Categories
Anti-White Canada Clownworld

Canadian ClownWorld Expedition 1 – My Name is Two Dogs Fucking Elementary, Kys and Don’t Tell, No Bully Propagandists, and Shove the Foreigners in the Military

First, an Eebil HuWhyte Man’s name must be stricken from an elementary school.

Globo News:

An elementary school in Vancouver has become the latest to replace its name with an Indigenous one, as governments and communities work to decolonize public places.

Let me guess, they came up with a retarded name that no one can pronounce.

Sir Matthew Begbie Elementary School’s new name, wək̓ʷan̓əs tə syaqʷəm, was unveiled in a ceremony Friday with the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam) First Nation on Friday.

So were they mad that a White Man’s name was on something, or this White Man in particular?

Speaking at the ceremony, Elder Larry Grant asked students and staff to look up Sir Matthew Begbie, the first Supreme Court judge in British Columbia, also known as the “Hanging Judge.”

In 1864, Begbie pronounced death sentences for five Tsilhqot’in men found guilty of murder by a jury of white men. The Tsilhqot’in leaders had defended their territories from the settlers of the day, who sought land and gold, refused to pay their people for labour, and brought them close to starvation.

Looks like a bit of both. Begbie announced the execution of five Tsilhqot’in’s, but why were they on trial? The Canadian Encyclopedia has more on this particular event.

Canadian Encyclopedia:

In 1861, a pack-train trail was established from the Bella Coola Valley through Tsilhqot’in territory to the developing gold mine centres to the east, and work was begun on a wagon road from Bute Inlet to the interior. Resisting these intrusions, a small group of Tsilhqot’in killed several workers on this road in what is known as the Chilcotin War of 1864. Six Tsilhqot’in were eventually tried and executed for these killings. On 26 March 2018, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau exonerated the Tsilhqot’in chiefs of any wrongdoing, and on 2 November 2018, Trudeau formally apologized.

So they murdered “several” workers. Their names are not given, although we know them to be White. In response, six war chiefs were themselves hanged after a trial. These anti-Whites pretend this is some sort of grave injustice, and are blaming Judge Matthew Begbie.

And by the way, I did what “Elder Larry Grant” told me to do and looked up Sir Matthew Begbie, also known as “the Hanging Judge.” And yes, I noticed his name is Larry Grant, but these people’s identities have been jokes for a while now and we have to step over that today.

Wikipedia for Judge Matthew Begbie:

In 1860, Begbie found a white Californian man by the name of William Marshall guilty of assaulting a First Nations man based only on the testimony of First Nations people, the first time this had ever occurred. Begbie learned a number of Indigenous dialects and even conducted trials in those languages without the use of an interpreter. He had great friendships with a number of chiefs and he was clearly sympathetic when it came to trying to impose colonial law on Indigenous people. He recognized the concept of Aboriginal marriage and allowed an oath for truth telling that recognized Aboriginal beliefs. Begbie, a 19th-century Scotsman (born in colonial Mauritius), truly believed in the Scottish Enlightenment values of egalitarianism when it came to understanding and interacting with Aboriginal peoples. He allowed people of other cultures to swear an oath of truth on an object sacred to them in place of the Bible.

Far from being that EXTREME ARYAN SUPREEEEEMACIST that these anti-Whites are portraying him as, Begbie was respectful and even sympathetic to these people. 

Begbie ruled in 1886 that a law imposing very high licence fees discriminated against Chinese people even though it did not mention them, because laundries at the time were overwhelmingly run by Chinese. Another ruling with a similar logic two years later compelled the city of Victoria to renew the licences of Chinese pawnbrokers.[9]

Judge Matthew Begbie

Actually he was a great example of a condescending and somewhat anti-White judge. What does this proto-globalist get for his efforts? Slander from the Globo Homo Schlomo Enjoyers of today. Thus is the reward for all of these types.

Now back to the Globo News article.

For thousands of years, Musqueam people spoke hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓, but according to Chief yəχʷyaχʷələq (Wayne Sparrow), there are no more fluent speakers in the nation.

Chief Wayne Sparrow teams up with Elder Larry Grant, neither of whom speak Musqueam, to give an elementary school that is mostly full of Asians a Musqueam name after pretending that the murder of multiple White People was something good and great and those responsible shouldn’t have been punished. Then they go and slap the new name on so shoddily that it’s clearly at a downward angle, but everyone involved pretends not to notice this.

Across Canada, a number of schools, parks, public buildings and street names have changed to dissociate from colonizing figures linked with racism, hatred and violence, particularly directed towards First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples. Various statues have been torn down as well.

Vancouver’s former Trutch Street in Kitsilano, for example, was recently renamed Musqueamview Street in English and šxʷməθkʷəy̓əmasəm in hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓. The old Village of Queen Charlotte also reverted to its ancestral name, Daajing Giids, in July. On Vancouver Island, a group of Grade 4 students successfully lobbied the provincial government to change ‘John Dean Provincial Park’ to ȽÁU,WELṈEW̱.

Remember everyone, you should be really angry that the all expenses paid boarding schools that Aboriginals demanded we build and fund for them are cultural genocide factories because children were taught how to read and do math. Oh but them tearing down our statues, renaming our schools, and cancelling our national holiday? Well that’s not cultural genocide. Also it is, and you deserve it.

Daily Mail:

A disabled veteran in Canada has slammed her government for offering to euthanize her when she grew frustrated at delays in having a wheelchair lift installed in her home.

Retired Army Corporal Christine Gauthier, a former Paralympian, testified in Parliament on Thursday that a Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) caseworker made the assisted suicide offer.

After years of frustrating delays in getting the home lift, Gauthier says the caseworker told her: ‘Madam, if you are really so desperate, we can give you medical assistance in dying now.’

‘I was like, ‘I can’t believe that you will … give me an injection to help me die, but you will not give me the tools I need to help me live,” she said. ‘It was really shocking to hear that kind of comment.’ 

Christine Gauthier is far from the only veteran who was told to kill herself by the Canadian Government.

CBC:

Four — perhaps even five — Canadian military veterans were given the option of medically-assisted death (MAID) by a now-suspended Veterans Affairs Canada caseworker, the country’s veterans minister told a House of Commons committee late Thursday.

Lawrence MacAulay said the matter is now being turned over to the RCMP for investigation and his department’s internal review is ongoing.

“We expect all Veterans Affairs candidate employees to interact with veterans with care, compassion and respect and the actions of this one employee is simply disgusting,” MacAulay told the veterans affairs committee. “And I condemn this behaviour in the strongest terms.”

He went on to say there was “no way to justify” the actions and he wasn’t about to defend the employee.

What employee? Tell me xir’s name you faggot.

I know it’s obvious, but the reason why he’s not giving us the name is that he doesn’t want us to know. This isn’t protected information. If the RCMP is doing an investigation then he could tell us who they are investigating. But he won’t, probably because it’s some purple haired tranny who looks like a demon and that might get the peasants upset. So instead, they’ll make some noise about how it was “unacceptable” to tell a bunch of veterans to go kill themselves and move on. Nothing will come of this, and duplicitous weasel Pierre Poilievre will not make an issue of this.

Carleton:

Carleton University’s journalism program is partnering with CBC/Radio-Canada, the #NotOK project and the Stursberg family to hold a major public event on Dec. 1 grappling with the upsurge in targeted online abuse facing journalists, especially women journalists of colour.

Journalists and online hate: What to do when the battlefield is everywhere will feature presentations from media executives, journalists and at least one politician on how best to confront the corrosive force of online hate targeted at journalists.

Now, Carleton is working together with the CBC/Radio-Canada,  #NotOk and the Stursberg family on this major public event on Dec. 1 that will continue this dialogue, examine best practise[sic] and hopefully bring us closer to identifying how best to respond. Richard Stursberg and Judith Lawrie, the children of the late journalist Peter Stursberg, established an endowment at the School of Journalism and Communication in memory of their father to support both the Peter Stursberg Foreign Correspondents Lecture and the Peter Stursberg Award in Conflict Journalism and Media Studies. The Dec. 1 event will also be supported by the Stursberg endowment.

Elie Cantin-Nantel decided to show up to this event in person and live tweet about it. I’m not even going to provide commentary. It speaks for itself. Just skim through the bold.

Elie Cantin-Nantel Threadreader App:

Carleton journalism head Allan Thompson opens the event, warns that it will contain “harsh disturbing language.” He does a land acknowledgment, and says he is conscious as a “fifth generation settler”. Says journalists must challenge and dismantle white supremacist mindsets. 
Rachel Gilmore and Erica Ifill just arrived. 
CBC President Catherine Tait says the internet is a dangerous place. She says going after journalists undermines democracy. CBC is pushing for action to remove “toxic messages” and ways to prevent those messages in the first place. She also wants legislation & societal change.

The Star’s Saba Eitizaz says hate followed Maxime Bernier’s call to “get dirty” with journalists. Says other politicians have legitimized messages. She says the burden of facing attacks should not be held by journalists and the matter is a danger to democracy. 

Marco Mendicino expresses gratitude for journalists like Rachel Gilmore. Says attacks against journalists are racist, mysoginistic, and criminal, and done by people who want to preserve a status quo. Adds that spaces must be kept safe. 
Erica Ifill says her organization does not always support her. They recognize some threats but not others. She says a huge problem is the far-right; convoy people, convoy adjacent people, and white supremacists. Notes that the panel had not characterized it as such. 
That’s probably because she’s an insane anti-White Shaniqua who calls happy White Children “gaslit,” by “White Anglo culture.” 
Saba Eitizaz brings up Diagolon, says the group has legitimized violent language. She also said that Trump and other populist leaders have created a problem for journalists. 
Erica Ifill says when she seeks an expert opinion, she does not talk to white men because her job is to challenge power. She then talked about CBC’s Queen coverage, and noted she was glad the queen died. She also says the media treats black women very poorly. 
Erica Ifill also says women are expected to be submissive towards white men, she calls it “misogynoir” (misogyny directed towards black women). She expects people to be assholes, use the n-word and call her a bitch, but “digital lynchings” cross a line. 
Rachel Gilmore is talking about her TikToks. She says TikTok is a “far less toxic platform”. She adds that it feels nice being on the platform as she can talk about her stories. 
Rachel Gilmore notes that when Holly Doan tweeted abt tonight’s event, ppl were laughing at it. Notes David Menzies says what is happening to her is mean tweets, but its not because she feels unsafe in her community. The fact I am looking over my shoulder, is that a mean tweet? 
Erica Ifill on wokeness: she says calling things woke is gaslighting to the max. She says the word comes from black liberation, but has been manipulated to gaslight people out of fighting for social justice. 
Rachel Gilmore says the hate she is receiving is unfair. Notes this happening because she is a woman and the matter rooted in misogyny. She notes that white men do not have to deal with this to the same extent. 
The event has ended. Carleton journalism head Allan Thompson mentioned he is a “poster boy of white privilege” as he closed off the event. 

Credit to Elie Cantin-Nantel for watching that so I don’t have to. And credit me for reading that so you don’t have to. However, there is one part that I absolutely need to analyze, because it shows how divorced from reality our privileged class is.

[Former Minister of Immigration] Marco Mendicino expresses gratitude for journalists like Rachel Gilmore. Says attacks against journalists are racist, mysoginistic, and criminal, and done by people who want to preserve a status quo. Adds that spaces must be kept safe. 

Marco Mendicino

If you listened to the uncensored propagandists for the privileged and powerful talk about themselves you might get the impression that they spend all their time running across WWI style no man’s land avoiding mines just in order to save the lives of innocent puppies of colour. In reality they are the parasites who lie us into wars and squeal with joy when our soldiers come home missing limbs. Then they tell them to go kill themselves when they get angry at the government not installing the disability equipment they promised. These people are pure filth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKK3UqJyAhQ&ab_channel=TheDailyRake

But the statement from Mendicino is so idiotic on the face of it that I can only imagine it is intentionally stupid in order to thunderstrike the audience. He says that people speaking truth to journalists are trying to preserve some status quo. Then in literally the next sentence he says that online spaces must be kept safe. He is literally trying to preserve the illegitimate status quo while accusing the peasants of doing exactly that.

The inversion of reality is so immense one must take a minute to collect oneself. The propagandists for the CBC, CTV, and others serve as the mouthpiece of the parasite class. Their purpose is purely to serve power, and telling one of these propagandists to go fuck themselves is a revolutionary act. But at a certain point it becomes impossible to respond to the things that they say, since they are just tactics designed to trip you up.

CTV News:

The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) announced on Friday that permanent residents will now be allowed to enlist, as the military struggles with low recruitment levels.

That means non-Canadians if you didn’t get it.

The CAF sounded an alarm in September over a severe shortage of recruits to fill thousands of vacant positions, meeting about half the number of applicants it needs per month to meet the goal of adding 5,900 members this year.

While the armed forces haven’t said whether the recent move was made to boost recruitment, Christian Leuprecht, a professor at the Royal Military College of Canada, says that it makes good sense.

“In the past, the CAF has had the luxury of being able to limit itself to citizens because it has had enough applicants. This is no longer the case,” Leuprecht told CTVNews.ca on Saturday in an email.

“The CAF had resisted opening up the ranks to permanent residents because it does create additional burdens and risks, in terms of security clearances, for instance.”

The Canadian Armed Faggots have had a recruitment problem for a while. A. Nonymous detailed this in his excellent paper, published on this site, which I strongly recommend everyone read. In short, it’s an anti-White Globo Homo institution that is not coincidentally also run with extreme incompetence. The sole purpose is to loot the rest of the country for $20-30 billion per year, and it accomplishes little else. It’s not even good for oppressing the citizenry, and the RCMP is militarized to serve that role instead.

Globo News:

The Canadian Armed Forces says it has received hundreds of applications from permanent residents interested in joining the military, but getting those prospective recruits into uniform could take up to two years.

The military says more than 2,400 people submitted applications in November, a number that the commander of the Canadian Forces Recruiting Group described on Wednesday as unexpected.

The number is especially notable when considering the military received about 4,000 applications over the same period from Canadian citizens.

The article says hundreds, and then 2,400 just in November. This is the kind of shoddy reporting that we’ve come to love and expect from Global News. Why not just throw two numbers out there separated by an order of magnitude? In any case, the Canadian military remains a joke, as does the rest of this zionist occupied society.

Categories
Anti-White Canada Clownworld Military

A. Nonymous on the Canadian Armed Forces and its Globo Homo Induced “Retention Problem” – Part 2

We left off with me reproducing the intro to whet your appetite. The original plan was simply to reproduce the entirety of the remaining forty page paper in this followup article. But then I had the same problem I’ve been having while reviewing Miller’s book “In His Own Words.” The paper spawns discussion. 

It’s also quite long, and I didn’t want people to ignore it. Luckily, Mr. Nonymous has broken his work up into three main sections. First “An introduction to the problem,” followed by “Faith in the Chain of Command,” and finishing with “Don’t cry because it’s over, smile because it happened!”. While it may seem duplicative, I’ll be covering the much expanded introduction in this piece.

1. The Absolute State of CAF Internal Communications

If only you knew how bad things really are…
– Anonymous 4chan poster

Every week, mass emails are sent to every CAF member and DND civilian on their internal email system, and they are a good dip stick of what the top brass (tin, because we’re broke) care about. They are called defense team messages, and they have anywhere from 10-25 headlines/links within. I acquired a set of these messages sent from January to June of 2022 and made the below list of headlines which I thought were telling (keep in mind these are merely an excerpt of each email). Take a look and see if there is anything you notice about these (aside from spelling mistakes and encoding errors), noting there are some duplicates that were used in multiple weekly messages:

No amount of praying and begging would get this next section formatted properly in WordPress. Beyond that, he provides links to all of these emails, which I couldn’t reproduce without an extremely time consuming process. Instead we’re going with screencaps.

A. Nonymous doesn’t even bother providing direct commentary on these emails. And honestly, what is there to say? The Canadian Armed Forces appears indistinguishable from the University of British Columbia’s Social Justice Institute at this point.

A. The Hardy Boys and the Corporal who didn’t care anymore

For a military organization, there sure is a lot of time and space devoted to counter-productive bullshit. Yes, it’s bullshit and I’m tired of pretending otherwise. These emails do have some worthwhile or at least non-bullshit material most of the time, usually right near the bottom of the message, but it is drowned out by the aforementioned nonsense. Below is a (poorly done) screenshot of one such Defence Team Message, broken into 2 pieces. Pretend you are a corporal who just received this in their inbox. That’s a joke by the way, I’d imagine most corporals have these set to auto-delete on receipt…

 

I’d imagine it went something like this. You saw the 60 Seconds with XYZ, and figured you could use those 60 seconds for something else. Or maybe not, fair enough. Then you saw the health services survey, and likely decided to politely, but firmly decline. Finally, you saw Asian heritage month and closed the email. Already on the 3rd heading, they’re virtue signaling with race-based propaganda, so why bother reading more? That’s unfortunate, because way down near the bottom of the message, there was a link talking about how four military members lost their lives in a motor vehicle accident. Would you consider that event to be, perhaps, of more importance than coronavirus bullshit or pay outcomes for civilian employees? Well, you considered wrong in the eyes of the author.

Referencing the list of headings above, do you see how people would get tired of such nonsense very quickly, even those who are unaware of the nature of this diversity stuff? Fortunately, those headlines are mostly from the weekly messages. That’s right, they also send topic specific messages when pertinent. As you can well imagine, most of these topics can fit within the women-gender-nonwhite-LGBTABCD-racism sphere of conversation.

You, the imaginary corporal, would be forgiven for thinking that the CAF exists solely to convert money into pride flags and women-only events. Imagine closing one of these emails, then looking outside the window at a parking lot full of dead-but-alive military scrap vehicles. What sort of organizational priorities do you perceive at this point? Statistically, as an imaginary corporal, you are most likely 25-30 years old, male, White, and heterosexual. Based on the firehose of bullshit in your inbox every week, it would be somewhat clear to you that unlike the CAF’s email servers you are neither wanted nor appreciated, and you would understand that the CAF cares more about dividing its people into categories than it does leveraging them to accomplish its mandate in unison, whatever that mandate has become. Isn’t the point of the uniform to make everyone the same? Didn’t you learn in public school that race doesn’t matter, and that a person is to be judged by their merits, rather than their skin or genitals?

Women in the military you say?

Were it so sexy. Sadly the reality is far less physically attractive, and far more insane.

B. Down the gender-neutral Rabbit Hole

These are just emails, of course, but they are backed up by a variety of CAF and government sources and corroborated by real life events. Let’s check out a few, shall we?

Guide on Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Terminology

Noslangues link. (source: Defence Team Messages)

I recommend taking a look at this, a government dictionary of diversity stuff. Here is an excerpt from a heading for ‘race’:

“Definition: A group of people who are arbitrarily categorized according to common physical characteristics, regardless of language, culture or nationality.

Notes: The concept of race has long since been used to establish differences between groups of people, often according to a hierarchy. It focuses on identifiable physical characteristics, such as skin colour, hair texture and facial features.

There is no scientific basis for the concept of race.

Refusing to talk about race could imply that racism and its consequences do not exist.”

Wait, WHAT? Race doesn’t scientifically exist (false), but refusing to talk about it [the thing that doesn’t exist] could imply that racism and its consequences do not exist? This reads like an awful facebook-tier meme from grandma, but this is an official government website. If you check the second definition for ‘racism’ (they have two) it states that it is ‘An ideology that establishes a hierarchy between races or ethnic groups’. An ideology that establishes hierarchy between different types of things that don’t exist? Anyways, please take a look and suffer on your own time, my brain already hurts; Clearly, I am not cut out for elite mental gymnastics.

A. Nonymous certainly is, but the above gibberish about race is a clear example of midwitism. Simple people can see that obviously race is real. Intelligent people can destroy the idiotic race denialist psuedo-intellectualism. But there exists a certain class of midwits who combine their relative lack of intellect with Obedient Personality Disorder and go on bloviating about how race is a deboonked idea.

Canada’s anti-racism strategy

Canadian Federal Government: (Source: Defence Team Messages)

Remember how race was defined as a social construct that doesn’t exist scientifically, just moments ago? Aside from the fact that the assertion is ludicrous, it is also scientifically false; Trusting the science© just isn’t the same since Thalidomide was deemed safe and effective™. This fake definition comes up as the first definition in the glossary, even before the introduction. “Race isn’t real, now read 70+ pages about how we’re going to address discrimination based on something that isn’t real” I’m not going to rehash this, let’s jump to the introduction and see what lovely morsels they have for us. I’m going to paraphrase some:

-foreign born non-Whites earn less than foreign born Whites

-Black men earn less than White men

-Natives are 4.9% of the population but 23.1% of criminal offenders

-There were 2,073 police-reported hate crimes in Canada in 2017 – a 47% increase over the previous year

-Hate crimes targeting Jewish and Muslim populations were the most common type of hate crime related to religion

-11% of individuals with a non-Christian religion indicated that they faced discrimination based on their religion in the previous five years compared to 1% of Christians.

The first two can be thrown out immediately. It is illegal to discriminate against people in Canada based on race, unless they are White. Earnings gap is therefore a personal choice, nothing more.

Not sure I agree with that last part, the bold being mine. IQ and earnings are strongly correlated. These people don’t necessarily choose to not graduate high school or not be functional engineers. Instead, they lack the grey matter.

That’d be kind of like saying that since the NHL or NFL are not legally allowed to discriminate against women, that women are not in the NHL purely due to choice. No, it’s because they suck at playing hockey. Frankly, women suck at most athletic endeavours, which is why trannies in female sports is such a big deal.

See “Lia” Thomas, for the greatest example.

The third one is complicated, and you can interpret it however you want. Are Natives more prone to criminal activity? Are their living conditions worse? Too bad, they have the choice to move out and work for a living, just like everyone else.

Hate crimes, eh? Hate crimes against non-Whites are easy to flaunt when hate crimes against Whites aren’t even considered hate crimes! Don’t believe me? Here, check out this article by the Washington Post.

Likewise, this applies to religions as well. Remember those church vandalism incidents during the summer of 2021, in the wake of the mass child grave that still hasn’t been proven to exist? Remember how the RCMP diligently investigated them? Yeah, uh, they didn’t do shit because Christianity bad, or something. Meanwhile, Rabbi Shekelberg paints a swastika on the Synagogue at night, and the pity points roll in.

To my knowledge there has never been an anti-Christian hate crime prosecuted. We had 70 churches arsoned or otherwise vandalized in the first month of the Gravocaust, with not a single anti-Christian hate crime charge.

One of the very first article series on this site was covering the desecration of a church in Vancouver less than an hours drive from myself. As can be expected, despite the explicit antifa membership of the cunts responsible, no hate crime charges were laid by the VPD, to no one’s surprise.

The conclusions of this anti-racism strategy are entirely predictable: In order to stop racism, they will indefinitely look for racism. Because they have a financial interest in finding racism, they will continue to discover racism, even if it is invented.

Ask me anything – Asian heritage month

Canadian Federal Government Website: (Source: Defence Team Messages)

May is Asian heritage month, a time to celebrate the contributions of Asians. That’s fine, I guess. No, you don’t get to have a White heritage month because of reasons; go fuck yourself. So, what will this event consist of? The description is, uhhhh, helpful I guess?

“The Ask Me Anything series provides you with an opportunity to increase your perspective—to learn from the lived experiences of individuals who are bravely sharing their stories to help educate and move the public service towards a culture where equity is embedded.”

Good for them, except what are they talking about? Lived experiences, does that imply that the mayonnaise coloured among us have neither lived, nor experienced anything? Bravely sharing what stories? Educating us towards equity? I could go on a tirade about equity. In fact I will later, but I will try to focus for the moment. This description is awful, forget what I said earlier, and forget the description altogether; It doesn’t matter, we all know what this is about. Let’s see who the panelists are:

-Alfonso Ralph Mendoza Manalo, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Policy Advisor, Race-based Data Collection Policy Advisor, Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)

-Marilou Moles, Senior Advisor, Integrated Planning and Coordination in the Afghanistan sector, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)

-Jennifer Hong, Co-chair of Visible Minority Advisory Council (VMAC), Natural Resources Canada (NRCan)

The first and last ones are self-explanatory. Their jobs are to find things to blame White people for. They don’t do actual work, they don’t lift sandbags, or clean halls. They don’t analyze business data for cost effectiveness, nor do they drive tractors. Their jobs are to bitch about racism, blame [White] people for it, and make the organization change at their whim. They have a financial incentive to find (invent) racism. Imagine a sewer treatment plant that just recirculates the same turds to justify its existence. In fact, Alfonso appears to also work to the end of obfuscating or altering police data [race-based data collection advisor] to presumably hide 13-do-50 or similarly inconvenient truths.

What does Marilou do, then? She, uhhhh, runs a lifestyle and fashion blog which “…she uses to support local businesses, showcases Black, Indigenous, and People of Color-owned businesses/artists.” Here it is.

So, we have two race-baiters, and one lady who apparently runs a successful blog. What does this have to do with Asian heritage month again? The authors have gone out of their way to talk about how Asian and diverse and Asian and non-White and Asian they are, and how their Asianness showcases Asian heritage month (for Asians), but have they actually showcased the merits of Asia or their own personal merits? Maybe they have, but it certainly isn’t mentioned here. This is the problem; nobody should care objectively that they are Asian in this context. Are they diligent and good people who contribute positively? Nobody objectively cares where a desk fan is made until it demonstrates its ability to move air. Frankly, this is an insult to Asia and its people. I know a variety of Asians, of varying types.

None of their cultures consist of bitching about racism and blaming whitey for everything, though you would be forgiven for assuming that after seeing this abomination. Granted, I didn’t attend the virtual event, so my ability to pass judgement is limited, but I hardly think that my judgements of the invitation are far from the truth.

This section ends with a detailed look at the Edmonton Pride Parade, and the CAF engagement with it. Spoiler: it’s exactly what you think. But we’ll get to that next time. I still need my Covid-19 recuperation time, although I’m getting noticeably better.

Categories
Canada Military

A. Nonymous on the Canadian Armed Forces and its Globo Homo Induced “Retention Problem”

NOTE: I will be away from home without my computer over this weekend, so be prepared for drastically less content. I have scheduled a piece for each day, with the help of guest writers.


Out of nowhere I get this pdf sent to me in the Daily Rake Writers Room private telegram chat. Very little fanfair, other than one of our guest writers explaining that a buddy of theirs wrote this paper on the military and is looking to get it published. I opened up the PDF, only to find out that it is 43 pages long. Simply reading the thing, let alone publishing it, is going to be a massive time committment. 

But then I started flipping through it and it’s fantastic. I can’t publish it all, because I’m leaving on a flight early tomorrow morning, but I can publish the intro to whet everyone’s appetites, and I promise to publish the rest as soon as I get back.

I have for now decided not to bold anything that I find particularly important. I may decide to do otherwise when publishing the next installments of this paper.


Why the CAF Will Never Fix its Retention Problem

A rant-become-essay on the chronically dying military denied the bliss of death.

By A. Nonymous

An introduction to the problem

The Canadian Armed Forces, hereafter referred to as the CAF, has a serious retention problem. Any organization with such a problem will feel the sting, but the CAF has a particularly nasty disadvantage that corporate entities don’t, that being the mandate to provide training to its members. When a person joins, the CAF is obligated to provide necessary training to them, either directly or through outsourcing (with some exceptions). This means that, when a person chooses to leave before retirement eligibility, they are bringing with them the CAF’s investment, and imposing the requirement for a reinvestment in whoever replaces them. In addition to the financial cost, there is the cost of time. Training takes time. An officer who goes through the Regular Officer Training Program will cost the CAF about 4 years of time just to get their degree, sometimes up to 6. Then, they must complete military occupational training, which might take an additional year or more. NCM training works a bit differently, as it includes stages of qualification in many cases. Due to that, achieving the final stages of qualification can take a similar amount of time for the most technical NCM trades. To further compound the problem, those running the military training are being taken from positions where they would otherwise be doing the jobs they are qualified for; fewer people to run training means a longer wait to fill positions, whereas maxing out training capacity would emaciate operational positions.

Why are people leaving though? The pay isn’t bad, though certain postings have a severe cost of living problem that hasn’t been addressed. The work conditions vary, but aren’t horrendous most of the time. As mentioned above, the opportunities for free (did I mention FREE?) training are quite numerous. Seriously, you can get a free master’s degree paid for.

As mentioned, the cost-of-living problem is dire in some regions. I won’t go into too much detail, but Ottawa (as an example) is the region with the most military people (around 10,000) and it is prohibitively expensive to live there. The CAF has chosen to do nothing about the problem, so many are choosing to release rather than live in poverty upon receiving a posting there. But Ottawa is not the entire country, contrary to the beliefs of those who live there. Costs aren’t that bad in places like Edmonton, Medicine Hat, Gagetown, Cold Lake. They are manageable, and it is possible that the CAF will address this issue in the coming centuries. Cost of living doesn’t explain the whole equation.

Why else might people choose to leave? Do they perceive the CAF as an organization which supports their personal values? Likely not. The CAF is downstream from its boss, the federal government. Therefore, if the feds adopt a new way of thinking, the CAF will eventually fall victim to mandate it as well. This is the most significant problem. Cost of living, training deficits, pay, benefits, all of these can be addressed if the leadership so chooses. The toxic dictates of the federal regime, however, cannot; The CAF is helpless to resist orders from its boss. This is the root problem. At the very least, it is the most significant problem, although less direct than cost of living might be. The point of no return on this issue is also firmly in the past, and unlike the CAF, I will be addressing the issue going forward in the paper.


This intro may seem a bit dry. After all, the CAF having retention problems is not all that interesting, until he actually gets into what he means by the CAF not reflecting the values of the people who are initially enthusiastic about joining the CAF, at least historically so.

Which is only partly dry economics, and more because of the Globo Homo infestation of the Armed Forces. This is something that is corroborated by everyone in the Canadian Armed Forces, one of whom sent me this sheet from the CAF’s mandated DLN (Defense Network Learning) training. And yes, you’re reading this correctly.

Fixing formatting errors from PDF’s is a tedious process, but A. Nonymous’ paper will be published as soon as I get back from this weekend trip. This is simply too important of a resource on the Canadian Military to let go unprinted for any length of time.

Categories
Canada Military

The Canadian Military is a Complete and Utter Joke, But the RCMP is the Real Military, Part 1

I’m not going to give many details for this one, but I have someone I talk with fairly regularly who is a former member of the Canadian Armed Forces. Recently, I wanted his opinion on numbers advantage for infantry combat, since I was writing a satirical article. Here was my original message to him.

I’m writing a satirical article, where the infantry’s rifles are replaced with “tactically superior” titanium rifles that all shoot depleted uranium or titanium sabot rounds with GPS guidance, and I could use a few quotes from you. So first of all, in infantry combat, what sort of outnumbered situation would be essentially hopeless?
What I mean by that is if there’s 10 of you, and x of the enemy, assuming roughly equal competence, at what point is retreat or surrender the only reasonable course of action? 1.5:1? 2:1? 10:1? I’m asking because I’m using it to illustrate a point.
Secondly, if you were given a lighter rifle that shot rounds that could “carve through body armour like nothing else,” then would this even meaningfully change things? And if so, how outnumbered would you be, assuming equal competence, before it would be an even fight again? 1.1:1? 1.5:1? 2:1?

I was just double checking that I wasn’t way off base when I was going to write in said satirical article that numbers advantage very much does matter. However, even I was surprised at his response.

The NATO, and especially Canadian Forces doctrine is 30:1 advantage or mission / fight is basically a no-go.

The Canadian Military has official doctrine that they need to be outnumbering the enemy forces by 30:1 or they’ll just sit there in their cuck sheds. This is apparently normal for NATO. Shockingly, they didn’t appear to win the war in Afghanistan.

He continued…

It’s not a meme. It literally is this way.
That means 1 whole platoon, for every “possible” enemy fighter.
Obviously special operations doesn’t do it this way all the time, but they have other support that essentially makes it 100:1 …. Mission is more dangerous, but they are given more advantages (nearly limitless budget)

Thirty. To. One. That’s the kind of expected advantage our troops are supposed to be relying on in order to do anything. He went on a bit about the lighter rifle, but got back to this.

Key takeaways though, even when the infantry has a equipment advantage, it doesn’t fight unless 30:1 troop advantage. Unless ambushed

I mean I’m not mad at him, I’m just nonplussed with military leadership. If that’s the way it is, that’s the way it is. I did have to respond to that though.

Also, isn’t that 30:1 advantage kind of… retarded? Like, how exactly could you possibly guarantee that in a real war against a real adversary? I’m just imaging WW3, with nukes having gone off on all sides, utterly collapsed infrastructure, planes and other vehicles being extremely starved of fuel, everybody mostly starving to death.
And then the half starved infantry spying some food storage plant guarded by five guys. But instead of attacking they just starve to death, because they’ve only got 100 guys, so that’s a 20:1 advantage, not a 30:1 advantage.
Am I missing something? Is this not the most asinine shit ever?

To which he responded:

Obviously if desperate they will do something outside of doctrine, but I think they are very tuned in to fighting counter insurgencies with flawless logistical support.

He went on to explain how terrible the Canadian Military would be in any sort of nuclear war, or really any serious war of any kind. But if we left the conversation there, that would actually make some sense. Fighting “counter-insurgencies,” fits well with the “peacekeeper,” type missions the Canadian Military LARPs like it’s good at doing. That also has the secondary benefit of being exactly what you would need to suppress the peasants at home in case of some sort of uppityness, so that all sort of works.

Except that the Canadian Military is basically worthless even when doing that. I’m going to skip around in the conversation a bit, and highlight the most important parts.

After hearing him say this, we talked for a bit about what a joke it is that Canadians spend $22B per year on the military, to get a peacekeeping force. But apparently they aren’t even that.

Me: I think that ZOG views the Canadian Military as being a police force against Canadians if they get too uppity. After all, even a joke of an infantry is still too much for any sort of random militia types. Beyond that, it’s simply yet another way to steal tax dollars, see F-35.

To which he responded.

Not remotely.

Our troops aren’t ready for policing.

The average police officer is 1000x more capable. And better funded. I’m pretty sure Victoria Police Service or their RCMP branch is better funded than their reserve regiments, which if I remember correctly, are almost NES (non-effective strength)

This didn’t make any sense to me at first. After all, the police just have handguns, so even some relatively poor infantry ought to be more effective than the police at doing some violent policing, right? Well not quite.

Him: When I was in, the cops would sometimes drop in to train with us, and they had way better gats. Like their rifles were actually designed to do work. Ours were the outcome of some procurement schemes.

Their rifles?

Me: Since when did the police get rifles anyway?

Him: They have PaTrOL CaRbiNeS….. Almost all of them have a Colt Canada C8, tuned up, in their vehicle.

Above is an image taken from the crackdown on the Trucker Protesters. I assumed that these images were the Canadian Military. After all, they’re wearing camo, and they have rifles.

In reality no, that’s the RCMP. And no, they didn’t need to borrow any equipment from the military, they already own it. 

I will have a lot more to say on the “patrol rifle program,” that was brought in under the conservatives in 2011. That’s the subject of another article. But for now we’ll focus on the Canadian Military.

Him: Last I ckecked, the infantry only had like 6k guys, and of those, at best, half are ready to actually do work.

Our special operations regiment is pretty small, and getting smaller as far as I know. Morale is very low.
Me: Six. Thousand. Infantry. 
You have got to be fucking kidding me.

$30 BILLION DOLLARS PER YEAR BUYS US SIX THOUSAND INFANTRY AND HALF OF THEM SUCK.

NOTE: I had to make this part a little bit less specific.

Him: It’s so much worse than that, bro

[REDACTED] Many of [the personnel] haven’t received their primary trades course for…….. 4 years!

Meaning, they have been UNTRAINED PRIVATES for FOUR fucking years.

An untrained Pte. is essentially a glorified ball washer.

Intern tier.

Pic was from an article celebrating homo-pervert shit in the military.

A lot of people join the military due to the promise that they will be getting trained on various things, like mechanics, that have real world value. Except that the Canadian Military hasn’t been training them properly, or even at all. 

Me: I’m almost struggling to understand this level of lethargic incompetence. They don’t even need these guys to be trained to operate the machinery or anything like that?

They just paid them to be there and not really do anything? WTF?

Him: But yeah. It’s collapse levels of incompetency and negligence.

Well the way pay works in the military is funny. you get paid in 4 or 8 hour increments. But check this:
Any work over 8 hours is free. So a 19 hour shift is basically mostly free.

Class C pay is different, but it’s not much better. In combat arms trades, it’s basically real gulag hours

NOTE: I asked him to look over this article, and he said this part about pay needs some work. There are many classes of payment in the Canadian Military, and it’s more complicated than that. 

So they basically have these guys as gulag labourers, at least if they want. But it’s some combination of them abusing these men, and also just being totally wasteful and incompetent and not having anything for them to do.

Don’t forget, this was held by the Canadian Military.

I’ve covered the Canadian Military before, specifically their “Courageous Conversation on White Fragility.” He’s made some comments WRT to the internal anti-White nature of the military before, but this is still quite eye opening. 

Notice all the anechoic tiles that have fallen off the sub. Oh yeah it’s undeniably ready to sink some ships.

The Canadian Military is a complete and utter joke. But it isn’t priced like a joke. It costs around $22B per year. And that’s just what’s officially recorded.

The best estimations for the Russian Military Budget put it somewhere around $60B per year. For $60B, they get a blue water navy with about 60 nuclear subs, the world’s largest stockpile of nuclear warheads, 1,600 jet fighters, well over a hundred thousand trained infantry, over 10,000 tanks and almost 30,000 total armoured vehicles, huge quantities of artillery, attack helis, over 1,000 SU-25 CAS planes. The list goes on.

On the other hand, we get four diesel subs that don’t work and some cruisers as a navy. Then we get no nuclear weapons, 88 jet fighters, 6k poorly trained and outfitted infantry, 20 tanks (yes, you read that correctly), a few artillery pieces, terrible troop transport helis, no attack helis, no CAS planes, no recon planes. The list goes on.

Canada is the worlds fourth largest oil producer, and the worlds second largest Uranium producer. Canada should have one of the world’s most powerful militaries. It was decided against the will of Canadians by the Conservative Party of Diefenbaker that Canada would not be a serious country. And this was best exemplified by the destruction of the Avro Arrow.

But even if they made the conscious decision to have a military that was good at peacekeeping missions, or counter-insurgency stuff, they could actually be extremely good at that for $22B per year. And I don’t just mean extremely good, I mean that they could probably spend 1/10th that amount and actually do it.

Troop transport helis, small cargo planes, and light CAS/Recon planes are all cheap, from the perspective of a military. You can make something like the OV-10 Bronco for well under $10 million without trying. An even smaller plane, preferably with piston engines, will set you back more like $1 million per.

Jeeps to transport infantry around are cheap. Okay maybe not some gold plated piece of trash, but actual serious ones. The trucks are cheap. Everything is cheap. The actual expensive parts of a military are blue water navies and air forces*, which you don’t need at all to do peacekeeping/COIN missions. 

*To be clear, we’re assuming light CAS planes and cargo planes are the property of the Army, like attack helis. They may not be due to bureaucratic legalese demanding fixed wing aircraft be the property of the air force, but I’m using air force as shorthand for the jet fighters, air tankers, AWACS, bombers, and other high altitude and extremely expensive, both to buy and maintain, aircraft.

Keep this in mind when you hear Conservatives whining about “muh NATO dollar commitments”

For $22B per year, you get none of that. You get nothing. Absolutely nothing. They don’t need the military to be effective at doing anything, since they have the RCMP serving as infantry ready to oppress the peasants at a moments notice.

RCMP officer with “patrol rifle.”

The Canadian military is simply a black hole where $22B of your taxdollars goes and then disappears. Oh, I’m sure there are some people who know what becomes of it, but it’s all just grift. The B-35 may be the most obvious example, being a plane that costs $19B, and does precisely nothing, but you don’t get to $22B flushed down the drain without a whole lot of little bullshit grifts stacked on top of each other.

If we imagine that the total cost of a single infantryman is $100k per year, after adding up salary, ammunition costs, total fuel consumed by him through cargo transfers, etcetera, we could get 220,000 of them for $22B per year. Cut that down to 100k and you’ve got $12B per year leftover for everything else. Like maybe actually fixing the subs.

The Canadian Military is a complete and utter joke. It’s not even good for oppressing the population. It’s good for absolutely nothing other than stealing your taxdollars.

Nobody can even explain what the purpose of the military even is. The justification for the B-35 purchase was “to meet our NATO obligations.” In other words, no reason but grift.

But like I said, it’s the RCMP that’s the real Canadian Military, and I’ll be covering that in the next piece.