Categories
Canada Military

A. Nonymous on the CAF and its “Retention Problem” – Part 3: Neverending Globo Homo

I’ve been a bit behind in my installments of A. Nonymous’ excellent expose on the Canadian Armed Forces self-made “retention problem.” This is the next part, a continuation of his Intro, and the next parts will be scheduled one day after another until we get through this. I will also note that the quotation indent block will actually be me applying my comments to his work, which will be non-indented.


CFB Edmonton pride parade 2022
(Source: CFB Edmonton Pride Parade Op Order)

The gays just want to get married, bigot. What they do in the privacy of their own home is none of your business.

-Someone, somewhere, a long time ago, in a galaxy not that far away

Ah, 2004! What a good year it was. Windows XP was changing the face of the personal computer, and Half-Life 2 had just debuted. The SUV and the McMansion were still iconic, and the drunken feel-good of the 90s had not yet become a hangover. The gays were allowed to get married in several Canadian provinces, and were a year away from federal recognition. Finally, they would get what they wanted, then join society as equals, and everyone would live happily ever after…

But that was 18 years ago. Has such a future come to fruition?

Well, I wouldn’t continue writing if it had; Please refer to the above image.

It turns out that the legal recognition of gay marriage wasn’t enough for them. No, sir. They require businesses to bake gay cakes for them, against the faith of the owners. They need taxpayer subsidized gay parades in every major city, to showcase how proud they are of being gay. They need gay representation in businesses, and they need businesses to have gay flags and rainbow logos for gay month (June). Gay month? Not enough. They need gay season, which now exists all summer long in Canada. Apparently, they also need gay advisory boards for each CAF base, who subsequently advise the base to raise gay flags, and order soldiers to participate in gay events:

“3 CDSB Edmonton will conduct a Pride Week Road Move Parade on 24 JUN 22 in order to promote a culture of inclusivity and diversity, and offer support and representation to the LGBTQ2+ community within the CAF.”

Offer representation? Don’t these people represent themselves by virtue of existing? Are they not represented by the gay flags that have flown on CAF bases for nearly a decade already? What about the gay parades done by municipalities? Is there no end to this madness?

Think back to our imaginary corporal. He grew up in the mid 2000s, and learned that gays just want to be left alone. But now he has been ordered to participate in a gay event as a military member. Why can’t the gays just leave him alone? Why can’t the gays just work and march and obey orders like everyone else? Why do they need to force everyone else to bear witness to their gayness? Perhaps the good corporal is a member of a faith which does not support the gays; Orthodox Christianity for example. He can’t participate in such an event in accordance with his faith; What will happen to him if he brings this objection to his chain of command? Ostracism, likely. Maybe charges for hate speech or something? Maybe they’ll leave him alone, but keep a watchful eye on him forever more. The fact that he can’t trust the CAF to respect his faith is abominable. The gays can make him participate, but imagine if the Orthodox Church members in the CAF demanded that gays participate in worship? Maybe Islam is a better thought experiment, since it is higher on the chart of diversity. This is the main effort from the Op order, which is not the same as a mission statement:

“The main effort is the Road Move which will provide a visible representation of support for the CAF’s LGBTQ2+ community, and the values of inclusion, diversity, and acceptance”

OK, what about inclusion, diversity, and acceptance of faiths or individuals which object to homosexuality? This is a reoccurring theme, in case you haven’t noticed: diversity except for certain things, inclusion except for certain things, acceptance except for certain things, double standards for all things.

I should stress that the bold is mine. A. Nonymous makes a point that bears repeating. These people are just anti-White perverts, and it’s all “no borders, no nations, except Israel,” and “no racial discrimination, except against Whitey.” There’s always a double standard with these people.

Behold, a partial screen shot of the Op Order! Drag performances? I’m not an expert, but I don’t think that veterans of the last world war would be entirely supportive of this; That the same military they fought a bloody war in would, ~80 years later, conduct drag performances for all to see. In fact, I think they might have got back on the boats and returned home, but then again, at least we aren’t speaking German or whatever…

There is something that I want you to keep in mind here: the CAF is supposed to be a politically neutral organization. Their mandate is to serve the sitting government, while being completely detached from any specific political party, or any organization that can be perceived as politically charged. The good corporal, for example, is not allowed to publicly support a political candidate in any capacity, because it would violate the entire organization’s duty to remain politically neutral. Why, then, is the CAF itself participating in gay events, something which have become inherently political? Double standards, again.

Redefining Chaplaincy

(Source: The Minister of National Defence Advisory Panel on Systemic Racism and Discrimination)

(Try saying that all in one breath)

For the unaware, chaplains are military members who work in the role of a faith leader, while also performing other related duties in the field of welfare. Their uniforms are much the same as other CAF members, with the exception of an additional accoutrement indicating their faith, with the most commonly seen one being a crucifix representing a variety of Christian denominations. Not all militaries have chaplains embedded as uniformed members like the CAF, but it is and has been common for military focused faith leaders to attend the spiritual requirements of soldiers across the globe, with forced-secular places like the former USSR being noteworthy exceptions. Chaplaincy has a long history in Canada, and one can find them working even within places like a brigade headquarters, advising the commander on matters of troop welfare, performing services, and even discussing the religious
implications of a region for military purposes. Though the religiosity of the CAF has waned along with the rest of Canadian society (the cult of Covid notwithstanding) one still finds many members who seek their assistance in both religious matters and non-religious matters, and there is an expectation that soldiers can rely on them to provide denomination specific things such as sacraments, up to and including the Last Rites in Christianity, and parallel constructs in other faiths. The CAF itself states the following of chaplains:

“[They are] responsible for fostering the spiritual, religious, and pastoral care of Canadian Armed Forces members and their families, regardless of religious affiliation, practice, and/or belief. They have an open attitude and promote diversity within the Canadian Armed Forces by providing an environment that is caring and compassionate.”

Diversity has returned yet again. I suppose that if I were to search for the role of a diesel generator in the CAF, it would also be partially responsible for promoting diversity and inclusion. Here’s the problem, not all faiths are congruent with this definition. Islam, the favourite of the current regime, is very intolerant of the LGBTABCD crowd, as it is also with women. In fact, the Islamic debate on sodomy generally starts on the roof and ends on the ground. Orthodox Christianity is likewise sternly unsupportive of sodomy, though not with a violent twist. Roman Catholicism is supposed to be as well, but the pope is working diligently to sell his people down the river in that regard so we’ll need to wait and see.

Of course, the authors of the source document are fully aware of this, and are probably working tirelessly to delete from the chaplaincy any faith that doesn’t meet their diversity requirements:

“Another important point is that, at present, some chaplains represent or are affiliated with organized religions whose beliefs are not synonymous with those of a diverse and inclusive workplace. Some of the affiliated religions of these chaplains do not subscribe to an open attitude and the promotion of diversity.”

What are Catholics or Orthodox or Muslim members to do? Can they expect a chaplain to service their religious needs in the future? Not if the CAF gets their way. Presumably, they will be attended to by someone who means well enough, but whose religious affiliation is not in accordance with their requirements. The non-religious may not care, but this is an egregious violation of the principle of freedom of religion.

In case there were any doubt that this is specifically targeting non-reform Christianity, bear witness to this paragraph:

“It is necessary as well to recognize that, for some Canadians, religion can be a source of suffering and generational trauma. This is especially true for many lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and twospirited members of Canadian society. And Indigenous Peoples have suffered unimaginable generational trauma and genocide at the hands of Christian religious leaders through initiatives such as Residential School and Indian Day School programs.”

Christianity bad! Christians are apparently expected to bear the shame of evil actions from other Christians, yet other faiths are obviously not. Imagine the uproar if Ukrainians claimed intergenerational trauma from Jewish Bolsheviks murdering and starving millions of their brethren in the 1930s. Every Jew from here to Tel Aviv would be kvetching about antisemitism until the planet were deaf, while furiously trying to blame it on Germans. What about the Balkan Slavs causing a ruckus over the centuries-long Ottoman (Islamic) occupation of their lands, complete with rape and slavery? The Turks would say they deserved it for being infidels, while simultaneously claiming it didn’t happen. But Christians can’t get away with that, at least not any Christian who even remotely follows the doctrine of the Bible.

“If the Defence Team rejects gender discrimination, anti-Indigenous discrimination, and racialized discrimination in every other area and is working hard to remove systemic barriers to the employment of marginalized people, it cannot justify hiring representatives of organizations who marginalize certain people or categorically refuse them a position of leadership.”

Aside from the fact that, actually, the Defence team openly endorses gender and racial discrimination, it is another double standard to pretend to avoid those things while discriminating by faith. Obviously their first goal is to purge the CAF of any Christian chaplains who don’t bend the knee to sodomy, but those who are looking ahead will find that this sets the stage for a purge of any members who declare themselves followers of said faiths. It is unlikely that they will be fired explicitly, as the CAF prefers to metaphorically kick its unliked members in the balls until they ‘voluntarily’ leave, then ask why everyone is leaving.

Redefining the CAF Dress Regulations

(Source: Canadian Federal Government)

A military uniform is supposed to be mostly consistent, with differences being for functional purposes like the indication of rank, recognition of medals, and denoting a person’s unit. The term uniform itself come from latin uni (one) and formis (form or style). The point of a uniform was to make everyone as similar as reasonably possible, outside of those functional differences, the idea being that when you wear it you now become equal to your comrades. The same principle of course applies to schools and workplaces that use them. Standards have always accompanied the porting of a uniform, such as an acceptable hair length, ironing of shirts, polishing of boots, and in many militaries, the shaving of facial hair. These standards, as well as the uniform, also serve as disciplinary thresholds outside of their primary purpose of uniformity. In the CAF, there have also traditionally been restrictions on things like tattoos, earrings, and personal sunglasses; How well would it reflect on the CAF if Cpl Smith had a tattoo on his face or lavish diamond earrings dangling from his ears? That would be ludicrous.

Fortunately, all of that archaic nonsense about uniformity and discipline will imminently be phased out, as the CAF has released their plan for an update to the dress regulations. Here is a snippet from the source on why they are changing it for the first time in 50 years:

“The appearance of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) has not kept pace with the Canadian society which it serves.”

The society which the CAF serves has become slovenly, stupid, lazy, diseased, degenerate, brainwashed, unmotivated, and rotten to the core. Should the CAF therefore mimic these fine qualities?

Before diving in to the changes, we should first be familiar with some exceptions to the dress regulations which have already happened. Firstly, a notable exception was made some decades ago regarding male Sikh members of the CAF, who are obligated by religious doctrine to port a turban and
remain unshaven, thus deviating from the uniform standard. Secondly, beards had been authorized for certain members for either medical, occupational, or religious reasons (such as but not limited to above) for some time, and had actually been granted for all CAF members only a couple years ago if they so choose. Thirdly, long hair for men has been allowed for some time for religious or cultural reasons, such as but not limited to native members of the CAF. While these exceptions (not an exhaustive list!), especially the authorizations for Sikh members, were controversial, there was some reasonable justification provided for each one, even if one thinks the decision was ultimately wrong: At least the CAF tried to back up their decisions in these cases with reasonable effort. More importantly, these concessions were not egregious violations of the principal of uniform, and expectations for things like beards and long hair were that they are well kept and orderly. As far as turbans go, there is a matching colour scheme for a turban such that it matches the colours used by the corresponding normal headdress that other members wear. Again, many still disagree with these concessions, but you can’t say they didn’t try. The following alterations, on the other hand…

What wonderful changes have they made for the CAF this time? Let’s dig in:

“DEUs are no longer gender based. Both catalogues are open to all members and they may be intermixed. CAF members may choose their uniform design, which must fit them properly/professionally, as per the Dress Instructions. Some restrictions may be imposed in certain circumstances such as on parade.”

I’m not even certain if I should explain this one, as it should be self evident that this is hilariously wrong. However, it makes sense given that Canada is a country which believes men can be women, women can be men, and anyone who questions such mental illness is a thought criminal. In case you don’t understand the above paragraph, it means that men can wear skirts and pretend to be women, or that women can pretend to be men. Given that it is illegal to even look twice at these people, what sort of effect will it have on unit cohesion if Johnny decides to be Jane and wear skirts to work? Everyone will be terrified of getting locked up for wrongthink, and Johnny is now a walking threat. I’m sure that such a policy will really improve work ethic and retention!

The following text has been removed: “Behaviour such as chewing gum, slouching, placing hands in pockets, smoking or eating on the street and walking hand in hand, is forbidden.” Does that mean CAF members can now do all those things when in uniform?

Pursuant to QR&O 17.02, the deportment and appearance of all ranks, in uniform or when wearing civilian attire, shall on all occasions reflect credit on the CAF and the individual. It is the responsibility and duty of all CAF members to ensure that, while in uniform, they comport themselves in a manner which projects a positive military appearance. Leaders at all levels have a role to play in this regard.”

More weasel words, I see. If that line has been removed, then the behaviour is implicitly or explicitly allowed. It says that leaders at all levels have a role to play, but they don’t have the support of a document to back them up anymore. If Maj So-and-so sees two soldiers doing these obviously inappropriate behaviours in uniform, he can’t do anything about it. If he tried to punish them, it would be thrown back in his face since the documentation no longer prohibits it. What would others think of our military if they saw soldiers doing these activities in public?

“Is unnatural-coloured hair acceptable in ceremonial orders of dress? And must accessories match the colour of hair?

Yes, the colouring of hair is permitted in all orders of dress unless it inhibits an operational duty. For example, bright coloured hair may have a negative operational impact during field operations or training. Leaders are invited to discuss with their members to find a simple, suitable accommodation, such as a scarf to cover the hair. Accessories do not have to match the colour of the member’s hair. However, all accessories shall meet safety and operational requirements and not must not discredit the CAF.”

Great, now the CAF is allowing rainbow haired creatures. This paragraph implies that members can dye their hair any colour they want unless it interferes with field operations. Green and purple haired peacocks violate the principle of uniformity in the same manner as one who wears a pink jacket instead of their issued pieces of uniform. Furthermore, such an action reflects discredit on the CAF by showing a blatant disregard for operational readiness: Certainly, most of the CAF isn’t going to deploy tomorrow to fight, but the principle of operational readiness is that they should be as prepared as possible to do so if required. It is for the same reason that CAF members are expected to maintain their physical fitness. What if Cpl Freakshow were to deploy tomorrow to fight somewhere? As mentioned above, they can choose to cover their hair with a scarf or something, but is that not an additional and unnecessary burden on their ability to remain camouflaged? Should they smear their hair with mud so the enemies don’t immediately see them? Shave it off completely?

Coming to a military base near you.

Having pink haired antifa mutants in slovenly uniform serves to get the message across that this is a Globo Homo force that fights for International Finance Capital. It’s not just that the Military has all these general losers, this is a deliberate point by them to mark their territory, in my opinion.

The Russians must be quaking in their boots, but from laughter rather than fear. As if these aren’t bad enough, they intend to review it periodically and will likely make more changes:

“Going forward, the intention is to continually review the updated Dress Instructions, in order to provide additional clarity where necessary and to include any elements previously overlooked.”

Why maintain cohesion and retention when you can shill for inclusion instead? Of course, the sort of people the CAF needs are precisely the ones who will be turned off by these concessions, and will likely refrain from signing up, or consider releasing if they are already in.

C. A note about White supremacy

Where is all this White supremacy that they are complaining about so much? If we look at their definition of White supremacy, as per the source for the chaplaincy section, we find the following:

“The term “white supremacy” is often misunderstood. For this report, the following definition is used: white supremacy “is the idea (ideology) that white people and the ideas, thoughts, beliefs and actions of white people are superior to People of Colour and their ideas, thoughts, beliefs, and actions. White supremacy expresses itself interpersonally as well as structurally (through our governments, education systems, food systems, etc.).” A white supremacist is “a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and white people should have control over people of different races.”

Interesting. I have not met a single military person who meets both categories, though there must be at least a few somewhere. There are some that I have met who might believe Whites are superior (it’s hard to tell without explicit comment), but I would be hard pressed to find someone who really thinks Whites should rule others. But what would we call someone who thinks that Whites are inferior to others, and that Whites should be ruled by others? Because there are magnitudes more of them than there are alleged White supremacists, including the regime itself since such an attitude is explicitly permitted. Obviously, the CAF couldn’t care less, as they wouldn’t have any standards if not for double standards.

Unfortunately, the CAF (and its parent regime) will get precisely what it wants in this witch hunt, as it is actively creating White supremacists and ardent White racists (and those of other races too!) through their continued efforts to divide everyone along racial lines, give preferential treatment to certain groups, and promote racial conflict. Whites who just wanted to live peacefully with others are becoming quickly aware that such a future was never going to happen, and situations like these may transform those individuals into the most adamant racists you could imagine. Hitler’s NSDAP and Mao’s communist party did not appear spontaneously. Romanians didn’t execute Ceaușescu because it was a fun thing to do on a Monday. The US civil rights movement didn’t happen because Blacks just happened to collectively feel like it. These situations were the products of years of perceived injustice, and the CAF would do well to take note. A better example might even be the Vietcong during the Vietnam war, who found otherwise disinterested farmers joining their ranks after getting picked on by American forces for no reason other than their race. While the CAF would like to [pretend to] solve the unsolvable retention problem, their propaganda may generate a far more insidious problem of a similar nature. All they had to do was leave people alone, but that was a bridge too far. Obviously, this nonsense comes directly from the feds, who likely have a variety of nefarious reasons for it, none of which will benefit the people or the CAF regardless of their skin colour.

For those interested, here is a good interview on the subject of the Vietnamese, which is quite relatable in a few ways to the topic of this paper. It is approximately 15 minutes in length.


As is often the case, I don’t have that much to add to this paper, since it is itself commentary from someone with fairly decent if imperfect politics. The next piece will be his section on “Faith in the Chain of Command,” and will be scheduled for tomorrow morning.

Categories
Canada Military Police

The Canadian Military is a Complete and Utter Joke, But the RCMP is the Real Military, Part 2

In my previous post on this subject, I went over what a complete and utter joke the Canadian Military is. For $22 Billion per year, you don’t even get a functional infantry. That money simply goes into the ether, never to be seen again.

Notice all the anechoic tiles falling off.

Well not quite, some of it goes into the crucially important White Fragility training.

This was funded by your taxes through the military.

But at the end of that piece I showed some pictures of the RCMP. Here, take another look at them.

This is all from the Trucker Protest in Ottawa from February of this past year.

Yes, that’s the RCMP. They didn’t call in the military. And no, they didn’t have to borrow any of the gear they’re wearing from the military, from the camoflage to the rifles.

It was news to me, quite the shock really, to see that the police were even allowed to carry around rifles, let alone already having them as standard. But as my ex-military buddy explained to me, they call them “patrol carbines,” and the conservatives let them have them, because of course they did.

Blue Line:

The RCMP has been quietly rolling out its new patrol carbine program, training instructors and preparing to issue the new kit to officers.

There was a lot of speculation about the rifle and its capabilities when the program was first announced in 2011, including thread after thread on the

We can finally –

It’s rare to see an article this sloppily written, but Blue Line just accidentally didn’t finish the sentence here. Nevertheless, they’ve given us the information that we need. This program was started in 2011, under the Conservative Party of Canada. Remember that when these faggots pretend to be libertarians in order to not give you the policy you deserve.

We can finally offer some much needed information about the new patrol carbine – it is real, and it is spectacular.

I believe them when they say that. To quote from that conversation again.

Him: The average police officer is 1000x more capable. And better funded. I’m pretty sure Victoria Police Service or their RCMP branch is better funded than their reserve regiments, which if I remember correctly, are almost NES (non-effective strength)

When I was in, the cops would sometimes drop in to train with us, and they had way better gats. Like their rifles were actually designed to do work. Ours were the outcome of some procurement schemes.

Me: Since when did the police get rifles anyway?

Him: They have PaTrOL CaRbiNeS….. Almost all of them have a Colt Canada C8, tuned up, in their vehicle.

Me: Patrol Cabines? Are you kidding me? Like we’re supposed to believe they’re just out there doing clean sweeps of the woods or something? 

Amazing how these faggots are the biggest gun control activists out there but they’ve got this going on.

Him: Look it up, bro. It will fucking make you puke

Here is the C8 rifle.

In the above picture it’s being held by a Canadian Special Operations Regiment soldier, or at least that’s what’s claimed by the uploader of the image. Someone who knows what the patch on his shoulder or markings on his helmet mean could probably confirm. 

The LE Patrol Rifle featured in our cover story on Colt Canada is similar to the one the RCMP chose. It is a semi-auto, 15.7-inch-barreled version of the Colt Canada LE Patrol IUR, complete with the solid one-piece, integrated upper receiver and full-floating, cold hammer forged barrel.

Rumour has it that it will be equipped with the combat-proven Aimpoint red dot sight, Troy folding backup sights, Vickers combat sling, quick detachable light and the same silky smooth, two-stage trigger upgrade used by many US special forces.

And according to Military Today:

The C8 can be seen as a compact version of the C7 for the troops that do not need a full-size assault rifle, such as vehicle drivers, artillery crews, airborne troops and special operation units. The C8 carbine was adopted in 1994. Currently it is used by the Canadian armed forces.

You can add Royal Canadian Mounted Police to the list of operators. I included the above just to make sure that everyone understands that this isn’t some sort of subsonic rubber bullet shooter. This is an infantry weapon, and in fact, the police version has an even longer barrel.

C8CT (Custom Tactical) is a designated marksman version of the C8 carbine. It seems that is was primarily developed for a law enforcement use as a sniper spotter weapon. It is a more accurate weapon than the baseline C8. It is fitted with a 410 mm (16″) barrel, match trigger, weightier stock, small removable bipod, accessory rail for designators under the foregrip, different pistol grip, and has some other differences. It is usually used with sound suppressor.

The typical barrel length is 368mm. They lengthened it by about two inches for the blue antifa, so it could be even better at killing people, at the expense of being more unwieldy to cart around. I’m going to repeat that because I think it’s important. The RCMP deliberately demanded a custom version of this military rifle that was more of a pain in the ass to cart around, but had a higher muzzle velocity so it was better at killing Canadians.

Back to the Blue Line article.

The RCMP didn’t just step up to the plate with this rifle; it knocked it out of the park.

They certainly went all in with your taxdollars didn’t they? Man, they certainly will spare no expense when it’s you paying. It may have cost a lot of your money, but that’s a sacrifice that they are willing to make.

But it’s not even the rifles themselves, as my colleague pointed out. Let’s take another look at those pictures.

Him: Couple images loading for you.

Each officer is wearing a uniform that cost roughly 800 CAD.

Their plate carrier is either a TYR or LOF Defence…. And was anywhere from 700 to 1,200….. Each appear to have special laser aiming devices for use with Night Vision. So we can guess that they have at least 28K on their guns and on their heads.

They’re also likely running some kind of ceramic armour plate, which would be anywhere from 800 per plate to 4k

Twenty eight thousand dollars for these cunts. Twenty eight thousand for all of the gear that they’re wearing. Twenty eight thousand dollars for the gun control activists in blue. Or in this case, the gun control activists in brown desert camo to be used in an urban environment.

Him: Coyote brown paint…..
On a police rifle…. used in an urban environment.
Very larpy, if you ask me.
Well no doubt. The RCMP is a military. They’re probably the world’s shittiest military, and if these LARPy faggots started actually dying in some sort of civil war their morale would be immediately shot. But just because they’re a shitty military, does not mean that they aren’t a real one.

It’s sort of like how Antifa is a terrorist organization. They’re the world’s shittiest and most laughable terrorist organization, filled to the brim with social rejects.But just because entry into that terrorist organization requires a couple extra chromosomes, a meth addiction, and schizophrenia doesn’t disqualify it as a terrorist organization.

But my question to the audience is, did you know that the police are allowed to have infantry rifles in their cars as they go out and about in the world? And not just allowed, encouraged to have these expensive rifles, along with other expensive infantry gear? Did you know that?

Keep all this in mind when you see this political police force acting politically. They are a military unto themselves. And also keep this in mind whenever you hear some “leftist,” LARPing like they’re fighting against the cops. They’ll never mention these gun control activists in blue being better armed than our infantry, because the point of the Jagmeet Singh’s of the world is to get out in front of normal people’s natural hatred for the Blue Antifa, and turn it super anti-White and perverted. Or, at the very least, make absolutely damn sure that it goes nowhere.

All “attacks,” on the police from the donor-left are simply good optics racial attacks on White People. They’re fine with the police. They love the police. And they love that they are a military unto themselves, with PaTRoL CArBinEs in their cars that have been modified to be better at killing the peasants, even at the expense of being harder to carry around.

They love that, they’re big fans. Which is also why, when some uppity truckers went to the capitol, these people were going full bootstomping on them and whining that the police aren’t doing enough to oppress them.

And also keep this in mind when some conservative shill like Pierre Poilievre starts bloviating about “making Canada the freest country in the world,” or whatever trite garbage his owners make him say. His owners want a militarized police armed to the teeth, and you to be completely disarmed so that you’re helpless against them and easily oppressed. 

Which is why you can’t find any anti-gun control policies on his website. But you can find him LARPing like he’s going to do something to Iran.

Categories
International

Even WMD Liars Call Trudeau’s Staged “Rebuke” of Putin “Theatrical”

CTV:

ADAZI, LATVIA — Justin Trudeau joined NATO allies Tuesday in staging a theatrical rebuke of Russia’s war on Ukraine from a heavily armoured war-games field and in a floodlit news conference from one of the alliance’s eastern European bases.

Check out this snapshot I got of the Canadian Military troops that got sent to this theatrical production. What a bunch of goofballs. Jesus. Half of them are woman, and they aren’t even in shape.

The prime minister promised Baltic leaders on a whirlwind trip to Latvia that Canada will stand with them to fight Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine and its cyberattacks on their countries.

Trudeau and NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg made clear that NATO’s purpose is defensive, but that the core NATO agreement — that an attack on one member is an attack on them all — is very much in play.

“We are here to protect every inch of allied territory, of Latvia and all other NATO countries,” Stoltenberg said at a joint news conference on the ─Çdazi military base northeast of Riga, Latvia.

Right. Which is why you’re making retarded theatrical productions, that even your own propagandists refer to as “theatrical.” I honestly don’t know what’s more irritating with these people, the overall goal of supporting (((Zelensky))), or the complete and utter group-delusions they undergo about themselves. Like, even if I supported the Zelensky Regime in Ukraine, I would still be really irritated by Ghost of Kiev retarded propaganda. This is because I live in the world of reality, and these people simply do not.

Trudeau said Russian President Vladimir Putin made a mistake thinking Ukraine and NATO were weak and divided.

“He’s been shown how wrong he is,” Trudeau said. “Ukrainians are strong and courageous and standing up to defend their land. And NATO has never been more united and determined than we are now. I know I can speak for all NATO members when I say we will all abide by Article Five.”

I’m not even sure why we need to be here. By Trudeau’s own standards, Ukraine is winning, hard.

Sanchez, echoing earlier remarks by Anand, tore a page from the Canadian feminist foreign policy play book and paid tribute to International Women’s Day.

“Eight March should have been a day of celebration of women and girls in Ukraine,” Sanchez said, adding that Putin’s “brutal aggression is forcing them to flee their country or fight for their lives.”

Yeah I mean… along with all the men, right? But there you have it, the Feminist Foreign Policy of Canada supports Putin Baaaad Man right alonside George Soros.

Never forget that Ukraine, as we saw with the Hunter Biden story and others, is a hive for international corruption and criminal profiteering, which is a big part of the reason, maybe even most of the reason why these privileged little cunts and cuntesses are so assmad about Putin. It’s certainly not for the lives of Ukrainians themselves, or they wouldn’t support the Ukrainian government blocking Ukrainian civilians from leaving Ukraine. Which, by the way, is a war crime.

Categories
Anti-White Canada Military

Canadian Military’s White Fragility AMA, Part 6, the Q&A

You may remember all the way from the beginning of this series, that these people were self-congratulating themselves on the “courageous,” discussion they were going to be having by attacking White People. Well, considering that this was an Ask Me Anything, and these people are super courageous, some might even say stunning and brave, you’d think that they’d actually, you know, let us ask them some questions.

Well needless to say, that didn’t happen. When we last left off in our series we had finally reached the end of Ryan Trudeau’s “my wife’s black son taught me the meaning of friendship and courage through spiderman,” story. With that he opened it up to questions. And by opened it up to questions, I mean they had a “moderated chat,” which had been collecting questions the entire time and discarding every single one of ours.

Samantha Moonsammy

At this point Samantha Moonsammy took over the mic again and started reading out the questions. Keep in mind that none of our questions made it through moderation at the Ask Me Anything. Instead we get questions like this.

So I want Ryan and Rob to focus on it from this perspective. What negative experiences has your White Privilege protected you from throughout your life. And then on the flipside Faduno not having that privilege share with us what that means.

The answers are precisely what you’d expect. I’m not going to bother reading out these questions or answers, because it’s another 35 minutes of this. Instead I’ll show the questions that we asked, which never got answers. There were four of us in there. Myself, Scott Summers, Tyranosphobic Rekt, and Jim Northpoint, all under different names of course. I was “Rachel Leibowitz.” 

But before I do that I’d just like to state once again that this was an “Ask me Anything.” A “courageous conversation,” on White Fragility. Once again, keep this in mind when you read our questions, literally none of which made it through moderation.

Look I’m not going to pretend that I didn’t have any fun writing these questions. Even still, you can see why they absolutely refused to answer any of my questions. That second one in particular. I mean it is this assumed premise that his mulatto child is entitled to these, quite frankly, racist and discriminatory preferences. 

Two of the questions I asked I didn’t get screencaps of, but they were in a similar vein. Below we have screencaps from Jim Northpoint and his questions. The ones labeled (You) are his.

He also asked far more questions than we have screencaps for. And it’s good that they are asked in a completely different style, because it shows how utterly fraudulent the “Ask Me Anything,” was. Ask Me The Questions I’m Comfortable Answering: A cucky and pathetic display of anti-White hate propaganda, is what it should have been called.

Here’s one of the questions asked by TR. Since he didn’t screencap it, and the Microsoft Teams conversation closed, all we have is the questions that we pre-posted in Telegram.

We counted over 20 questions asked by us all combined. Literally none of them were answered. Jim Northpoint even had one of his questions get 9 likes, before “mysteriously,” being removed from the public chat. I wonder how that happened?

There you have it. Your Canadian Military bureaucracy goyim. Spouting anti-White hate propaganda and censoring the public in their Courageous Ask Me Anything.

Categories
Anti-White Canada

Canadian Military’s White Fragility Ask Me Anything – Part 4, The Suspected Cuckold Enthusiast Begins Speaking

It’s been too long since I worked on this series. In part 1 I showed the intro, which provides a lot of context. Then we got to the anti-White Samantha Moonsammy explaining her “layers” and alternating between being anti-White and dropping buzzword after buzzword. We pick up just as Faduno Ali passing the baton off to Rob Chambers, an Assistant Deputy Minister with the Department of Defense in Canada.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9NfZ6I9tzA

Before I start I have to give a big thanks to Samantha and to Fiduno and to your teams for all the work that you to in this uh, in this space. You know the committment, the courage, the endurance uh that it takes to do what you do is… is very very humbling. You’re certainly leading by example so uh thank you very very much for that very much appreciate that.

That’s it. I have decided that these people will literally explode if they do not call themselves courageous at least once every five minutes.

Anyway, he bloviates about thanking everyone. Ryan Trudeau, the audience, ADME employees. Everyone on the planet is having a courageous conversation that needs to happen. And by everyone we mean like 50 people on a livestream. They didn’t include the nubmers, if you’re curious.

So we live and work in communities all over the country. We have cultures that match those communities. Some in Ottawa, but actually the majority outside of Ottawa, so it’s a very diverse organization. But a growing one and a strong one, and one that is benefitting from the leadership of people like Faduno who are leading the anti-racism work within our organization.

There is no more important work that we do outside of our core mission, our core mandate, than creating a workplace in which people feel safe, people feel welcome. As Samantha was saying they can bring their whole selves to work. And in which they can flourish. And us you know there are all sorts of reasons why we wanna do that work. Uh uh uh you know you talk about business reasons harnessing people’s potential. Like it’s insane to think that we should leave a whole portion of our workforce only bringing – only enabling them to bring a portion of themselves to work only enabling them to bring a portion of their ability to work.

Nothing makes me feel welcome like being racially attacked and then racially attacked again as “fragile,” when I get mad at being racially attacked. The only thing that makes me feel more welcomed is when these anti-White dipshits start going on a corporate buzzword spree. I personally feel like the sustainability of these new synergies we’re finding in our core competence are allowing us a real human return on investment that, when viewed holistically, enable us to move past some pain points and readjust our alignment to drill down into our human ecosystems. The increased human bandwidth we’re applying to these long standing systemic problems has moved the needle through incentivization and retargetting of hyperlocal logistics.

But there’s also the human side which is the side that I find the most compelling. You know everyday someone is going through uhhhhhh the negative experiences associated with systemic racism. That gets me out of bed in the morning. It it keeps me from going to bed at night some nights but it certainly gets me out of bed in the morning. So being here today with you all is uh exactly the right thing to do it’s exactly where we need to be to be continuing this conversation.

Look how excited this soyboy is at waking up in the morning and hitting new synergistical anti-Whitisms outside of core competency that holistically touch on new human problems that bring us a true return on investment that cannot be measured.

We’ve got work to do, like everyone we’ve got work to do. We’ve started the journey.

Understanding these people as shitty and worthless is the first step to defeating them. They’re middle managers, who have chosen being anti-White as an easy grift. The reason they all sound the same is because there’s like 14 jews in the entire world writing the script for them. They just repeat it.

I’m excited. I want to get out of the way and let Ryan do this thing. White Fragility, uh super interesting issue. Delicate issue for some people but that’s the whole point. That’s the whole idea behind White Fragility. So I’m looking forward to today’s discussion.

Good lord. This guy is apparently a heterosexual who managed to father two children, but you’d never think that listening to his low testosterone soy voice.

And I uh can’t wait to uh hear Ryan’s presentation, see the questions, and hear the discussions. So Ryan, over to you and thank you.

With that he ends it. Our goys asked about 20 questions between us all, and none of them reached moderation, which just shows how full of shit these people are, in case you were wondering.

Next time we begin with failed actor Ryan Trudeau, no relation to PM Justin Trudeau, as he explains how his black son makes him an Aryan genderwarrior.

Categories
Anti-White Canada Enemy Propaganda

Canadian Militaries “White Fragility” AMA – Part 3, WTF is a Layer?

In our last installment we started, but did not finish Samantha Moonsammy’s introduction. You can read that here.

https://youtu.be/zR2KxpEjFlk?t=172

My name is Samantha Moonsammy, and I’d like to share some of my layers with you.

In one of the most asinine things I have ever seen, she immediately follows that up by speaking in French for the next twenty seconds. You’d think she’s just about to repeat what she said, but the next English words out of her mouth are:

But I’m much more than that.

This is some serious bullshit. Why would you structure your speech this way, other than to be a complete and utter twat? Well, luckily, she still explains to us what her “layers,” are.

I am a woman, a mother, a partner, an immigrant. I’m an Indo-Caribbean Canadian. I was born in Guayana South America and immigrated to Canada as a young child. I identify as a woman of colour and have always been proud of that, no matter the obstacles it’s caused me in the public service during my career.

I grew up in the Ottawa area and spent some time in Toronto during my masters degree in communications and culture, and worked and studied in India, China, France, and the Caribbean. These layers, these experiences and so much more are aspects of who I am and the more authentically me I can be the more productive I can be in the workplace.

Look at the insane level of victimhood inversion this anti-White has engineered in its mind. This is someone who brags about traveling the world, getting her masters degree in a useless field, and who has a government sinecure that your taxes pay for where she can spout anti-White hate propaganda. But she’s the real victim. She’s faced vague, never defined “obstacles,” in her career as a brown woman.

Samantha Moonsammy with Oprah

When this oppressed woman isn’t lecturing you on your White Fragility you can find her posing for pictures with Oprah. And celebrating at bullshit awards ceremonies that you’re not invited to, peasant.

So I’d like to thank all our speakers today for being courageous, standing up today, and sharing pieces of themselves with you.

I think these people might die if they stop calling themselves courageous for more than 5 minutes at a time.

I’d also like to acknowledge that today’s conversations may also be difficult… to hear or cause triggers. So please as always, if you or your family members would like to speak to a councillor for immediate support please call the employee assistance program.

I also think they might die if they aren’t told how to immediately get mental health therapy for the slightest bit of non-existant trauma they don’t actually face. This is all part and parcel of their “courageous,” censored conversations, where they pat themselves on the back for racially attacking Whitey.

That’s it for her introduction. Instead she turns to Faduno Ali, one of the coworkers who’s involved in this anti-White hate propaganda. She begins by not realizing that she’s muted, then speaking in French, then finally she says this:

I’d like to… uhm… I’d like to begin by thanking you Samantha and your team. Uhm, and Ady and Matt, for bringing this unprecedented platform to D&D. The Ask Me Anything platform is so crucial to these ongoing uncomfortable, yet necessary, courageous conversations.

Keep in mind that these people censored every single one of the questions that we asked them in this Ask Me Anything. I’m sorry, they courageously cowered in fear while shitting their pants at the thought of a non-supplicating question.

My name is Faduno Ali, and I’m a project of the *inaudible, within the department of National Defense. I too have many layers. Uhm, as a woman of African descent, a mother, a wife, and a muslim. I’m a Somali-Canadian, and grew up here in Ottawa from a young age. I’m happy to be here today to be your cohost Sam, Samantha, and I look forward to an amazing conversation. I’d like to also thank ADM Rob Chambers and Ryan Trudeau for your leadership, and for sharing some of your layers as you’re going to and your privileges in an effort to dismantle racism.

As we proceed with the Ask Me Anything I’d welcome you all to reflect on some of your layers and how we can make our workplaces a safe place to share our layers with one another. I’m gonna pass the mic over to Sam.

The combination of kindergarten talk with anti-White hate propaganda really annoys me. Faduno Ali is also quite far from being a loquacious speaker, saying “uhm,” and pausing far more than I have written previously. This is where your tax dollars are spent.

Anyway, she passes the mic back to Moonsammy, who proceeds in French before saying:

We also have a GC wiki, and a GC collab page that you can join and have many learning tools to accompany today’s live event. You’ll also get an AMA challenge guide. So I’ll challenge you to have a watch party with your teams. Watch this session together and, uhm, have courageous conversations in your workplace and share what you have learned.

When we each take personal responsibility to improve our organizations we break down systemic barriers that have marginalized our equity seeking groups. So this guide can help us take us from passive learning to an active one.

No I think she actually would die if she didn’t refer to herself as courageous every second minute. And again, she talks like a kindergarten teacher while spouting anti-White hate propaganda.

We’re finally done with the introduction. Next time we move on to the guy who, as one of our commentators put it, “seems like he has a personal relationship with his wife’s bull,” Rob Chambers.

Categories
Anti-White Canada Enemy Propaganda

Canadian Militaries “White Fragility” Ask Me Anything – Part 2 – Samantha Moonsammy

A few days ago I wrote up the intro to our series on the Canadian Militaries “White Fragility,” AMA event. You know, the one where they spouted anti-White hate speech and then had a moderator censor all the questions. You can read about that here.

The event started with Samantha Moonsammy doing the intro, which is what we’ll be covering in this article. I didn’t record the first few seconds, but it’s nothing important.

Transcript.

…that includes terminology that may make people feel unsettled and unsure. White Privilege and White Fragility. White Privilege means that your life is not negatively impacted by the colour of your skin. It does not mean that your life’s easy. It does not negate struggles. White Fragility has been identified as the range of reactions that can occur as a result of becoming aware of White Privilege.

These reactions can range from shame to defensiveness, to the extremes of aggression and weaponizing privilege.

In case any of you are retarded, let me translate this to English.

We’re going to be racially attacking Whitey quite a bit here. If you get upset at being racially attacked, we’ve INB4’d that by pretending that there’s something wrong with you psychologically. We’ve also INB4’d anyone who wants to make some argument like “I’ve never gotten anything by being White and who the fuck are you, you privileged little cunt,” by making sure to declare muh brown people face vague, unspecified forces of oppression that don’t apply to you, Whitey.

So you see, there’s nothing wrong about these rich, privileged brown people lecturing you working class stiffs on your imaginary privilege. They had to fight their way through abstract forces of oppression in order to get their cushy sinecure where your taxes pay for them to do anti-White hate propaganda, you privileged Whitey.

And BTW, the idea that White People don’t face any racial discrimination, is absolutely absurd.

Hospitals have been explicitly denying some Covid-19 treatments to White People.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jjj9725JD4I&ab_channel=TheNotoriousDr.

Whitey being racially discriminated against in Healthcare appears to be somewhat new. But racial discrimination in University Admissions has been going on for a long time.

CNBC:

Yale University’s undergraduate admissions process “illegally discriminates” against White and Asian students, the Department of Justice said Thursday.

A two-year investigation into the Ivy League school found that “race is the determinative factor in hundreds of admissions decisions each year,” in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the DOJ said in a press release.

Yale denied the allegation. Karen Peart, a spokeswoman for the university, said in a statement to CNBC that the Justice Department made its conclusions before Yale had provided enough information to show that its practices “absolutely comply with decades of Supreme Court precedent.”

“At Yale, we look at the whole person when selecting whom to admit among the many thousands of highly qualified applicants,” Peart said.

“We are proud of Yale’s admissions practices, and we will not change them on the basis of such a meritless, hasty accusation.”

And of course, Yale fucked up by so openly discriminating against Whitey. The Yale spokesperson is speaking a lot of truth when they say that their explicitly anti-White admissions policy is pretty close to what has been going on in Universities for decades.

ABC News:

In his 2019 lawsuit, David Duvall said he lost his job as senior vice president of marketing and communication at Novant Health due to efforts to diversify top leadership positions, news outlets reported. The jury said Novant Health failed to prove that it would have dismissed Duvall regardless of his race.

And here’s an example from two months ago in the corporate world of a White Man being fired because he was White.

The claim that “you don’t face racial discrimination Whitey,” is just a tactic. It is not a deeply held belief, as evidence by the fact that when confronted with evidence of racial discrimination against White People, these anti-Whites never actually change their politics. Because all of this is just tactics designed to trip you up if you don’t have a ready made example of anti-White racial discrimination. If you ever find yourself in such a position, the rhetoric you should use is as follows.

  1. That’s anti-White hate speech.
  2. Everybody knows that White People face racial discrimination. YOU prove to ME that you don’t believe that.

Never fall for the trick of thinking that these people are acting in good faith. They are 100% bad actors.

However, on our end, gathering examples of anti-White racial discrimination is one of the most productive things we can do. Them pretending that White People never face racial discrimination is actually a pretty good opportunity to show the opposite, which is always nice.

US News:

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A group of Midwestern farmers sued the federal government Thursday alleging they can’t participate in a COVID-19 loan forgiveness program because they’re white.

The group of plaintiffs includes farmers from WisconsinMinnesotaSouth Dakota and Ohio. According to the lawsuit, the Biden administration’s COVID-19 stimulus plan provides $4 billion to forgive loans for socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers who are Black, American Indian, Hispanic, Alaskan native, Asian American or Pacific Islander.

White farmers aren’t eligible, amounting to a violation of the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights, the lawsuit contends.

And if you think that’s a one time thing. Or god forbid, you’re so finkled that you’re doing the “muh DEMONrats,” bit…

Axios:

President Trump unveiled what he calls the “Black Economic Empowerment — Platinum Plan,” at a campaign event in Atlanta, Georgia on Friday, promising to secure more lending for Black-owned businesses if elected for a second term.

The Trump campaign said in a release that federal investments could generate $500 billion in additional capital, generate 3 million new jobs for Black Americans and 500,000 new Black-owned businesses.

And we just had the NJP in Waukesha late November the NJP protesting for anti-White hate crime charges to be placed on Darrell Brooks, the BLM Waukesha Terrorist. You can read about the protest here, and BLMer Darrell Brooks here.

And that’s on top of massive anti-White racial discrimination in censorship by trillion dollar multinationals as lead by the (((ADL))), and a myriad of other things. Frankly, these anti-White propagandists even saying “Whitey you’re privileged,” is itself racial discrimination against White People.

But of course, Moonsammy said “negatively impacted,” not “racially discriminated against.” These people use this type of language because it leaves the door open to then argue that White People being racially discriminated against doesn’t count as “negatively impacted,” because something something historical oppression something something addressing inequality. Honestly though, those arguments are so complicated and obviously anti-White it doesn’t really matter.

Back to the video.

Today we are thrilled to invite some outstanding public servants to the Ask Me Anything stage to talk about these powerful and definitely courageous subjects.

We are not even a minute into this.

The very first part of the stream cut out, so you’ll see some ~2-5 second pauses. Luckily, that’s only a problem in this video, and fairly minor. Nothing of interest is missed, just some generic “so happy to be here with you,” platitudes, but like the above. As one example of what she was blabbing on about.

These ask me anything events provide you with an opportunity to increase your perspective. As we say, let’s up that EQ! And to learn from the lived experiences of individuals who are bravely sharing their experiences to help educate and move the public service towards a culture where equity is embedded.

We are simply going to need more eyerolling memes to get through this goyim. This is what I mean when I say I don’t even know what’s worse, the full court anti-White hate propaganda, or this “how do I say all the privileged class cliches in the same sentence,” attempt? It’s like she’s doing a speedrun of dipshit slogans, 100% edition. And she even threw her first into the air after she said “Let’s up that EQ.”

Let’s up that EQ!

So we want you to know, you are not alone. These experiences, especially the negative ones, are systemic, and happen all too frequently throughout the public service.

Citation most definitely needed for the claim that muh brown people are being super oppressed in the Canadian bureaucracy. Although they always just go to more and more trivial shit. 2

The objective is that by shining the light, is to continually increase the network of public servants ready to take action and move towards a culture of inclusivity and belonging.

My name is Samantha Moonsammy, and I’d like to share some of my layers with you.

We are not even three minutes in. Literally not even three minutes in and she’s finally introducing herself AND her layers, whatever the fuck that means. I mean I know, I watched another hour and a half of this anti-White clown fiesta, but we’ll have to say that for part 2, because this is already getting too long.

This series is going to be getting an update every day. Stay tuned.

Categories
Anti-White Canada Current Events

Canadian Military’s “White Fragility” Ask Me Anything – Part 1

At this point, I can’t even remember what tipped me off that this was happening, but in any case, the Canadian Military put on an online “White Fragility,” Ask me Anything event on December 15th, that I recorded. I initially wrote about this here, and was planning on getting some Canadian goys to hop in there with me and ask these people the type of questions that they don’t want to answer. Then we learnt that there would be a moderator who decided which questions got to be public.

Well, in any case, I still got in there, and was joined by two others, Jim Northpoint, and Tyranosphobic Rekt. We sat through the whole thing, asked our questions which didn’t get answered, and I got the footage. I really wouldn’t recommend watching this entire one and a half hour video that I got of the event, since I’ll be breaking down the relevant parts into their own articles, but here it is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1jCoix4kXk&ab_channel=TheNotoriousDr.

Today, I’ll just be giving you the overview. 

The video starts with this broad, Samantha Moonsammy, who I swear is like a parody of some anti-White brown shitlib. She makes sure to throw in that this is a “courageous conversation,” and talk about her “layers,” as a brown immigrant almost as often as she actually bothers to spout out anti-White hate propaganda. Her delivery is smooth, and well practiced, which is not surprising, considering she’s a professional anti-White that your taxes fund. 

Samantha Moonsammy (they/them)

We then see a brief interlude of Rob Chambers.

Rob Chambers (xir/xor)

Almost the first words out of this faggot’s mouth is the following.

Before I start I have to give a big thanks to Samantha and Fiduno and to your teams for all the work that you do in this space. You know the uh, committment, the courage, the endurance that it takes to do what you do is… is very very humbling. You’re certainly leading by example. So uh, thank you very very much for that.

I’m not even sure if the anti-White hate propaganda bothers me more than these fucking worthless future lampshades talking about their immense courage and mythical work ethic. It’s both together that make the whole package, topped off with this weak faggots total lack of masculinity and effeminate whining.

To quote Jim Northpoint, who was in the call with us, “you really get the sense that Rob Chambers has a personal relationship with his wife’s bull.”

Anyway, just about 13 minutes in, and we get to Ryan Trudeau. The failed actor who, according to his IMDB bio “is handsome, passionate, and eyeing nothing short of a very successful and prominent acting career.” 

Well needless to say that never happened, but he does anti-White hate propaganda for the Canadian Military now, which is why he’s here.

Ryan Trudeau (he/him)

I was starting to wonder if Trudeau had AIDS. His face did have a gaunt look, but some people are just like that. Whether AIDS ridden of POZ-free, the queer is the absolute pinnacle of “just say every privileged class buzzword out there,” and then some. It was a real tossup between anus hungry sodomite in it for the cause, and typical self-serving narcissistic shitlib with this being just his personal grift.

Or at least it was until I saw this picture. Then I got it, buddy over here’s been oil drilling. I don’t know if he was a shitlib before he got hooked on the jungle pussy, but he certainly is now.

You hear a lot about “how so and so got redpilled,” stories in our thing. This goy’s personal journey is like the exact opposite of that. It’s a “how I got bluepilled,” story, complete with marvel movies and “privilege acknowledge” rituals. Oh trust me goy, it’s wild. 

After about 50 minutes, the presentation is over. They spend the next 35 minutes asking questions. I personally wrote 8 questions, none of which made it to the public chat. I wrote other questions for Northpoint and Tyranosphobic Rekt, and they came up with some of their own. Only one of their questions actually got through, and was removed after five minutes. So all in all, about 1 in 20 questions got through, and only temporary. It was not answered.

The questions that did get through were the “how can I be a better ally to people of colour,” type questions. So instead of “ask me anything,” it was more like “ask me the types of fake struggle session questions we pretend to ask each other on our non-censored twatter accounts.” Of course, we expected that going in, but it’s always nice to force them to delegitimize the entire concept of their own “ask me anything” event.

As promised, I will be writing up multiple articles in a series on this. Stay tuned.