The celebration of the 200th edition of this column continues as we count down the 200 most iconic queers in all of cultural history in an epic four-part series. This is the penultimate instalment, and it’s getting severe up in here.
I clicked on CBC today for some content, and I was greeted with this article. Here’s the intro card.
98. Kristen Stewart
Occupation: Actress, filmmaker Years active: Got her big break at the age of 11 playing the daughter of none other than Jodie Foster in David Fincher’s 2002 film Panic Room. Currently in the midst of getting the respect she’s deserved for some time thanks to herOscar-nominated work in Spencer. Why so iconic: For deciding post-Twilight that she would adopt a zero fucks attitude (but in the most charming way possible) to both what Hollywood expects of her career choices and how the public views her sexuality. And definitely also for this badass Saturday Night Live monologue that displayed a considerably more measured approach to coming out on live TV in front of millions of people than her former onscreen mother, Foster:
I don’t know what’s worse, that it’s so gay, or that it’s so gay. And by gay I mean tabloid celeb drama garbage that shouldn’t exist in the first place.
I clicked on the propagandist page, in this case Peter Knegt, and was greeted with this. Just in case the text gets blurred out, I’m reproducing his bio below.
Peter Knegt (he/him)
has worked for CBC Arts since 2016, writing the LGBTQ-culture column Queeries (winner of the 2019 Digital Publishing Award for best digital column in Canada) and spearheading the launch and production of series Canada’s a Drag, variety special Queer Pride Inside, and interactive projects Superqueeroes and The 2010s: The Decade Canadian Artists Stopped Saying Sorry.
No, my brain doesn’t process these kinds of things any better than yours, goy.
Collectively, these projects have won Knegt four Canadian Screen Awards.
We might have to stop accusing Schlomos of nepotism, because faggots are on a whole ‘nother level. As a group perverts are the most discriminatory and nasty people on the planet. They’re AIDS-ridden shitdicks with nasty catty temperments, and some I presume, are good people.
Beyond CBC, Knegt is also the filmmaker of numerous short films and the author of the book About Canada: Queer Rights. You can follow him on Instagram and Twitter with the same obvious handle: @peterknegt.
Here’s a list of some of his other works.
/OurGirl/ Emma is not particularly impressed, and neither am I. This is who your taxes fund, a disgusting pervert doing tabloid drama about other perverts while winning awards given to it, undeservedly no doubt, by other perverts.
I’ve written before about how much of a joke modern air forces truly are, with the USAF and most NATO countries exemplifying a certain “if you pretend bad things can’t happen, they can’t happen,” attitude. When most people think about fighter planes, they start thinking about tactical performance. You know, how fast they go, how many g’s of structural strength they have, or, god forbid, they buy into the bloviation about “muh stealth,” and pretend that any plane with some slightly higher frontal RCS simply explodes when coming within 200 nautical miles of an F-35.
In the very last article in this series I’ll get into tactical considerations, and how these modern planes actually suck there as well. However, as idiotic as discussions from armchair generals get, they are entirely irrelevant, because the strategic and operational performance of all modern US Fighter planes, and most other countries as well, is so spectacularly bad that it’s entirely unnecessary to ever fight them in the air in the first place.
Ukrainian Mig-29 lying in pieces.
OPERATIONAL FAILURE: DESTROYING PLANES ON THE GROUND
Most of the time people don’t consider the importance of the airbase to the airplane. For naval operations it’s obvious that if you sink the aircraft carrier, all the planes on board are going down with it.
Yet for some strange reason people don’t seem to apply this very same logic to the airbases on land. Modern jet fighter planes are, with a few exceptions I’ll get to later, princesses which require long and entirely smooth concrete runways to take off and land from. Airbases which, by their very nature, cannot be hidden, cannot be disguised, and are therefore easily known to whatever enemy you are fighting. They can be easily destroyed by long range missiles with nuclear warheads, but frankly, even the conventional warheads appear to be doing the job just fine.
Ukrainian airbase smoking after Russian missile strike.
This is not some sort of theoretical concept. This is not me retreating to my bunker of autism and pouring through technical specifications before realizing “Great Scott, our airbases can be destroyed with long range missiles.” The Russians did this right at the start of this current war, and then stopped because the Ukrainian Airforce was already destroyed. Contrary to bullshit “Ghost of Kiev” propaganda, where Samuyii Hydekov downed 10 Russian Fighters on the first day, the Russian’s have only a single confirmed fighter plane not lost due to accident, an SU-30, which was destroyed not in air combat, but due to Ukrainian artillery strikes at Millerevo Airbase just across the Russia-Ukraine border.
Destroying airbases, and aircraft on the ground, is far older than that. In 1967 the Israeli’s destroyed almost 300 of Egypt’s 500 aircraft in a pre-emptive strike on Egyptian airbases in yet another terrorist action by the jew ethnostate. Regardless of the morality, my point is that destroying aircraft on the ground is really effective, and how any halfway competent military takes care of things.
WW2 Airfield
In fact, this was an enormous problem even back in WW2, with one huge mitigating factor. Above we see a German airfield from WW2. You may notice that it is literally a field. This wasn’t unique to the Germans either.
Here we see English fighters taking off from a field that also has a light dusting of snow. As you can probably imagine, destroying such an airfield is difficult in two ways. First, there’s not that much infrastructure to destroy. Second, they can just go to the next field over, now can’t they?
US Air Force base in Jordan.
Modern air force bases are a little different. This is not to say that WW2 armies didn’t enjoy concrete, built up airbases when that was available, but their fighter planes could take off and land from an enormous percentage of untreated land in their own countries. Clear some forest, and you’ve got a new WW2 airfield. Hell, just use some existing farmers field, of which there will be many thousands awaiting your planes.
In contrast, this air force base can be completely destroyed, at least temporarily, by putting a single 10 ft divot in the middle of the runway. In the same way that an aircraft carrier can be rendered completely inoperable with damage to the catapults, or the runway itself, you can keep every single fighter plane at these bases grounded until the time it takes to bring in the construction crew and fix it.
F-35 with collapsed nose gear
And of course, I skipped over the most classical way of destroying enemy airpower, which is just marching your army onto their airbases. In WW2, during the three week Battle of France, the Germans did not destroy French airpower by whittling down their fighter reserves in aerial combat. Instead, they just overran French airfields, as well as destroying the essential infrastructure required to protect them. Because you see, when Hans parks his Panzer on your airfield, it isn’t really yours anymore, now is it?
Now you might be thinking “so why don’t we just go back to using fields like the WW2 planes.” Unfortunately, it’s not so simple. WW2 planes are often thought of as being slower, and that’s true, but they also had better lift/speed ratios. For any given speed and altitude they could pull more lift, or more accurately, more g’s, since lift in the absence of weight is sort of irrelevant. There are a few implications to this, but the most relevant to this discussion is that they had lower takeoff and landing speeds than these modern jet fighters. Beyond that, since they were designed by actually serious people, they had rugged landing gear that could survive hard landings on rough fields.
Actually, to quantify that for you. In the absence of wind, all planes produce 0 lift at 0 speed. However, different planes have different takeoff speeds, which is the minimum speed, at sea level, where they can produce 1G of lift. For civilian planes like the Piper Cherokee I used to fly, that’s something like 100 kmph, even less with the flaps down. For fighter planes that’s more like 250 kmph. For these purpose built STOL airplanes, which are basically show airplanes, they appear to be taking off around 20kmph.
I included that video, because I want to show that lower takeoff and landing speeds also means less takeoff roll. This is entirely irrelevant when using some 10,000+ft runway on a pristine airfield that will be getting destroyed by long range ICBM’s in the first five minutes of WW3. However, it is extremely relevant when dealing with planes who, for practical purposes, may have to land and take off from fields surrounded by trees.
It’s not like it’s impossible to build a modern plane that is capable of short takeoff and landing (STOL). After all, the modified Piper Cubs do it, and the OV-10 Bronco above has more practical STOL performance, having good lift/speed, as well as extremely rugged landing gear. However, the design decisions that enable jet fighters to have high speeds, such as highly swept back and fairly small wings, supersonic airfoils, etcetera, are incompatible with the generation of high amounts of lift required for low speed takeoff and landing. Lift generated is roughly proportional to the square of the velocity in airspeed. For a fighter plane that is designed to cruise at 1100kmph, and fight at around 600-1500kmph, it doesn’t make so much sense to be able to take off at 100kmph. The thicker and wider wings that we would need to pull that off are simply extra weight and drag at those higher speeds.
Additionally, the turbojet engines, necessary for high speeds, have horrific fuelBurn/thrust ratios, and are very fragile to small particulate matter getting sucked into the intake. Absent foreign object debris (FOD) covers, they are vulnerable to any random pebble getting sucked into the intake and, in the worst case scenario, causing the engine to explode.
Swedish Gripen Fighter
While much of this is the unfortunate downside to turbojet engines and higher speed, it’s not necessarily true that any plane with a turbojet, or low bypass turbofan, and decent cruise/fighting speed is some strategically irrelevant princess that is utterly useless in a real war. The Russians build all their fighters to be able to take off from flat dirt fields, and made the sacrifices in terms of weight and internal volume to get the landing gear size and strength to do so. The Swedes back in the 70’s went one step further with their Bas-60 system. They built their fighters to be extremely small so they could land on any two lane road, and then built a redundant system of dispersed, pre-stocked airbases so that they could maintain operation even under nuclear bombing.
Viggen fighter at highway staging area. Notice the fuel tanks pre-supplied to the plane’s right.
It’s not hard to understand why this is so important. Imagine we have 1,000 fighter planes. If we stage them at 1 airbase, then 1 single missile strike and our entire fleet is gone. In contrast, if we have 1,000 airbases, then we would need 1,000 successful missile strikes to destroy it all. And it’s possible to build some very rudimentary protection that goes a long way, like the roof pictured below, or dirt embankments, that protect very efficiently against bomb blasts.
It’s even better than that, because these bases are so austere, containing little more than easily created shelter, and some fuel supplies and armament for a single fighter, that they can be built en-masse, in far higher numbers than necessary in peacetime. Beyond that, it’s far easier to construct these in secret, than it is constructing a massive traditional airbase.
Bas 60 hangar
Of course, the logistical nightmare of getting fuel to 1,000 different bases, or more, is no joke. Civilian airports, at least the big ones, have fuel pipelines similar to oil pipelines, where the refineries pump the fuel directly to the airports. If they had to take trucks, the traffic would be absolutely enormous. I’ll get into fuel requirements for modern planes in the second installment, but suffice to say it’s quite the task.
Smaller, dispersed airbases have the downside of being more expensive to maintain and operate, especially in peacetime. You also need to spend a lot of money to set this system up, and you need more logistical vehicles in both peacetime and wartime to make it all work. Even worse, your generals need to get their feetsies wet going and inspecting them in the middle of winter with all the snow. Poor bureaucrats.
It has the upside that you don’t get your fleet destroyed in a few minutes because Russia launched about 3 long range nuclear missiles at your well known and not secret airbases. You’d think that would be somewhat important, but this is the US military we’re talking about. Rest assured there are no limits to hubris and stupidity.
US F-35
One of the best ways to point out that someone is full of shit is to find contradictions in what they say. I do this all the time for the Manlet Cult, but you can do this for Military Industrial Complex shills just as easily. There are two entirely contradictory things they’ll say about modern warfare.
Long range nuclear ICBM’s can be launched with the press of a button, make their way across the world at a speed of about 7km/s, and land within 350 meters of the intended target 90% of the time and then go boom. Even without that, short range ballistic missiles and cruise missiles can be fired from land or sea at targets up to about 2,000 km away, and blow them up.
The airbases we’re flying our fighter planes out of are completely indestructible. For some reason.
Russia takes the approach that concrete, pristine airbases are going to get destroyed, and pays the weight and volume penalty on their fighters in order to be able to take off and land from rough fields. The Swedes of all people build small fighters, capable of taking off and landing from roads, along with an entire system created to allow them to operate under serious attack. The US Military has taken a different approach. That approach being:
If you just pretend that, like, the enemy isn’t allowed to destroy your airbases, then they will not be doing that and you’ll be totally fine.
This does not appear to be a very serious approach to warfare.
Pretending that “muh Russkies,” or “Chyna Bad” do not have the ability to totally destroy US airpower, which is conveniently operating out of just a few known airbases, does not, and this might shock you, actually prevent them from doing so.
I was as surprised to learn this as you were, but it’s true. Pretending that fighter planes can’t get destroyed on the ground does not protect them from getting destroyed on the ground. Who knew?
Yes, Virginia, the US Military Bureaucracy is an entirely unserious outfit that exists solely to thieve money from the US taxpayer, and other goyim around the world.
These people feel unserious, because they are unserious. But the takeaway is not simply that the US Military Industrial Complex is a complete and utter joke. Well it is that, but I’m talking about fighter planes specifically, and I want you to understand this.
Any fighter plane that cannot take off from rough, unprepared airfields, or, as a consolation prize, random two lane roads, is not an actual weapon of war. Instead, it exists primarily as a weapon to do strikes against the taxpayer. There may be a small secondary role of missile strikes against goat herders, and third world countries that lack the ability to do long range missiles strikes against the airbases these planes are flying out of. Any serious first world country will simply destroy these planes on the ground.
Next time we look at the strategic implications of using planes that consume mor than 25,000+ lbs of fuel in a single hour long mission.
In sports, there will always be a winner. I appreciate the delight and gratitude of champions who revel in their moment. It is important to celebrate a victor’s journey and I absolutely love the heroics of an underdog and those who faced insurmountable barriers and challenges.
It is formidable when a winner shows sportsmanship and extends kindness in that moment of glory. Conversely, it is despicable when a winner looks down on others from atop the podium.
Tennis legend Billie Jean King, who I consider the patron saint of women’s sports, famously said: “I think self-awareness is probably the most important thing towards being a champion.”
This is going to be just fantastic. Let me take a minute and soak this in. This delusional rug munching vagina-person praising itself for it’s self-awareness.
You see, Billie Jean King was a pretty good female tennis player. Not the best, which we’ll get to later, but very good. She’s most remembered for handidly beating Bobby Riggs, a retired English tennis player who described himself as a “male chauvinist,” who said things like “a womans place in in the kitchen and the bedroom”. They played a tennis match dubbed the “battle of the sexes,” in the ’70s. King destroyed Riggs in a courageous and stunning blow against Penis Supremacy that was so naseauting it spawned a 2017 movie that nobody ever heard of with exactly that title.
As many can understand, since this serves the narrative of Globo Homo Schlomo, the conversation stops there, but there has always been more than a little wrong with the so-called Battle of the Sexes. After all, this was the same Bobby Riggs who absolutely destroyed the actual best female tennis player at the time, Margaret Court, earlier that same year in a match that has been dubbed the “Mother’s Day Massacre.”
Sure is weird how Riggs utterly demolished the best female tennis player, and then gets destroyed by Billie Jean King in a match where the betting odds had him as the hands down favourite.
Nor does footage from the match itself do Riggs any favours, as we can see unforced error after unforced error from Riggs, including many double faults on serves, which he was known for almost never doing.
The ESPN program Outside the Lines[49] made an allegation that Riggs took advantage of the overwhelming odds against King and threw the match to get his debts to the mob erased. The program featured a man who had been silent for 40 years for reasons of self-protection who claimed that he had worked at a country club and heard several members of the mafia talking about Riggs throwing the match in exchange for cancelling his gambling debt to the mob. The program also stated that Riggs’ close friend and estate executor Lornie Kuhle vehemently denied Riggs was ever in debt to the mob or received a payoff from them.
Billie Jean King is a monument to delusion, which is why I find it pretty damn hilarious that she’s quoted in this article as saying “I think self-awareness is probably the most important thing towards being a champion.”
Anyway back to this CBC garbage.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine thrust sports to the political forefront. We have seen athletes be so public and sincere in their grief. And still many continue to navigate through systems of racism and sexism — systems that are also damaging and violent.
Just this past weekend, four-time Grand Slam tennis champion Naomi Osaka was heckled while competing at the prestigious BNP Paribas tournament in Indian Wells, Calif. Someone in the crowd yelled out, “Naomi, you suck.” Osaka immediately went to the umpire, who dismissed the complaint and refused to eject the heckler. Osaka eventually lost the match.
Hold on, they even include a video of this. I’m screencapping this because it’s too good.
The caption they include under the picture is somehow better than the still itself.
Rattled by a derogatory shout from a spectator, Naomi Osaka went on to lose 6-0, 6-4 to Veronika Kudermetova in the second round of the Indian Wells Masters tournament.
Some random guy yelled “Naomi you suck,” and this rattled Naomi so hard she lost in straight sets. Okay, was there any particular reason for this Naomi?
After the match, Osaka said she was emotional because she had recently seen a video of Serena and Venus Williams being heckled by fans at Indian Wells in 2001.
Naomi apparently stopped talking, as if what she had just said made the slightest amount of sense. Our investigative journalists have concluded, no, it most certainly did not.
Afterward, she took the mic and addressed the crowd. She thanked them repeatedly through her tears (read: champion behaviour.) But she also specified that it wasn’t the issue of being heckled — it was that she was being heckled at the same tournament that in 2001 Venus and Serena Williams were booed and racially abused.
Anyway this CBC propagandist goes on to flat out repeat what it already said in the caption, because this emotional breakdown was so delicious that it needed to be read out twice.
At that tournament, their father and coach, Richard Williams, had been unjustly accused of orchestrating a result in the semifinal between the sisters, having Venus Williams withdraw because of an injury. Serena Williams went on to win the tournament but was still booed. Richard Williams was called the n-word. As a result, the Williams sisters boycotted the tournament for 14 years.
Based Indians. Doing the jobs that American’s won’t do.
Osaka said that the memory of the Williams family getting booed played repeatedly in her head. For those arguing that she should withstand the pressure and heckling, there is more at play because of Osaka’s own experience as a racialized woman in tennis. And why should Osaka have to manage the terrible behaviour of a wretched and unkind person? Why wasn’t the woman who heckled her disciplined for disgraceful behaviour and contributing to systems of toxicity in tennis?
I mean, okay.
The lack of resolution shown by the match umpire was the first breakdown in any advocacy for Osaka’s well-being. For racialized athletes, heckling is not simply a form of disrespect, it is marinated in sexism and racism as well. For Black and Brown women athletes, their identities are intrinsic to who they are, and criticism of them needs to be understood with this nuance.
Racialized is a term these anti-White propagandists created so they didn’t have to say “non-White,” in the hopes that they could be just as anti-White, just hidden under a layer of obfuscation and bullshit.
During this same weekend, the wondrous Serena and Venus Williams –
Look, when your writing comes across as identical to mine there’s a problem here. I would have written “the wondrous Serena and Venus Williams,” as a parody, but no please, by all means, this is the language a serious adult uses.
– were attending the Critics Choice Awards to present to those who worked on the film King Richard. It is a movie about their father, the journey of the family and the world of tennis. But amidst the celebration emerged another ugly event, again from a woman.
Jane Campion
Jane Campion won Best Director for her film, The Power of the Dog. As a white woman from a very respected and established New Zealand family, this was an award she clearly cherished. The beaming and grinning Campion approached the mic and accepted the award and gave her love to the other nominees — all men.
If you’re wondering why the W in White People isn’t capitalized, that is an official CBC policy. Beyond that, Jane Campion being White is, in this case, irrelevant. Except the author of this propaganda, Shireen Ahmed, is merely looking for yet another opportunity to attack White People, in this case, Jane Campion.
Campion then looked at Venus and Serena Williams and said: “Venus and Serena, you are marvels … however, you don’t play against the guys like I have to.”
What a splendid way to cut down two Black women and also infer that your struggles have been greater than theirs. I understand that Campion is a storied filmmaker and may exist in her own bubble, but is she ignorant to the horrible abuse and maltreatment that the Williams sisters have faced from tennis, sports media, fans and other tennis personalities? Their clothes, their hair, their bodies, and even their celebratory dances have been critiqued and belittled.
We may need to add Jane Campion to the Based Wahmen collage.
On Monday, Campion released a statement in which she apologized to the sisters for what she called a “thoughtless comment.”
I may have spoke too soon.
Some may feel the need to defend Campion and argue that her issue wasn’t about race, it was about gender. But Serena and Venus Williams cannot separate their race from their gender nor should they ever be expected to.
I’m almost too baffled to respond to that. They can absolutely separate their race from their gender, because those two things are entirely different you absolute clown.
The faster that all women understand this, the better off we will be. I would have loved to be happy for Campion and her win. But I remain unimpressed with her foolish acceptance speech and how she needlessly stepped on the Williams sisters. The applause in the background — equally belittling — cements my feelings.
Footage of Emma Watson laughing at the Williams sisters, in a very White Supremacist way, started circling twitter before Emma did a one woman terrorist attack on twitter headquarters to suppress the footage. But I get that Shireen Ahmed doesn’t want to bring that up. Women’s achievements, in this case Emma Watson’s QuadKill at Twitter Headquarters, are only to be celebrated if those wahmen aren’t White.
The ever-grinning Campion self-congratulated disrespectfully at the expense of two Black women — arguably two of the greatest athletes in history. This is not winning with dignity, in my view it is racist behaviour so superbly masked in ways only that rich, white women dare to do.
Not only have Serena and Venus played against women, but they have also played against entire systems of racism, cruel media, unwelcoming tennis culture, and that includes men, too.
There is a way to rise to the top without stepping on Black women or anyone else for that matter. Campion chose not to take this path. She may have won, but she was in no way a champion.
I actually showed that last little bit to Ms. Watson right before she went off to go fight for the Azov Battalion in Ukraine. The part where the dumb Ahmed broad thinks she’s being clever by sort of rhyming Campion with Champion.
We snapped that pic just as she hijacked a passenger airliner flying to Poland, on her way to the Azov Battalion. You can’t hold Watson’s support of the Azov Battalion against her. She’s headstrong that girl. Had murdered 40 Israeli children by the time she turned 14. I tried to tell her that the Azov Battalion are funded by jews and the US State Dept, but she got distracted by the swastikas and Black Sun’s and now she’s over in god knows where alongside the Shadow of Ukraine.
Emma Watson relaxes in a hottub at the Ottawa Trucker Protest
She was only briefly in Canada for the Finklethink Convoy protest. I love the girl, but she’s just so easily tricked. What can you do?
Look on the bright side, Monica Cannon-Grant — at least the feds didn’t videotape you stuffing marked $100 bills down your bra.
But other than the Dianne Wilkerson gotcha photograph, Tuesday’s indictment of the sticky-fingered Social Justice Warrior has everything.
As you read the 38 pages of charges, it’s hard to know who is more unspeakably corrupt — the race-hustling Monica, or the Boston establishment and their media stooges who swallowed her shameless hate speech hook, line and sinker.
The Daily Rake reached out to Monica and received only this email in response.
Muh Nigga Shieeet. We be spendin dat chedda on nails homey.
Sources have said “that sounds like a White Person trying to make fun of Shaniqua and I’m not sure I believe it.” However, we assure you, she really did sent us that email entirely unprompted.
Is Monica still the Boston Globe’s “Bostonian of the Year?”
Does Boston Magazine still think she’s “the best social justice advocate in Boston?”
Do the Boston Celtics still consider her “a hero among us?”
Does the Boston City Council still offer her “congratulations” after her 18-count indictment?
Does the Roxbury Unity Community still consider her a “Leader of Tomorrow?”
Of all the slobbering, the Globe is probably most responsible for enabling this alleged million-dollar flim-flam to fester for so long.
Remember the Globe’s front-page profile, by two of their crack scribes, describing her as both “a firecracker and a mother bear” who “leads change.”
The Globe is owned by the same pampered puke who owns the Boston Red Sox. You know that big banner at Fenway Park facing the Turnpike extension: “Black Lives Matter.”
I have no idea who this Howie Carr fellow is, but I’m curious, who is the Boston Red Sox owner? We now play the game of jew or not jew. Place your bets, I’m excited to find out.
Alright, ready for the face reveal?
Boston Red Sox owner John W. Henry
Verdict: Soyim, not jew.
You, reading this.
I know, I was as wrong as you were, but one look at his face and I got it.
Here we see a video of Monica from 2020. And below we see one of her getting indicted.
This isn’t the first BLM scam I’ve written about, and I doubt it’ll be the last. The only saving grace is that she lightened the wallets of some of the shittiest people in the country, and is now going to jail.
Former California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on Thursday told the Russian people that they are being fed misinformation about their country’s assault on Ukraine and appealed to Russian President Vladimir Putin to stop the attack.
Yeah who could forget when Putin lied about Saddam Hussein having WMD’s and starting a war that lead to the murders of hundreds of thousands of people? God, Putin just so bad. Putin baaaad. There, I said it with four a’s. That’s how bad he is.
The Hollywood star –
Okay I’m gonna stop you right there. Ahnold’s career, as a steroid abusing guy who can’t act, ended once his hormones permanently flatlined. Have you seen this goy’s body lately?
Something tells me he’s not quite ready to resume work as the male lead in the action scenes.
It is unclear how much people in Russia know about the war after the Kremlin cut access to various media channels and websites.
Russia cutting off access to foreign propaganda you say? So I guess it’s bad to cut off access to foreign news networks then. That’s the principle, let’s see if these people really believe it.
Why is it that I literally never have to even argue the principle with these propagandists? Why is it I can always just do a quick internet search for them immediately contradicting themselves? Was it always this bad, and it’s just the internet that’s really brought how trivially duplicitous these liars really are, or are they getting worse over time?
Schwarzenegger asked Russians to spread the word about the “human catastrophe” and told Russian protesters the world is watching.
“The world has seen your bravery. We know you have suffered the consequences of your courage,” he said. “You are my new heroes.”
I have to admit, trawling the Reddit Dilation Brigade subreddit has been one of my guilty pleasures during all of this. I’ve justified this by writing twice about them, but I did see one comment made by one of the trolls in that subforum, or maybe just normal person, just saying reality based things is indistinguishable from trolling these people, that stuck in my head. One of those dipshits made a comment that was something like.
The purpose of the Reddit Dilation Force is to win hearts and minds for Zelensky and Ukraine, and it’s working.
And his response was something like.
So Zelensky is winning hearts and minds while Putin wins the actual war. Got it.
There is something unambiguously enjoyable about seeing these propagandists just absolutely impotently seething about someone. And I’m not quite there yet, but it’s getting harder and harder to not just start Rutin for Putin.
The 74-year-old Republican, who started as a bodybuilder before reaching worldwide fame in action films, called on Putin to stop the invasion. He said thousands of Russian soldiers have been killed while their leaders have lied to them.
Arnold Schwarzenegger is famous because he lifted the really heavy things. And then he put the heavy things down and injected testosterone and HGH directly into his left buttcheek. And then he lifted the heavy things again and put them down. So of course I’m thrilled that he’s offering his opinion on geopolitical issues. I think it’s a good use of my time to hang on his every word.
Well he’s officially done it. Tom Brady has retired. As of February 1st he announced his retirement, and that’s it for –
JK. The 45 year old Official GOAT is coming back to get more brain damage. He’s decided that having 300+lbs men hit him as hard as they can for 22 years in a row, plus college, just wasn’t the kind of quality of life destroying CTE that he signed up for. For Fear of Missing Out he’s come back for yet another chance at crippling lifelong spinal injuries, back problems, and serious brain trauma.
Then again, Tom Brady must be getting some of those virgin goy-blood extractions that Mike Pompeo was getting. The guy appears to be entirely ageless, with more vigour at 45 than I have, turning 30 two days ago. That’s an exaggeration, but only by a touch. The guy appears to have found the fountain of youth and then, in a plot twist, simply used that to play football at a high level without sharing it with anyone else.
I was going to write another fake interview with Brady, like I did with Rams WR Cooper Kupp, but if I’m being honest I admire Brady too much for that. The guy is just simply amazing. Sex Symbol of Aryan Supremacy is supposed to be a joke, but it’s not even that far off.
Look I know it’s sportsball, but Brady transcends football. I am also aware that is a completely faggotty thing to say, but it’s true and I stand by it.
And besides, he has a hot wife. Who might have also found the anti-aging secret by the looks of things, because she remains a smokeshow in her 40’s.
British medical volunteers have claimed the Ukrainian army duped them into crossing the border before trying to conscript them as “cannon fodder” for the battle of Kyiv.
Carl Walsh and Ollie Funnell left the UK with the hope of putting their expertise to use treating casualties in the warzone, but were instead told they would be deployed to defend Ukraine’s besieged capital.
These guys are definitely a cut above the Reddit Dilation Brigade. After all, these guys are medics who went there to help people not die of wounds, combat or otherwise. It’s only a single notch ahead, because I mean what exactly did you expect, but this isn’t quite some seething psychopathic tranny who wanted to murder Russians and had a nervous breakdown after getting missile struck.
You love to see it. Even on that sub there are tons of trolls who are just straight up laughing at them. Moderation is getting hot and heavy.
Mr Walsh, 50, is a former combat medical technician from the Rhondda Valley in Wales and had met Mr Funnell, a paramedic turned teacher from Eastbourne, East Sussex, heading in the same direction at Krakow airport on March 11.
Speaking on Wednesday on the Polish side of the border with Ukraine, the new friends told The Telegraph they could hardly believe their ordeal had only lasted five days.
Both men contacted the Ukrainian embassy in the UK to offer their help after seeing the appeal by Volodymyr Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, for volunteers to join his country’s resistance against the Russian invaders, dubbed the international legion.
Throughout all their subsequent discussions with Ukrainian officials, the men claimed, assurances were given that there would be no expectation for them to fight, only to act as medics.
This all changed when they crossed the border on Saturday and found themselves being shuttled to the International Centre for Peacekeeping & Security – a military base used by Western volunteers – near the city of Lviv.
Mr Walsh, who served on military tours in Bosnia, Kosovo and Iraq during a 17-year career, said: “To join the international legion, the Ukrainians wanted to take our passports off us, sign a year contract, give us training for two days – 48 hours – and then within another 48 hours we would be fighting in Kyiv.”
By this point, Mr Walsh and Mr Funnell were travelling with a bigger group of volunteers, including several ex-military officers and a significant number of men with no combat experience.
‘It’s a death wish’
Carl Walsh and Ollie Funnel
It’s been interesting seeing the propaganda switch over the past few weeks. They’ve gone from hardcore “Ukraine will win,” to “here’s how Ukraine can still win,” to “okay it’s more like a stalemate but Vladimir is Badimir,” to “alright let’s be honest, Ukraine is a corrupt country with an evil government.”
Chalk this up to one of the stories I had in the chamber for a while, but didn’t get around to writing about until just recently, but I saw on BANG a certain retarded hitpiece put out by Vincent James’ outlet, the Daily Veracity. This was promoted by James himself on his telegram account.
While the piece itself is written by one “Jill Schrider,” who I can’t find any more information on, the Daily Veracity is Vincent James’ outlet.
Above we can see his Subscribe Star, where he proudly states himself as the Founder of Daily Veracity. And below we see his Rumble account, called “Daily Veracity with Vincent James.”
Vincent James is responsible for all the content on the Daily Veracity, whether he writes it or not. And just in case you think I’m taking a bit too strong of a stance, right beneath his telegram re-post of this article, he writes the following.
Before we even get into the meat of this article, is there anyone on the planet who believes that RAM, and Rob Rundo specifically, are getting paid by the feds? Is there anyone, anyone at all?
Put your hand down Anglin you biological failure. I’m talking about normal, well adjusted people.
I didn’t think so either. After all, it’s certainly quite the claim that Rob Rundo and RAM had the US government “send them money.” Surely there has to be some evidence, right?
The relationship between the U.S. government and the government of Ukraine has once again hit a snag. Uncovered reports of cooperation between U.S.-based neo-nazi groups and the Ukrainian Guard, a neo-nazi group calling themselves the Azov Battalion, have revealed an international extremist conspiracy, with the U.S. government’s hands all over it.
While the US government focuses on jailing and sanctioning right-wing dissidents in the US using the help of tech companies, uncovered documents reveal the US indirectly sent taxpayer dollars to neo-nazi groups and Charlottesville rioters abroad.
Why are we referring to our goys in Charlottesville as “rioters” now? That’s… quite the accusation. And I have to say, even before the text the article does not start off well, with the very first thing we see being the image below.
First of all, this idiot”Jill Schrider,” which sounds like a fake name BTW, gives us the above image, which got auto-resized on their site so hard that it’s nearly impossible to make out what the text is. The above pic is me taking a screencap of the image, directly from their site. This wouldn’t be so bad, except that they used red underline to highlight the supposedly damning parts. Which you can’t read because it’s so goddamn blurry.
Instead I had to download the image, and then look at it in its native resolution. Then I had to manually transcribe the text. Here is what is said in the above image, with the red underlined parts underlined by me as well.
ACTIVISM-ATHLETICS-VIRTUE… RIGHT SIDE.” RAM members also posted online a video showing Daley in the Ukraine performing a salute known to be associated with the western Hammerskins, a well-established violent white supremacy extremist group that is associated with RAM, and of which Daley was a member before co-founding RAM.
17. On August 1, 2018, an Instagram user “tagged” Right Brand Clothing’s account in a post containing a photograph of RAM members during their trip to Germany, Ukraine, and Italy meeting with Olena Semenyaka, the leader of the International Department for the National Corps, which is a political party in the Ukraine that was founded in 2016 out of a regiment of the Ukrainian military called the Azov Battalion. Based on my training and expertise, I know that the Azov Battalion is a paramilitary unit of the Ukranian[sic] National Guard which is known for its association with neo-Nazi idology and use of Nazi symbolism, and which is believed to have participated in training and radicalizing United States-based white supremacy organizations. The text associated with the post stated, “@rightbrandwear it was an honor to meet the singer and patriot from #818th #nationalist #blackmetal #ukraine #antiantifa.”
I’m starting to think that perhaps the image being unfocused and blurry was by design. First, nothing in the actual text accuses RAM of, well, anything yet, other than being tight with the Azov Battalion, and supporting a populist political party in the Ukraine. Second, the tone is that of some whiny soyim, talking about White Supreeeemacy in that soyim way. And finally, they randomly didn’t underline “Based on my,” for no apparent reason.
Look we are not getting off to a good start here, and it doesn’t get much better. I have to include their screencap of some jacobin piece, as well as the text that follows, so you can see how confusing this all is.
This means that funding of the Azov Battalion specifically designed for countering Russian influence within Ukraine, indirectly helped train one of the most prominent groups prosecuted after the 2017 Charlottesville rally.
It is important to note that the Rise Above Movement was heavily targeted by the US government for their skirmishes with mostly white Antifa in Charlottesville, VA, and Berkeley, CA.
It appears to be the case that now, the US government indirectly sent them a lot of money.
The Stanford Center for International Security and Cooperation published a detailed report regarding the connections between U.S. extremist groups and ultra-nationalist Ukrainian neo-nazi groups such as the Azov Battalion.
So we’re just going to highlight the part about the Christchurch shooter, Brenton Tarrant, for no reason whatsoever?
First they red underline some stuff that has nothing to do with anything. Then they highlight some stuff about Brenton Tarrant that has nothing to do with RAM. It’s difficult for me to even see the throughline here since the text and the images have nothing to do with each other. It’d be like if I was writing a piece on Anglin and included a picture of a nuclear submarine for no apparent reason, and never explained myself.
It appears to be the case that now, the US government indirectly sent them a lot of money.
But finally we get to what I believe to be the point, which is that the US government sent Rob Rundo a paycheck. Well not quite. Apparently he was “indirectly,” sent money.
The Stanford Center for International Security and Cooperation published a detailed report regarding the connections between U.S. extremist groups and ultra-nationalist Ukrainian neo-nazi groups such as the Azov Battalion.
Okay that sounds like the gayest of Democracy Class institutions, but I suppose they could be a valid source. Let’s see what they say.
RAM was hosted by Olena Semenyaka, head of the National Corps, the political wing of the Azov Battalion, a unit of the Ukrainian National Guard with neo-Nazi and white supremacist affiliations.[20] Semenyaka later stated that Rundo and his compatriots “came to learn our ways” and “showed interest in learning how to create youth forces in the ways Azov has.”[21] During their visit, the RAM members joined the Azov Battalion for sparring at the Reconquista Club, an mixed martial arts (MMA) club affiliated with the group.[22] Rundo entered an MMA competition for white supremacists from across Europe, supposedly the first American to take part in the history of the event.[23] While in Kiev, Rundo also got a tattoo of the Viking warrior logo of White Rex, a clothing label founded by Russian MMA fighter and Azov Battalion associate Denis Nikitin.[24] –CISAC
Uh, okay. How exactly is this “getting paid by the US government,” even indirectly? If it’s true that the US government indirectly funded the Azov Battalion, and then Rob Rundo joined them for some sparring, and an MMA tournament, I really don’t see what that has to do with anything. I mean, by that logic literally anyone is “indirectly funded by the US government.” Like, farmers are subsidized by the US government, so if you eat food you are getting money from the feds, indirectly. That’s the thing about “indirectly,” it’s kind of a bullshit term.
The confusion is only ratcheted up, because immediately following that we get the following embedded tweets. I’m screencapping them because I’ve learnt my lesson with tweets being deleted, but I’m also embedding them below, if you’re wondering why you’re seeing it twice.
— David J. Reilly 🇺🇸 (@realDaveReilly) March 7, 2022
It has been reported that Brenton Terrant, the shooter who carried out the infamous New Zeland Christchurch shooting, was sympathetic to the Ukrainian Azov Battalion — prominently displaying similar imagery as used by the group.
I swear to god I’m not editing this article. It really just leaps around constantly. We are now back to Brenton Tarrant, who is being revealed as an appreciator of “similar imagery.” Yeah that’s not quite the smoking gun that Jill Schrider believes it to be, nor does anyone care even if true.
RT uncovered these connections more than three years ago, detailing how the groups who have benefited from U.S. support helped train the same neo-nazi groups who participated in the Charlottesville riots of 2017.
Rob Rundo entered an MMA tournament and did a little sparring. That’s sort of not what most people would have in mind when they think of “training.” Besides that, what is with this “muh neo-natzees,” routine this broad is doing. Is Vincent James doing some sort of “Feds are the Real Neo-Natzees,” bit now?
Funding of the Azov Battalion was famously halted in 2018, then once again began soon after, before official policy banned the practice — only after Azov Battalion became fully integrated within the official Ukrainian military, where U.S. funds would no longer need acquire the explicit neo-nazi link.
She just keeps hammering this point, and it’s not in the way that any serious pro-White populist would. She’s not making the point that our (((Democracy Class))) is perfectly willing to side with whomever, ISIS, Azov Battalion, etcetera, if it accomplishes the geopolitical objectives of Globo Homo Schlomo. She’s doing this from the “muh neo-natzees,” perspective, which is really annoying.
The United States has for years funded, trained, and armed the Ukrainian regime, while inadvertently, through the support of groups like the Azov Battalion, given indirect support to extremists both within the U.S. and abroad.
That is the end of the article.
I know, I was as confused as you were. Go click the link at the top of the page and you can see for yourself. It just… ends.
But hey, Rob Rundo did some sparring with the Azov Battalion, and then he entered an MMA tournament. Oh and, I almost forgot, he got a tattoo. There is no evidence that he got paid for any of this, and at no point did the feds “send him money,” as Vincent James expliclitly said. But I guess he’s a fed now.
On the other hand Milo bragged about secretly recording the private conversations of people he was supposedly on the side of for years, and then selling that information to the feds and (((Roberta Kaplan))). So how does Vincent James feel about Milo?
Well he re-grams him constantly and tells his followers to follow him.
Ukraine’s Digital Ministry said crypto exchanges will operate legally and banks in the country will open accounts for them.
The country will be tasked with “determining the order of circulation of virtual assets” and issuing permits to providers.
A previous version of the bill was rejected by Zelensky in September 2021. The new bill was passed through Ukrainian parliament on Feb. 17, 2022.
Why It’s Important:Ukraine has received over $100 million in cryptocurrency donations to help with relief efforts during its war against Russia. Cryptocurrency funds have also been used to help support the military.
The legalization of cryptocurrency in Ukraine comes as more countries are speaking out either in favor of crypto or in favor of more regulation.
Crypto Currencies were banned in the Ukraine until earlier today. So what happened that they would be unbanned? How does it benefit (((Zelensky))) and his handlers to do this?
Ukraine, like many former Soviet states, has battled corruption and a severe dearth of international funding since gaining independence in 1991. So maybe that is why the Ukrainian government took the unusual step of tweeting out crypto wallet codes for global financing through both bitcoin and Ethereum – the two most popular digital tokens – from official accounts. “Stand with the people of Ukraine Now accepting cryptocurrency donations,” wrote Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine’s vice-prime minister, on 26 February. Non-profits and local businesses in the besieged country have mirrored the government’s request. The Kyiv Independent, an English language newspaper in the capital city, is accepting patronage through bitcoin.
Sure, the Ukraine is a completely corrupt country. However, I strongly doubt this is being done so that the little goy-peasants can outmaneuver Zelensky’s bureaucracies.
For the most ardent cryptocurrency diehards, the crisis in Ukraine is a perfect encapsulation of the reasons why they believe the global economic hegemony needs to be broken up. The Ukrainian people need help, and they argue that bitcoin’s ability to eschew bureaucratic red tape is the best way to provide immediate service to a vulnerable population. “It’s just the cheapest, fastest and most secure way to transact financially,” says Artemis, who declined to offer his real name but says he is from Canada and donated $280 in bitcoin to Come Back Alive. “They can safely store it without any fear of the invading force stealing it, or the banking system collapsing due to war.”
I will never make bold, speculative proclamations on this site, and I’m telling you right now that I don’t know for sure what’s going on here. Having said that, this seems like a great way for the parasite class in Ukraine to get their money out. Use the Ukrainian Hyrvnia (their dollar) to buy bitcoin. Then, no matter where in the world you are, your money is stored with your bitcoin wallet and can’t be seized by the Russians unless they torture your passwords out of you.
If the owner is not physically captured, this allows them to retain all of their existing wealth without even having a bank account. At the right moment, they can then start selling their bits into whatever currency they fancy. Zelensky and his oligarchs could have just bought foreign currency, but then they would need to have bank accounts, just in different countries. That’s the old way of laundering your stolen money. Doable, but complicated and inconvenient.
It’s nothing conclusive, but couple this with Zelensky being praised for admitting how hopeless the situation is, and it looks like the Ukrainian (((Parasite Class))) is heading for the exits.
More than 7,000 kilometres away, the guest of honour sat somewhere in the middle of a war zone. Standing on the floor of the House of Commons, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau introduced “our friend” Volodymyr Zelensky, president of Ukraine.
This is gonna be a hard one to sit through.
“Volodymyr, in the years I’ve known you, I’ve always thought of you as a champion for democracy,” Trudeau said. “And now democracies around the world have you as our champion.”
Kill me now.
The MPs, senators and invited guests in attendance stood and applauded for nearly a full minute.
A full minute of applause. For the jew actor with homoerotic toilet humour.
But friendship means being able to speak directly and candidly — and that is what Zelensky did in his 12-minute address.
Our Democracy Class dipshits give this disgusting zionist filth a minute long applause and he follows that up by berating them. The sheer level of entitlement of this kikel is beyond belief.
Zelensky asked Canadians to “imagine” their own country being attacked. Addressing the prime minister as “Justin,” Zelensky asked Trudeau to imagine that it was his children hearing the impact of bombs falling on the airport in Ottawa.
What if an invading country was laying siege to Vancouver? What if the CN Tower was being bombed? What if Canadian flags were being ripped down by soldiers occupying Montreal? What if Edmonton was left undefended against aerial attacks? What if Canadian schools were the ones being bombed, Canadian children the ones being killed?
What if this invading army was burning Canadian churches down to the ground? Oh wait, that happened. Except it wasn’t an invading army it was antifa/abo activists because of a completely fake hoax about children being murdered at residential schools. No hate crime charges were laid, of course.
“Can you imagine when you call your friends and nations and you ask to please close the sky, close the air space, please stop the bombing?” Zelensky asked. “How many more cruise missiles have to fall on our cities until you make this happen? And in return, they express their deep concerns about the situation … and they say, ‘Please hold on, hold on a little longer.'”
I don’t remember any of this saccharine bullshit when our churches were being burned to the ground, such as this one pictured above, which is less than 20 km from where I am penning this piece. Nor do I remember any of this when Israel murdered 232 Palestinian Goyim when stealing their land as part of a violent racial cleansing. Turns out some people are more worthy of sympathy than others.
Zelensky still ended his remarks by saying how grateful he was to the Canadian people.
“I am confident that, together, we will overcome and we will be victorious,” he said. “Glory to Ukraine. Thank you to Canada.”
His audience in the House stood and applauded him for three minutes.
Three. Fucking. Minutes. For a guy who jailed the leader of the opposition, shut down the three largest television news companies in the country, possibly stole the election he “won”, and has done nothing, literally nothing to address the rampant corruption endemic in Ukraine that got him elected, assuming he even won in the first place. A three minute standing ovation.
War has transformed Zelensky into a folk hero.
Isn’t the point of folk heroes that they aren’t real? Or am I thinking of folk tales? Nevermind, it’s fairy tales, although Zelensky being some sort of hyper competent war president is not far removed.
As recently as February 21, the chief editor of the Kyiv Independent was suggesting that Zelensky, a former comedian and actor, was “in over his head.” Writing in the New York Times, Olga Rudenko explained how a once-inspiring candidate had become a “dispiritingly mediocre” president.
“After his nearly three years in office, it’s clear what the problem is,” she wrote. “Mr. Zelensky’s tendency to treat everything like a show.”
I have been cautioned by the wise autists at FTN to refrain from supporting Putin. He is after all essentially just a mafia boss running a country, and while I can’t put my finger on exactly how patriotic he is or is not, he certainly doesn’t mind jew oligarchs exploiting the Russian People. Having said all that, boy is it ever hard to not just straight up root for Russia to militarily crush ZOG in the most brutal and humiliating manner possible. I mean I hope that entails nobody dying, but I just can’t stand these people.
I’ve remarked on the staggering incompetence of the Ukraine Gov right from the very start. Their military is a complete failure from top to bottom. This is probably because their (((leadership))) is concerned with exploiting the Ukrainian People, and absolutely nothing else, but it could also be just plain old fashioned incompetence. Zelensky is after all, a complete clown, and there’s something really satisfying about Putin crushing the “Champion of Democracy,” and grinding him into dust. If Putin puts Zelensky on trial for war crimes and has him executed, I’m officially going full Rutin for Putin.
But in his bunker in Ukraine — from where he has now addressed the European, British and Canadian parliaments — he no doubt understands this is not a moment for triumphalism. In his speech to Canadian leaders, the Western world’s “champion” stressed the horrors of war and the limits of the allied response to date.
I simply cannot deny that I have thoroughly enjoyed the propaganda shift from “Russia is incompetent and losing,” to “here’s how Ukraine can still win,” to “get excited for new atrocity propaganda hoax,” and “Zelensky is great because he’s losing so gracefully.”
A full minute of applause. For the jew actor with homoerotic toilet humour.
