CV when he was first elected. For him to be calling Poilievre a career politician was indeed laughable.

Tom Mulcair

This article is written by Tom Mulcair, the former leader of the federal NDP from 2012-2017. You’d think he’d be taking potshots at “the other side,” in this article, but, since electoral politics is completely fake and ghey, he’s not. That’s why the tone of this piece is cheerful and praising.

The race to become the sixth Conservative leader in seven years is shaping up to be a lot more fun than the previous races that produced Scheer and O’Toole as cannon fodder for Trudeau’s Liberals.

Who could forget Scheer the Queer. The most homosexual faggot in congress was the chosen cucklet destined to lose against The Spoilt Cunt Formerly Known as Justin.

To begin with, Poilievre is young, energetic and driven. That will serve him well over the next six months as he traverses the country constantly. I went through a lengthy campaign to succeed Jack Layton and know first hand just how gruelling the exercise is. Canada is indeed huge and in a leadership race, you have to get into every nook and cranny to meet, greet and sell memberships.

Yes, who can forget Pierre Pollievre, the career politician with a heart of gold, who’s bravely taking on the elites. Now. All of a sudden. Like, he’s spent his entire working life doing things for his donors, but he’s really against them all of a sudden.

Poilievre was in Quebec last weekend and did well. When you get 200 people in a hall in Trois-Rivières, you’ve generated some interest in your campaign.

He hold this in a synagogue?

Poilievre doesn’t shy away from controversy and when asked about meeting anti-vaxxers, reverts to a “good people on both sides” argument.

The cuckletservative party is having an epic battle, mirroring in scale and casualties the Russia-Ukraine war in the Donbas. No, more than that. This is at least Vietnam, and probably more like Korea. Fuck it, I think we’re going all the way to Napoleonesque mass starvation deaths in the masturbation camps of Auschwitz. 

The battle is for the future of the cuckletservative party, nay, the cuckletservative spirit. The question they are having is, fundamentally, are they going to be a party that pretends to be token opposition to Neo-Fuedal Bolshevekism or are they just not even going to pretend to be here to do a single thing for the little peasants. A vote for Pollievre is a vote for pretend milquetoast populism, a vote for Charest is a vote for just being more honest about sucking donor cocks dry. 

It’s a really important battle. You should be very invested in this.

Poilievre will be able to count on a lot of second choice votes from Leslyn Lewis supporters. She is staunchly anti-abortion and will reel in large numbers of votes from social conservatives and some church groups. If she fails to progress through the successive ballot counts, most of her votes would stay on the right side of the ledger and favour Poilievre, who gets a political two for one. He’ll get her votes but won’t have to get ensnared in the trap that caught Scheer. Unlike Scheer, Poilievre will be able to avoid committing too heavily and won’t have to pander to the anti-choice voters.

You mean “do what the pro-life voters want”, right faggot? This has got to be one of the lamest attempts at reframing I have ever read.

Also, note how he’s literally pointing out, if you read between the lines, that Pollievre is cynically doing the “muh lesser of two evils,” inside of the cuckletservative party. He’s not anti-abortion, he just wants you to think that. And no, goy, you’re not getting policy here, so what’s the point.

Poilievre will be able to count on a lot of second choice votes from Leslyn Lewis supporters. She is staunchly anti-abortion and will reel in large numbers of votes from social conservatives and some church groups. If she fails to progress through the successive ballot counts, most of her votes would stay on the right side of the ledger and favour Poilievre, who gets a political two for one. He’ll get her votes but won’t have to get ensnared in the trap that caught Scheer. Unlike Scheer, Poilievre will be able to avoid committing too heavily and won’t have to pander to the anti-choice voters.

Maxime Bernier is a gigantic faggot, who still has a twatter account because he’s a fake populist. Having said that, there’s no question in my mind that he won the Cuckletservative nomination, which is why they literally burned the ballots the day after the election. And that was in addition to getting huge turnout from some farmers who were angry about Bernier’s planned cancellation of the Wheat and Dairy boards.

What will be the most interesting to watch is who aligns with whom.

Tom Mulcair, again.

I actually unironically agree with this. This little cuckfight is going to be entertaining, and I’m going to be enjoying every second of this. I’m also going to be covering it in excruciating detail, for political ammunition of course.

When MP Scott Aitchison launched his campaign he said he was running because he was fed up with partisan bickering and political games and said what was missing was leadership. One can be forgiven for assuming that the master stuntman, Pierre Poilievre, was in Aitchison’s crosshairs.

MP Scott Aitchison.

Why is every little cuckservative a soy-faced monstrosity? Why are they all so ugly, and yet, not in like a masculine way. I’m not even gay but jesus help me.

This race really is a battle for the heart and soul of a Janus-faced Party and the past leaders of its two philosophical sides could help decide its future. If and when Brian Mulroney and Stephen Harper declare, that battle will have been joined in earnest.

Stephen Harper is expected to declare? This is turning into a clusterfuck of epic proportions. 

And wait a second, Brian Mulroney? Wasn’t he that guy who was PM in, like, 1984???

This goy reminds me of the pedo pope…

He’s 83 years old. This has to be satire, right? This Mulcair fag is just pulling our legs. That has to be it.

Charest would love to get Mulroney’s support and be seen as his potential successor in forming a majority Conservative government. Their relationship has not always been an easy one and it remains to be seen whether the old warhorse can be prevailed upon by their many mutual, and influential, friends to give his paternal blessing.

Oh, okay. So he’s just throwing around his “support,” then. That makes more sense. Let’s see who else this faggot has supported.

So this complete and utter whore for the (((parasite class))) is bragging about helping Joffrey Trudeau. And this is someone who these little cucklets are just thrilled about being endorsed by.

This would be a lot more confusing if you didn’t understand that they all simply exist to serve their donors.

Harper is another matter. His disdain not only for Charest but for all that he represents is a matter of record. Harper scuppered the Progressive Conservatives because they were an anathema. The mushy middle is not for him. Harper is unlikely to remain silent, especially if it appears that Charest has a chance of beating Poilievre.

True Blue Stephen Harper. Remember him. You know, that guy who, uh, tripled immigration and did literally nothing socially “conservative,” in his entire tenure? You remember, right?

Another major leadership candidate, Patrick Brown scored a major coup when he received the backing of highly respected MP Michelle Rempel Garner. Deeply experienced, brilliant in debate and highly personable, she will bring a lot to his campaign. She can be expected to help Brown with his communications lines and in debate prep.

Michelle Rempel Garner, MP – Conservative

Hmmm. I distinctly remember writing about this anti-White cunt on my previous site. Let me see if I remember –

Right. Here’s a highly respected Conservative Party MP pushing anti-White hate propaganda, as well as using terms like “cis/straight.” Let me go ahead and transcribe that for you.

Yes. I humble myself and ask forgiveness, and seek to make things right.

I have privilege; I am cis/straight/white. But I am also a woman who works in a system dominated by white maleness.

But no excuses. I will do what I can. That is all I can do, but it is much.

Patrick Brown

Imagine a political party where they’re tripping over themselves to get the endorsements of faggots who help Justin Trudeau for free, as well as anti-White human garbage pronoun warriors like Michelle Rempel Garner. Well, you don’t have to imagine anymore.

Tuesday’s agreement between Trudeau and Singh would put the next federal election in October 2025.

It creates a double advantage for Poilievre. He gets to slag the Liberals for turning “hard left” and, if he wins, he gets three years to hone his pitch in the House and prepare.

I’m sure Charest quickly understood what the Liberal-NDP agreement meant for him. I’m willing to bet the Liberal braintrust took it into account when they pushed for this deal.

I’m sure Charest quickly understood what the Liberal-NDP agreement meant for him. I’m willing to bet the Liberal braintrust took it into account when they pushed for this deal.

Charest doesn’t even have a seat in the House. He’d be stuck spending three and a half years roaming the hallways like Banquo’s ghost. Not a great career plan for someone banking on a quick shot at becoming PM. He’s an incredible campaigner and no one should count him out, but this isn’t what he’d bargained for.

Jean Charest

Finally Tom Mulcair has an actual insight that isn’t coated in a layer of soy. It is logistically difficult for Charest. This faggot has to just sort of chill for four years if he wins the nomination, and just kind of do nothing for a while. Pollievre can do the Trey Gowdy “gettin’ to da bottom o’ dis,” routine while never getting to da bottom o’ that. He’s in the perfect position for a servative. He gets to whine a lot, while ultimately not having to push forward policy.

Look, I don’t know about you, but I’m pumped.

Categories
Electoral Politics

Another Spritually Homosexual Conservative Announces his Leadership Candidacy

CBC:

Jean Charest, the former Premier of Quebec, will be a candidate to succeed Erin O’Toole as leader of the Conservative Party of Canada.

He will make the official announcement on Thursday, two sources confirmed to Radio-Canada.

Earlier Monday, he won the endorsement of columnist Tasha Kheiriddin, who will not be running.

Kheiriddin was one of the anticipated candidates for the Conservative leadership race, but after careful consideration and discussions with Charest, she said he is best placed to advance their shared vision for the party.

Tasha Kheiriddin

I covered the whimpy candidacy announcement speech of Pierre Pollievre. Who has since gone on to endorse George Soros’ talking points on Ukraine. Needless to say I do not have high hopes for this Jean Charest, or anyone else tangentially involved with the CPC.

She said the decision not to run was difficult but necessary, “so that we can really rebuild this big [Conservative] tent.”

“There is no point in dividing our electorate or membership,” she said in French. “So that we have a chance of succeeding in advancing the party in that direction.”

Ms. GumSmile here wants the CPC to be a “big tent” party. That means being super anti-White and perverted, even more so than the previous cuck leader.

Prospective candidates have until June 3 to enter the race. The party will declare its new leader on September 10.

I’ll be covering these shills as they announce their candidacies, and have their little catfights. Which puppet wins is unimportant, I just want to show how utterly fake and ghey the Servative Party of Canada truly is.