ClownWorld is omnipresent, and very interested in your children’s buttholes. No matter where they go they’ll get groomed by drag pedos, discord troons, or even their teachers. Are there any safe activities for our kids to do these days?
What’s this? An NGO that appears to exist purely to facilitate children’s playtime outside. That sounds like a wonderful idea! Let’s see what they’ve been getting up to.
“Decoding Whiteness,” apparently.
They deleted that tweet, but what remains is almost as bad in its own way.
Let’s check back in with those schools.
The story is from 2021, but the point remains. The Gravocaust is absurdly fake, which is why they have to throw hissyfits every time someone pushes back on their slander. And of course, the consubversatives are silent as the grave on this issue, despite being against “muh wokesters,” or whatever.
Speaking of consubversatives, here we see the uncensored Ryan O’Connor. He’s assblasted over Trudeau’s Public Health Officer, Theresa Tam, and her new report on “systemic drivers of negative health outcomes.”
You, a natzee, may have noticed that she mentioned “white supremacy, colonialism, and racism.” But the consubversatives are far too anti-White opposed to identity politics – except for Jews – so they don’t care about that. Instead, the problem is that the totally corporate owned shitlibs are secretly anti-capitalist, because they say so.
I’m too tired for any commentary. The chess speaks for itself.
Recently, a Canadian politician stated that it feels like everything is broken in Canada right now. But is Canada broken? On behalf of the National Post, we surveyed Canadians from January 20 to 22, 2023 to learn more about their perceptions.
SOME OF THE KEY HIGHLIGHTS OF OUR IS CANADA BROKEN? SURVEY INCLUDE…
67% of Canadians agree with the statement made by a Canadian politician who stated that “it feels like everything is broken in this country right now”.
50% of Canadians are angry with the way Canada is being managed today.
68% of Canadians report that rising costs and inflation/interest rates are most important when it comes to the issues impacting them and their families.
37% of Canadians believe that the state of health care is the issue that governments and decision makers in their province are focused on the most.
I always take polling with a huge grain of salt. The way that questions are framed plays a huge part in the answers that you get. One strong example of this was when they asked Americans if they would support a no-fly zone in Ukraine, and they got a strongly positive. Then they asked them if they supported the US shooting down Russian planes to enforce this, and the answer was overwhelmingly negative. But that’s the exact same question.
Recent polling on whether or not Americans favor a no-fly zone over Ukraine has showed that citizens are in favor of the idea, but when those polled are told what the definition and implications of a no-fly zone are, support substantially wanes.
Supporters of the no-fly zone were at 40 percent of those polled, while opponents were at 25 percent. However, Yahoo! News reports, the numbers switched once respondents were told that a no-fly zone means that NATO would engage in war with Russia, shooting down their planes over Ukrainian air space.
Support for the measure dropped to a mere 23 percent, while opposition rose to 43 percent, once Americans learned that a no-fly zone would mean war with Russia. Much of this shift came from Republicans polled, “who went from supporting a no-fly zone by a 22-point margin (48% to 26%), to opposing it by a 38-point margin (55% to 17%).”
On top of this, the poll was an online poll. There are better and worse ways to conduct those, but I’d take everything with even more skepticism in this case. Further evidence for the lack of seriousness is the respondents putting global warming ahead of crime as something that they are worried about. It’s possible that there are a genuine collection of retarded NPCs who are worried about that nonsense. It’s also possible that there are people responding in the opposite direction, meaning they’re worried that global warming bullshit will be used to justify stealing more of their taxdollars and driving up the cost of living at the gas pump, and the pollsters didn’t create an option for them. That’s the thing with polls, the pollster influences the results.
Nevertheless, I’ve always had to push back on these memes, based though they can be, which show that politicians constantly lie to the public to get elected. Sure, they lie occasionally, but for the most part the political parties being oligopolies means that they don’t have to ever put something truly populist on the table. The above meme is somewhat true, the below one, not at all.
Part of the reason why people sense that the political system is broken is because we can see the clear and obvious nepotism in the highest of places. Justin Trudeau’s daddy was Prime Minister. The Clinton’s are a dynasty, despite everyone hating them. No one cares about Meghan McCain. Donald Trump was born wealthy. The list goes on. And the politicians who come from more normal backgrounds are these obsequious little puppets that people hate even more.
Yes, this is the Conservative Party of Canada.
Again, take the results of the poll with a grain of salt. But it’s clear, poll or not, that people aren’t happy with this bullshit system they live under. Of course people believe that everything in this country is broken, because the parasite class is working against their interests.
The hard part is not convincing them that there is a parasitical club ruling over them that they’re not invited to. The hard part is getting organized and doing something about it.
Russia’s parliament has passed the third and final reading of a law banning “LGBT propaganda” among all adults, as Moscow ramps up its conservative push at home amid the war in Ukraine that passed the nine-month mark on Thursday.
From Russia’s perspective we can look at this one of two different ways. First, we assume that this is totally cynical. The Russian higher ups don’t care, but know that the people want this and need more support for the war effort. Second, we assume that this is totally uncynical, and that they were going to do this anyway, simply because the Russian government is run by patriots. The truth is sort of immaterial. What’s important is that everyone understand that this is what’s in the interest of the health of a nation, as well as what is popular.
The bill criminalises any act regarded as an attempt to promote what Russia calls “non-traditional sexual relations” – in film, online, advertising or in public – and expands on a notorious 2013 law that banned “propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations” among minors and was used to detain gay rights activists.
Notorious == fantastic. Gay Rights Activists == groomers.
Under the new law, individuals can be fined up to 400,000 roubles (£5,400) and organisations 5m roubles (£68,500) for “propagandising nontraditional sexual relations”, while foreigners could face up to 15 days’ arrest and expulsion from Russia.
Human rights groups and LGBTQ+ activists say the extension of the law means any act or public mention of same-sex relationships is functionally being outlawed.
The Russian president, Vladimir Putin, is expected to sign the bill in the coming days.
When are these “human rights groups” going to demand that the people who lied us into Iraq be punished in some way? Oh right, never, because they’re not really human rights organizations, they’re anti-White groomers who pretend to be really nice, kindhearted people when they are anything but.
Russia’s upper house of parliament unanimously voted on Wednesday to toughen a controversial law banning what the bill describes as “LGBT propaganda,” making it apply to Russians of all ages.
The bill has to be signed into law by Russian President Vladimir Putin after being passed by the Federation Council. It passed the lower house of parliament, the State Duma, on November 24.
The law proposes to ban all Russians from promoting or “praising” homosexual relationships or publicly suggesting that they are “normal.” It also prohibits “propaganda” of pedophilia and gender reassignment in advertising, books, films.
Imagine if our parliament unanimously voted in support of something like this. Instead, we get the zionist-catlady axis of evil venemously seething at the Russian ambassador for showing his support.
Ottawa (AFP) – Canada’s foreign minister on Monday ordered her officials to summon Russia’s ambassador in Ottawa, Oleg Stepanov, over a series of “hateful” anti-LGBTQ tweets including one aimed at an openly lesbian federal minister.
The embassy posted the messages on Twitter in recent days after Russian lawmakers approved a bill banning all forms of LGBTQ “propaganda” that critics say ramps up a crackdown on “non-traditional” sexual relationships, affecting everything from books and films to social media posts.
“Unsurprisingly, the Russians have once again chosen hateful propaganda,” Foreign Minister Melanie Joly’s deputy director of communications, Emily Williams, said in a statement.
“This is an attack on the Canadian values of acceptance and tolerance. Minister Joly has directed Global Affairs Canada to summon the Russian ambassador to tell him as much,” she said.
Melanie Joly
You would not believe how hard it is to track down the “offending” tweets. I wasted a solid twenty minutes because none of these propagandists bothered linking to the original tweet.
This prompted the lesbian Minister of Sports (lol) to seethe in public.
Which prompted whomever runs the Russian Ambassador to Canada twatter account to respond in kind.
They seem to have gotten into it with Randy Boissonnault, who is the Liberal Party Minster of Tourisn and Associate Minister of Finance, as well as being a guy with a monkeypox groomerpox flag in his bio.
The Russians double down on the “no, you’re a bunch of sick perverts,” line.
And just when I was about to fully support them they go ahead and do something spiritually ghey like the following.
“Libs R Real Natzees.”
Anyway, back to the attempted bullying by catlady Melanie.
“We absolutely can’t tolerate this rhetoric … This is an attack on the Canadian values of acceptance and tolerance.”
It’s the third time Ambassador Oleg Stepanov has been summoned by Joly this year.
Well if the first two times didn’t accomplish anything I’m sure it will magically be entirely different this time.
Joly’s office said the ambassador will be expected to explain the tweet directed at St-Onge.
What is this elementary school? They’re being asked to explain what they meant by a tweet that had the groomer flag crossed out? Okay so what if they say “go fuck yourself.” Is this dumb broad going to actually do anything about it?
Artur Wilczynski, an openly gay former Canadian ambassador to Norway and a LGBTQ rights campaigner, said he was shocked by the tweets put out by the Russian embassy.
“It was a direct attack not only on the LGBTQ2+ community but it was a shot across the bow in terms of Canada’s domestic framework, in terms of protecting human rights,” he said.
“To see this coming out from a mission accredited to Canada was just a step too far and I thought was, quite frankly, a fairly direct attack on our values and on our country.”
Wilczynski said he took the image of a crossed-out pride flag as a “direct threat.”
I’m not even going to bother responding to that, especially when Russia released their statement on the matter.
The Embassy was surprised to note the Global Affairs Canada’s publication supporting the Statement by the so-called “Equal Rights Coalition” with regard to adoption in Russia of a Federal Law aimed at preservation of traditional values. We would like to make a few comments in this regard.
The new legislation prohibits propaganda that promotes same-sex sexual relations or preferences, as well as pedophilia and information encouraging gender reassignment surgery.
Canada and a range of other States-supporters of the neoliberal agenda are deliberately distorting the reality by conflating the concepts of individual sexual preferences and universal human rights. Fortunately, there are no universally acknowledged international documents in place that would establish such a status for any relations that are different from a traditional family structure (a kind reminder that we are considering a natural family of procreation, which refers to a social unit of two male and female parents and their potential children).
It is important to reiterate that there is no discrimination in Russia with respect to the rights of sexual and other kind of minorities. However, it is well-known fact that a person’s freedom ends where another man’s freedom begins. We believe that non-traditional relations propaganda, let alone their criminally prosecuted perverted forms (such as pedophilia), infringes the rights of traditional majority of the Russian citizens willing to protect themselves and their children from being imposed with precepts that are alien to their spiritual and moral values.
Finally, the Embassy would like to recall a famous quote by the former Prime Minister of Canada Pierre Elliott Trudeau stating that “there is no place for the State in the bedrooms of the Nation”. It would be very timely now to follow it up with an equally important comment: “there is no place for a bedroom in the Government”. Individual sexual preferences of adults and details of their relations should remain strictly personal. It should not become a political matter, especially international relations’ agenda topic.
P.S.: Our country is not interfering in the Canadian domestic affairs. It is up to the Canadian authorities and citizens to make decisions in this field. We do expect from the Justin Trudeau’s Cabinet corresponding respectful attitude towards the legislative process in Russia based on the national State Policy to preserve and strengthen traditional values and the will of the Russian people.
I fully support anti-groomer legislation like this. I do think that the Russian propaganda is too focused on “gotcha” type stuff with respect to our Democracy Class. A much shorter statement, and one highlighting how harmful, vicious, and ridiculous these people are would be much better. But frankly, I’ve come to accept them being milquetoast fence sitters with poor propaganda. What’s more relevant is how utterly insane our government is.
I can’t get over how dumb, gay, and performative these people are. The Canadian Government is borderline at war with Russia, but this Melanie Joly chick makes a huge deal out of talking to the Russian ambassador for the third time to scold him about his country pushing anti-groomer legislation. This isn’t going to accomplish anything, but they’re doing it anyway because they’re so assblasted.
Nearly 20 years of progress on Canadian violent crime have effectively been erased as the country emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic with a homicide rate worse than any time since the mid-2000s.
A total of 788 people were murdered in Canada in 2021, according to new data released this week by Statistics Canada. What’s more, nearly a quarter of those murders were gang-related; the highest raw number of gang homicides since the federal government started tracking it in 2005.
Canada’s rising murder rate is the most reliable indicator yet of a Canada that is continuing to experience an across-the-board surge in violent crime.
That is indeed true. There are a lot of ways for a malicious government to not prosecute crimes. They can refuse to count petty theft as a crime, they can play down assaults, they can use very “progressive” interpretation of crimes to simply not prosecute their golems of colour. We see extreme examples of this with the Soros prosecutors in the US. I’m sure we have many of these same types here in Canada, we just haven’t documented them yet.
What they can’t do is fail to properly count the dead bodies.
This helpful graph from National Post, using StatsCan data, tells the story well. As of 2019 there was a huge push to not count any crime they can get away with. That’s probably why they can claim that the non-violent crime has gone down. It hasn’t, they just stopped counting things.
In August, Statistics Canada reported that while property crime was on the downswing, there was a noticeable rise in the numbers of Canadians being raped, harassed, stabbed or assaulted.
Again, they claim that property crime is on the downswing, but why would that be? We can’t say for sure, but my money is on them just not prosecuting people for property crimes.
In 2021, there was an 18 per cent surge in “level one” sexual assault; a term used to describe assaults that compromise the sexual integrity of the victim, but result in minor physical injuries. Hate-motivated crimes, meanwhile, rose by 27 per cent.
And yet, the antifas who burned down our churches have been charged with no hate crimes. So that particular stat means nothing, only that the police departments have been told to increase political persecution of White People, Christians, non-perverts, and above all else, Goyim.
Vancouver, for instance, has witnessed a sharp rise in reported violence, particularly in the realm of unprovoked stranger assaults and anti-Asian hate crimes. Despite posting some of the highest violent crime rates in a decade, Vancouver Police still suspect that many incidents are never being brought to their attention.
This is the same Vancouver Police Department that refused to label two antifas throwing paint on a church a hate crime.
This is also the police department that watched non-perverts at the “Pride Parade,” get assaulted by some tranny right in front of them, and literally said to me “what do you expect me to do, arrest them right now?”
Since murders rarely escape the attention of Canadian law enforcement, they are generally considered the most accurate gauge of violent crime trends.
And they’re going up and up.
The only reason they were so high in the 80’s was the exact same soft on Crime-Americans policies back then.
Canada also easily ranks as one of the least homicidal countries in the Western Hemisphere. Last year, Jamaica saw a murder rate that was more than 22 times higher than that of Canada’s.
Wonder why that is?
But don’t ever feel like you’re in danger of missing out. They’ll bring Jamaica to you.
Canada’s government is targeting individual investors with a new triple-A rated bond to help Ukraine and is asking bond dealers to make significant efforts to market it to them, according to a memo from the finance department.
The so-called Ukraine Sovereignty Bond will be in effect a five-year government security of Canada, which will lend the proceeds to the Ukrainian government at the same interest rate to help fund basic services such as pension payment. The securities will have the same rating as Canada’s top-rated regular bonds.
Wait, we’re lending this to the Ukraine government? We’re not just giving them the money?
This seems like signalling on steroids. The Canadian Government isn’t even giving the bonds to the Ukraine government, or rather they are, they’re just giving the entire bond. Either this is a long, drawn out ploy to have the Ukraine Government default on their bond obligations, in which case this is a giveaway to Zelensky, or this is a total waste of everybody’s time.
The push to get retail investors to buy the debt underscores the government’s desire to go beyond just financial support for Ukraine: it’s also to show broad Canadian support for the country in its fight with Russia, according to the memo to bond dealers seen by Bloomberg.
Considering the language it appears to be a total waste of time. This is all but confirmed later in the article.
Canada becomes the first country outside of Ukraine to offer a bond for purchase in support of embattled nation. The government will provide a loan to Ukraine equivalent to the proceeds from the bond sale, according to a statement issued by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau earlier on Friday.
The debt offering comes in addition to C$2 billion ($1.47 billion) in Canadian financial assistance to Ukraine so far this year.
Travelers, regardless if they’re Canadian citizens or not, will no longer have to submit public health information through an application the government launched for travelers before or after they enter the country, provide proof of vaccination, go through pre- or on-arrival testing, quarantine or isolate, or monitor and report if they’ve developed COVID-19 symptoms when arriving in Canada, the country’s public health agency said.
Additionally, the Canadian government said travelers will no longer be required to wear masks on planes and trains, adding that it strongly recommends people “wear high-quality and well-fitted masks during their journeys.”
I didn’t do any flying since Covid-19 started, with the exception of my Active Club trip. Putting a mask on my face for hours on a flight was annoying, and my sympathies go out to those who had to wear these things constantly. It’s also nice to be able to leave the country and then come back despite being not-boosted, although this came just after I missed a sibling trip just across the border.
At the start of the pandemic in 2020, Canada and the U.S. closed their respective borders to help stop the spread of COVID-19.
No actually shutting down the border was called “xenophobic HuWhyte Supreeeemacy,” and was only done nine months into Covid-19.
“Since the beginning of the pandemic, the Government of Canada has taken a layered approach to border management to protect the health and safety of Canadians,” the health agency said Monday in a press release. “As the pandemic situation has continued to evolve, adjustments to border measures have been informed by the latest evidence, available data, operational considerations and the epidemiological situation, both in Canada and internationally.”
“Thanks largely to Canadians who have rolled up their sleeves to get vaccinated, we have reached the point where we can safely lift the sanitary measures at the border,” Canadian Minister of Health Jean-Yves Duclos said. “However, we expect COVID-19 and other respiratory viruses will continue to circulate over the cold months, so I encourage everyone to stay up-to-date with their COVID-19 vaccination, including booster doses, and exercise individual public health measures.”
Our Covid-19 rules were never based on any sort of material reality. That’s why they said that you can’t hang out with your family, or be closer than six feet from someone, but BLM “Fiery, but mostly peaceful protests,” were totally fine. That’s why quarantines, which are a totally valid way of fighting an illness, were bizarrely done on the honour system with different rules for air travel, as opposed to being run by the government at their expense. That’s why –
I could go on, but I’ve said what I needed to say and said it better before. The WMD Liars have gotten what they wanted from the Waifu Flu. They’ve moved on to new pastures, like stealing your tax dollars and giving it to “Ukraine,” where by Ukraine we mean the Zelensky’s who currently run their illegitimate government.
Some tiny number of NPCs are seething right now, but most of them have moved on to the next political product to consoom.
If you spend any time on social media, it’s likely that you’ve seen this graphic compiled by columnist Stephen Lautens that assembles 11 international indices which feature Canada near the top spot. “Canada is broken? I don’t think so. Neither does the world,” reads a caption.
They link to the graphic created by Stephen Lautens actually refers us to one Bradley West. The graphic is a bit hard to make out, but it has such nebulous terms as “Quality of Life,” where Canada places first, and “Most economically influential cities in the World,” of which Toronto places 10th.
Stephen Lautens is a typical Globo Homo Enjoyer, with a face that looks like it doesn’t know what to do with itself, what with not being currently stuffed into a locker.
Bradley West appears to be no better, and his twitter is full of stuff like this.
You hear that goy, you are not a drop in the ocean, you are the entire ocean. I don’t really know what this means, but boy am I ever inspired to not just slay the dragon, but be the treasure. And I love how my random and intentionally stupid inspirational quote that I just thought up accidentally turned out to be kind of badass, and possibly actually mean something.
Naturally, it only tells a partial picture. While Canada may dominate abstract indices such as “quality of life” and “peace,” there are plenty of far more empirical indicators in which we measurably rank as among the worst in the developed world.
There’s plenty to like about Canada, but below is a not-at-all comprehensive list of all the ways in which we are indeed very broken.
Tristin Hopper, the National Post columnist, makes largely the same point that I do. Then again, he also looks like this, and his profile shows his last piece whining about “anti-semitism,” in the Laith Marouf affair that I covered previously.
So I guess he’s just looking good through proximity to pure retardation.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is essentially a club of the world’s 38 most developed countries. And when these 38 are ranked against each other for housing unaffordability, Canada emerges as the clear champion. OECD analysts rank affordability by comparing average home prices to average incomes, and according to their latest quarterly rankings Canada was No. 1 for salaries that were most out of whack with the cost of a home.
Tristan includes this far too low resolution image provided by the OECD, which shows Canada, The Great White North, being the undisputed champs of people not being able to afford a home.
Every year, the Finnish telecom analyst Rewheel ranks the world’s most expensive countries for wireless services. And last year, Canada once again dominated. Across several metrics, Canada was found to be the most expensive place in the world for mobile data. Analysts found that it would cost the average Canadian the equivalent of at least 100 Euros to obtain a cell phone plan with at least 100 gigabytes of mobile data. Across much of the EU, that kind of cell phone plan could be had for less than 40 Euros.
NUMBER ONE! NUMBER ONE! NUMBER ONE! Suck it rest of the World. Enjoy missing out on the exquisite pleasure of having your eyes ripped out by your phone service provider.
Canada’s health system was particularly walloped by COVID-19 due to the simple fact that most of our hospitals are at the breaking point even in good times. Multiple times during the pandemic, provinces were forced into shutdown by rates of COVID that had barely been noticed in better-prepared countries. A ranking by the Canadian Institute for Health Information provides one clue as to why. When ranked against peer countries, Canada’s rate of per-capita acute care beds was in last place, albeit tied with Sweden. Canada has two acute care beds for every 1,000 people, against 3.1 in France and six in Germany.
I’m sorry did I just hear that we finished first yet again?
Nothing gets me more pumped than not being able to get a hospital bed because the government is too busy spending that money on fake refugees. Or maybe because they’re overflowing with MonkeyPox Enjoyers.
The COVID-19 pandemic ushered in the most feverish global accumulation of debt in the history of human civilization. So it’s rather remarkable that amidst this international monsoon of debt, Canada still managed to out-debt everyone else. Last year, analysts at Bloomberg tracked each country’s rate of public and private debt accumulated during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Canada came in with an overall debt burden equivalent to 352 per cent of GDP. While a handful of countries (Japan, France and Hong Kong) came out of the pandemic with higher overall debt burdens, Canada outranked all of them when it came to how quickly that debt had been accumulated.
Oh fuck ya buds.
The surest sign of a country heading in the right direction is when people are loaded up to their eyeballs in debt as they vainly try to maintain a lifestyle that’s far out of reach for them. God bless the Koshervatives, Trudeau, and everyone who managed to make this possible.
Last year — just as the global supply chain crisis got going — the World Bank decided to rank the performance of the world’s 370 major ports. Authors weighed factors such as how long the ports kept ships waiting, and how long crews took to unload a vessel. And when everything was added together, the Port of Vancouver ranked 368 out of 370. The only places with worse scores were the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach. And it’s not like our other ports are much better. If Vancouver is too gummed up, you can always sail north to Prince Rupert, which ranks 339 out of 370.
Being in the 0.6th percentile is nice. It’s a start, but we can do better. I want so much diversity at these ports that literally nothing gets done. Not some gay little delays, I want the Vancouver Port to be a monument to a failed civilization. Only then will I be satisfied.
Flight delays are another category in which basically the entire world is feeling the pinch. And yet, Canada still managed to outdo all of them. Last month, CNN used data from the website FlightAware to figure out which airports were seeing the highest rates of flight delays. In the number one spot was Toronto Pearson, with 52 per cent of all flights out of the airport experiencing some kind of delay. And it was a commanding lead; the second-place finisher, Frankfurt, only managed to see 45.4 per cent of its flights delayed. Toronto was also a contender in flight cancellations; with 6.9 per cent of its scheduled flights never getting off the ground, it ranked fourth worst in the world.
See! This is what I’m talking about Port of Vancouver. It’s not enough to have some delays, you need to be number one. We want people all over the World to experience the pleasure of being stuck in Toronto Pearson forever, but even worse since they’re on a boat at port. Make it happen Trudeau, we’re all counting on you.
The article somewhat loses the plot next, since he whines that Canada is unfriendly to foreign investment (based) and Canada has the most fuel guzzling motor vehciles (double based). But what can I say, if koshervatives could actually get the point, we wouldn’t need to exist, now would we?
It’s hard for me to start this with anything other than a screenshot. You might not believe me otherwise when I say that this is the official Canadian Federal Government.
Let’s take a closer look at that quote.
“We can’t combat white supremacy unless we can teach people to love justice. You have to love justice more than your allegiance to your race, sexuality and gender. It is about justice.” – bell hooks (1952-2021)
Our efforts to advance Anti-Racism can only be truly realized with recognition of the unjust consequences of white-settler colonialism, our continued commitment to decolonization, and incessant striving to advance reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples in Canada. Given the immigration system’s historical and ongoing impact on the colonization of Indigenous Peoples, we bear the duty of maintaining the memory of the dispossession of Indigenous lands and the responsibility to seek creative ways of demonstrating our solidarity with Indigenous People’s struggles for recognition.
This is the very first paragraph on the very first page after the introduction. It’s also ridiculous in more ways than one. First of all, how are these Aboriginals helped by mass migration? Can anyone answer that question?
Of course not, because they aren’t. If you view these policies through the lense of hurting White People it makes perfect sense. Then again, they barely try to hide that, considering the very first page quoted some anti-White pseudo-intellectual going on about combating HuWhyte Supreemacy.
We would like to begin by acknowledging that the lands on which many of us live, work and gather, including the digital infrastructure enabling our work, are on the traditional territories of Indigenous nations. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)’s regional and international offices are also situated on a number of Indigenous territories’ throughout the country and abroad. We acknowledge that our national headquarters in Ottawa are on the unceded and unsurrendered territory of the Anishnaabe Algonquin nation whose presence here reaches back to time immemorial.
We respect the enduring presence and longstanding ties that Indigenous Peoples have to this land where we reside and flourish, however and whenever we may have come and settled. In recognition of the many and different territorial lands that each reader may be coming from, we encourage you to do your research and learn about the territory on which you reside. Explore how you can recognize the history of settler expansion and uplift the equity and sovereignty of Indigenous Peoples in your own way. We all share in the responsibility as Canadians—as Treaty peoples—to maintain respectful relationships with Indigenous Peoples.
That’s all a bunch of anti-White gibberish, but the part I bolded is especially important. The territory on which you reside is Canada, not the Musquean nation, or whatever. But the occupation government of Canada does not view Canada as a legitimate nation. They’ll also call you treasonous for disagreeing with any of their stupid and malicious pet issues, and especially for voicing your grievances in public.
Page three is a message from the Acting Deputy Minister of Immigration, Caroline Xavier. It’s exactly what you’d expect, so feel free to read just the bolded parts.
In 2020—2021 , Canadians experienced a reckoning: We took stock of the disconnect between our values of equality and the entrenched reality of racism in our everyday lives and workplaces. Our lives will be forever marked by the inequities that could no longer be ignored given the differential impacts of COVID-19, the surge of anti-Asian hate crimes during the pandemic, and the rising voices of Indigenous Peoples, Black, racialized and marginalized people in Canada who reignited the global movement against racism in the wake of the murder of George Floyd in the United States in May 2020. These events gave new impetus to efforts being made in the federal government as in other spheres of Canadian society, to reflect, re-think and decisively stand up against racism.
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) was among the first organizations in Canada to set up a dedicated team to provide Anti-Racism guidance to senior management and employees during this time. IRCC’s Anti-Racism Task Force, established in July 2020, outlined a strategy (subsequently articulated as Anti-Racism Strategy 1.0) to launch the Department on the path to building the foundations for the generational work required to eradicate racism in our policies, operations and people management practices. From the outset, we acknowledged that our work would require nothing less than a paradigm shift in the mindset of employees and senior management alike in how we foster and safeguard a culture of equity. We also knew that we would have to expand circles of discussion and engagement across multiple venues of dialogue within IRCC in order to empower employees and equip them with the required resources and tools, while simultaneously establishing mechanisms of management accountability for effecting long-lasting culture change. The employee-driven transitioning of IRCC toward a hybrid workplace also –
I actually don’t know what “hybrid workplace,” means. If someone can let me know that would be great.
– heightened the need to listen to some employees’ concerns about returning to workplaces due to fears of micro-aggressions and made us take additional steps to ensure our workplace is welcoming. We centered our reflections and actions on the crucial linkage between Anti-Racism in our workplace and Anti-Racism in our policies and program delivery to demonstrate, not only in words but also in actions, that “Anti-Racism is as Anti-Racism does”; that we are not content with merely setting an objective of “not being racist”; we are committed to being actively, creatively and tirelessly anti-racist.
Anti-Racism Strategy 2.0 (2021—2024) is part of our commitment to step up the initiatives for building an equitable and inclusive organization to benefit all people in Canada. With the proportion of Indigenous, Black and other racialized people projected to reach more than 40 percent of the working-age population in Canada by the end of the decade, the Strategy is an initial step to moving the Department to the forefront of fulfilling the promise of Canada as a truly diverse and inclusive country. It brings into focus and complements the burgeoning Anti-Racism actions spearheaded by senior management and employees at all levels of the Department since Strategy 1.0 was first released in Spring 2021. This iteration of the Strategy builds on extensive consultations with a broad spectrum of policy-makers, employees and allies across the Department and Government of Canada. It strengthens the overarching structure of the multiple departmental actions to create more strategic organizational change and to ensure that the applied principles and frameworks are consistent and sustainable.
The Anti-Racism Strategy Action Plan, the Anti-Racism Accountability and Transparency Framework and the Equality and Anti-Racism Systems Change Framework that drive our Anti-Racism work are the key elements that will clearly identify measurable goals, timeframes for results, key responsible departmental stakeholders, accountability mechanisms, change agents and processes to implement the Strategy. Our objective in sharing this iteration is to invite broader circles of government and non-government stakeholders and partners into the conversation on our shared Anti-Racism journey. We look forward to incorporating their feedback as we continue to improve and refine our strategic approach to the transformative changes of the Department.
At the early stages of this journey, we are mindful that there is no room for complacency; combatting systemic racism will require all the resources and attention we can collectively muster. Together, we are ready to actively listen, rigorously self-examine and decisively act to reduce and ultimately eliminate systemic racism in our workplace practices, policies, program outcomes and service delivery.
We’re only done with page 3 of 16, although the last five pages are the glossary and annexes. If you’re curious what Canada’s Acting Deputy Minister of Immigration, Refugees, and Canadian Citizenship looks like, here she is.
Caroline Xavier
What struck me most about her little rant was the combination of anti-White buzzwords with corporate buzzwords. It’s so nice to see that the synergies which enable us, as we speak, to further enhance the Black and Indigenous ecosystem of social justice activism. Senior management has taken the lead and started building a consensus of likeminded anti-racism people of brownness who are focusing on our core competency’s of moving the needle on the systemic oppression of all the colours of Canada, except Whitey.
The ministerial mandate letters, including the letter addressed to the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada Mandate Letter (Prime Minister of Canada, December 2021), clearly articulate that the government’s priority is “to continue to address the profound systemic inequities and disparities that remain present in the core fabric of our society, including our core institutions,” and to this effect, “actively seek out and incorporate in [our] work, the diverse views of Canadians, [including] women, Indigenous Peoples, Black and racialized Canadians, newcomers, faith-based communities, persons with disabilities, LGBTQ2 Canadians, and in both official languages.” In this work the government is committed to “ensuring that public policies are informed and developed through an intersectional lens.”
Faith based communities, eh?
Funny, because I recall one particular faith based community having their religious sites burned to the ground without a single hate crime charge being levied. But just like these people say “diversity and inclusion for all,” when pushing policies that are designed to exclude White People, they say “faith based communities,” when they mean “yeah but fuck those Christians though.”
IRCC’s strategic Anti-Racism actions are at the forefront of Government of Canada initiatives to combat racism and discrimination in their various forms. The creation of the Anti-Racism Task Force in Summer 2020 has been pivotal to kick-starting coordinated Department-wide action. The Anti-Racism Value Statement (Annex A), publicly released in May 2021, acknowledges the impacts of our colonial legacy and historical racist policies that often work through the immigration system on Indigenous, Black and other racialized people. The openness to speak about racism has ushered in a series of Anti-Racism efforts at all levels of the Department, making our organization more inclusive with regard to people management, and improving the equity outcomes of policies, programs and service delivery practices (for a succinct overview of the Department’s Anti-Racism journey as of summer 2021, see its response to the Clerk of the Privy Council in the IRCC Letter on the Implementation of the Call to Action on Racism, Equity and Inclusion).
This is a great example of what I mean when I talk about corporate speak. It’s interesting seeing anti-White hate propaganda presented in conjunction with corporate double speak, but I suppose we should have predicted this.
The Department’s actions of self-examination and identifying accountabilities to support Anti-Racism work have catalyzed immediate action, demonstrating both the timeliness of the initiatives and the significant challenges ahead to advance on the path toward racial equity. IRCC’s first-ever Anti-Racism employee survey, conducted in fall 2020, provided a wealth of quantitative data regarding race-based discrimination experienced among different segments of our employees. The independent report, IRCC Anti-Racism Employee Focus Groups (PDF, 443 KB), prepared on behalf of the Department by Pollara Strategic Insights and published in June 2021, reveals key insights into the impact and nature of racism witnessed within the Department and the gaps in the current mechanisms to address discrimination.
More recently, in spring 2022, media attention directed at IRCC’s call centre in Montréal regarding an independent study of the work environment and various concerns raised by employees put the spotlight on how Anti-Racism initiatives can be brought to bear on employees’ day-to-day issues with the workload, nature of work, training, turnover and employment status. Regarding the policy and service delivery context, concerns raised over potential bias in the identification of special measures for refugees and displaced people (e.g. those fleeing war in Ukraine compared with refugees from Afghanistan, the Middle East and Africa) starkly reveal that the Department needs to be open-minded and self-critical in a more vigilant way—this, notwithstanding the significant advances made thus far in understanding the extent and nature of racism in our workplace, and in our policies, program design, service delivery and broader society.
It is pretty funny how even these people internally wanted Ukrainian refugees over Third Worlders.
Strategy 2.0 (2021–2024) (the Strategy) presents an increasingly integrated view of the Anti-Racism initiatives recently completed and currently under way. This iteration of our Strategy offers an overarching structure, that when viewed against the backdrop of the Government of Canada’s and IRCC’s Anti-Racism initiatives of the last few years, provides a refinement to our Anti-Racism work through a more focused and deliberate effort. Our intent is that this effort will build a model for systems change that includes concrete, actionable steps and a monitoring framework, which will generate increased momentum for the Department’s Anti-Racism work and lead to a sustainable culture shift.
Finally we’re done. I’m not going to even bother printing out the rest of this anti-White gibberish. Here’s a screencap from page 5.
Page 6 has some quotes from IRCC employees. They are unnamed, maybe because they’re fake, but the content speaks for itself.
“In my 32 years as a black woman in the public service, I have learned to navigate the unspoken barriers and ignore slights from those in a position of power. I have experienced their micro aggressions and their indifference. Those managers and directors have not changed their beliefs or their attitudes simply because IRCC created a new mandate. They are still in power and I am still Black.”
I’m bunching up the rest of the quotes all together. Sorry that the formatting got really weird.
“The thing required is to continue on the path that we have forged and not step back. This is a priority to change our thinking.”
“There has been a concerted effort from management and staff to achieve the objectives of the strategy, clearly there is a lot of buy-in at all levels of IRCC. There is dedicated people passionately challenging the status quo with courage.”
“I wish Anti-Racism topic was outdated and no longer necessary. I’m dreaming a bit but I hope one day we will not have to work harder to ensure equity and diversity.”
They then move on to their engagement with IRCC employees.
The unique perspectives of IRCC employees are the cornerstone of the Strategy. Employees’ insights, feedback, thoughts and concerns to address racism define the vision and the broad parameters of the Strategy. Quantitative and qualitative inputs include conversations and comments in meetings and presentations, data collected through live polls and online surveys. The engagement with employees and partners have included Let’s Talk Racism Town Halls, workshops on bias in policy development and service delivery, panels, Trust Circles,broad middle manager engagement with training and tools offered to navigate the Anti-Racism landscape, trauma coaching sessions with a subset of middle managers, working groups and committees set up within sectors, branches and regional offices. Engagement with diversity, equity and inclusion networks have included invitations to provide feedback from official Champions and chairs of Indigenous Peoples Circle (IPC),Persons with Disabilities Employee Network, Black Employees Network (BEN), Racialized Employees and Allies Network (REAN). The most detailed and comprehensive sources of quantitative data are the 2020 Public Service Employee Survey and the 2020 Anti-Racism Workforce Survey (first ever Anti-Racism survey at IRCC which had a response rate of almost 30 percent and whose analytical results were available to employees by spring 2021).
After they sent out some surveys to their own employees, and yes, this was their own employees, they move on in page 7 to the things their employees whined them into doing, although they already wanted to do them. I’m skipping over most of it, because it’s tedious stuff like:
Emphasize a multi-prong, agile and dedicated approach at all levels (top down, middle, bottom up) – do not expect AR work to be carried out through the corner of one’s desk or as a box ticking exercise.
Make the Strategy approachable, more like a conversation inviting and encouraging new ideas, a living document to which people will feel connected, touching their daily work experience.
Continue hammering AR commitments, dedicating resources to track progress and drive home the message that this issue is not just talk.
Start with smaller, concrete steps and be prepared to make mistakes over a long journey: Establish clear objectives, timelines, and how milestones will be achieved among other competing priorities.
But there is one part I do want to focus on.
Pay attention to multiple forms of racism, including Islamophobia, Anti-Semitism, racism within the same minority group and among minority groups.
In other words, they want all these Third Worlders to be here to destroy “White Supremacy,” by which they mean White People. However, some of those Third Worlders have these really uppity attitudes towards Gods Chosen Race, so they do actually need to stamp that out of them. The more anti-White they are the better, but if they’re complaining about jews genociding Palestinians, for example, that’s not really the kind of anti-racism that we’re looking for.
Pictured: Some migrants are, unfortunately, against this.
Page 8 includes this very important graph that they include.
Pay close attention to that bottom part. As a matter of fact, let me zoom in on that.
In other words, White People. Notice how there’s no target for the number of White employees? There probably is, but it’d be too bad optics to have that make its way into the general public. More than 70% of the Canadian population is White, and yet the Canadian federal government is bragging about our declining representation.
With that I’m skipping over the rest of this, and getting right to the glossary. You really need to click that and read it for yourself, but I’ve highlighted one section in particular that’s worth reading.
Hold on a second…
White Privilege
Benefitting from unearned power, advantages, access and/or opportunities based on being white or being perceived as white. White people are defined as belonging to any of the various peoples with light-coloured skin, usually of European origin. The term has become an indicator less of skin colour and more of an unquestioning acceptance of the legacies and ongoing practices of white supremacy and colonialism.
These people have a definition of White People that doesn’t require you to even be White.
With that I am done. That was a real slog, but this is your government folks. Bring over as many Third Worlders as possible, and privilege them constantly in employment and every other area, while taking seriously their hatred towards Israel. We are currently ruled over by a collection of extremely vicious clowns.
The good old fashioned RCMP. Or rather, the new militarized RCMP. Nice to see them doing everything they can to not abuse the illegitimate power they have over the peasants.
OTTAWA, Ont. — In a “remarkable” disclosure, Canada’s national police force has described for the first time how it uses spyware to infiltrate mobile devices and collect data, including by remotely turning on the camera and microphone of a suspect’s phone or laptop.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police says it only uses such tools in the most serious cases, when less intrusive techniques are unsuccessful. But until now, the force has not been open about its ability to employ malware to hack phones and other devices, despite usingthe tools for several years. Between 2018 and 2020, the RCMP said it deployed this technology in 10 investigations.
“This is a remarkable finding and, for the first time, publicly reveals that the RCMP is using spyware to infiltrate mobile devices, as well as the broad capabilities of their spyware,” he said.
As if there wasn’t enough of a reason to hate the RCMP, now we have this. I love how the RCMP say that they only use this in limited situations. Except that the limited situations aren’t when dealing with drug cartels or anything, it’s just when they can’t get the information they want with other means. So basically, they only don’t do this when they feel they don’t need to.
The RCMP says the increasing use of encrypted communication means police need new tools to keep up. But critics say the advent of the digital era means police have access to vastly more information than ever before. They say there needs to be a public discussion about what limits to place on the use of malware and other intrusive tools.
The team, which exists to intercept communication that can’t be obtained using traditional wiretaps, uses “on-device investigative tools.” The RCMP defines those as computer programs “installed on a targeted computing device that enables the collection of electronic evidence” — spyware, in other words.
The RCMP can use spyware to collect a broad range of data, including text messages, email, photos, videos, audio files, calendar entries and financial records. The police can also gather “audio recordings of private communications and other sounds within range of the targeted device” and “photographic images of persons, places and activities viewable by the camera(s) built into the targeted device,” the document says.
These tools are only used during serious criminal and national security investigations, the force says, and always require authorization from a judge. The RCMP declined an interview request and did not provide answers to written questions before this article was published.
Of course they don’t provide any examples of the judges refusing authorization for their spyware installations. How exactly they get this on the target devices is unclear to me, and I doubt they can simply snap their fingers and get this on there. In fact they say as much later on in the piece.
This isn’t the first time the RCMP has raised concerns about encryption. In 2016, the same year the CAIT program was launched, the police force gave reporters from the CBC and the Toronto Star an inside look at 10 active investigations it said were being stymied by the use of encryption. The move came as the government was pitching four proposals to enhance police capabilities, including a law that would compel suspects to unlock digital devices at the request of police with a judge’s warrant.
So no, they can’t snap their fingers and install their spyware. However, they can certainly try to spy on you as best they can without any recourse from their victims. And make no mistake, the judges are not going to be the slightest impediment to their spyware program.
“We haven’t had a public debate over the adoption of these tools, while they’re clearly being used by at least the RCMP and potentially other policing forces in Canada,” said Tamir Israel, staff lawyer at the University of Ottawa’s Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic. “It’s really, really concerning that this type of intrusive tool is already in use, and we haven’t had that debate.”
Israel disputed the idea that police are at a disadvantage due to encryption. Thanks to our growing digital footprints, he said, law enforcement has seen a “massive increase” in their ability to monitor people. “That’s more than counterbalanced any potential drop-off there has been over these new types of communication tools,” he said. “Overall, they have a much more robust picture of what we’re doing [and] who we’re doing it with … than was the case historically.”
Israel believes Canada needs a legal framework that sets out which spyware tools can be used for policing and in what context.
Everybody thank Israel for standing up for the goyim’s right not to be spied on. Or in this case, inserting himself in the way so as to capture the natural outrage that this spy program will undoubtedly engender and make sure it’s kosher and impotent.
In the document, the RCMP says it didn’t consult the federal privacy commissioner before launching the CAIT program in 2016.
A spokesperson for privacy commissioner Philippe Dufresne confirmed to POLITICO that his office has not been notified about the CAIT program, and said the office will be following up with the RCMP. Government institutions are required to notify the privacy commissioner of “initiatives that may have an impact on the privacy of Canadians,” the spokesperson said in an email.
So it’s also a secret program, that the RCMP broke the law by not reporting to the privacy commissioner. Meaning this was too bad for even Trudeau’s privacy commissioner to know about.
Last year, a collaborative investigation called the Pegasus Project revealed that spyware licensed by Israeli firm NSO Group to governments for tracking criminals was also used to hack smartphones belonging to journalists and human rights activists.
Weird, because just a few paragraphs ago we saw Mr. Israel pretending to lead the charge against RCMP spying. Then it turns out that Country Israel is leading the charge in terms of the spying itself. Funny how that works.
In all honesty, this is just yet another black mark against the RCMP. I’m not getting too worked up about it, in part because I think it might be at least partly a scare tactic. They can’t just randomly force your phone to download spyware, at least for now, and the same is true for your laptop.
That they have the arrogance to try doing this garbage in secret is bad enough, but it doesn’t really fundamentally change the RCMP. They’re still a militarized police force. They’re still a political police force. And we still have nothing to hide from these creeps.
Organizers of a family-friendly drag show at a Victoria café have cancelled the event after the café owner says staff were inundated with homophobic and transphobic phone calls.
The monthly Sashay Café drag show was scheduled to go ahead this Saturday at Caffe Fantastico.
Café owner Ryan Taylor said staff received many hateful calls, but one call on Tuesday turned especially aggressive when the caller threatened to “shoot up the place and everyone in it.”
Family Friendly drag show eh? That reminds me of something.
What evidence is there that this was a truly family friendly show? Well the CBC and the perverts organizing it said so, bigot.
Taylor said staff had been logging calls, which he said expressed homophobic sentiments and mischaracterized the event as “trying to groom children to be gay.”
Can you believe these bigots believe that children are going to be getting groomed by boy hungry pedophiles at the family friends child grooming show? What a reedonkulous notion. That would never happen.
The rest of the article is just them whining about being victims. No real evidence is given of anyone being seriously threatened. It’s possible that these creeps got spooked by some threats, but it’s possible that they’re just playing the victim, as always. I can’t say for sure either way.
And just when I was about to fully support them they go ahead and do something spiritually ghey like the following.
