Department of Justice memo can be found here. Let me just quote from the very first sentence.

 In 1955, Emmett Till, a 14-year-old Black youth visiting family in Mississippi, was murdered by white men after XXXXX claimed that Till had propositioned her.

Yes that’s right goy, the US Department of Justice officially does not capitalize the White in White Men/People, but does capitalize the Black in Black Men/People. 

In case you think this is an isolated event, or a mistake, let me quote the entire intro, written by Attorney Angela M. Miller, with the important parts bolded.

In 1955, Emmett Till, a 14-year-old Black youth visiting family in Mississippi, was murdered by white men after XXXXX claimed that Till had propositioned her. Till, who was from Chicago, Illinois, visited relatives near Money, Mississippi, during the summer of 1955. On August 24 of that year, he entered XXXX’s Grocery & Meat Market and had an interaction with XXXXX, XXXXX. Accounts differ as to precisely what happened during that encounter. Black witnesses who had accompanied Till to the store reported—both near the time of the incident and more recently—that Till’s behavior was limited to whistling at XXXXX as she left the store. XXXXX, however, alleged that Till was physically aggressive towards her and that he propositioned her. What is clear from all accounts is that XXXXX suffered no physical harm and that Till’s conduct was likely perceived by many in the white community to violate their unwritten code, prevalent in the Jim Crow South, that Black men were forbidden from initiating interactions with white women. Four days later, Till was forcibly abducted from his relatives’ home by at least two men. His brutally beaten body was found three days later in the Tallahatchie River. Because there did not appear to be a basis for federal jurisdiction given the limited scope of the civil rights statutes in effect in 1955, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) did not investigate Till’s murder at that time. Mississippi state authorities, however, arrested two men:  XXXXX’s XXXX, Roy Bryant, and XXXX, John William (J.W.) Milam. They were indicted for murder and tried by a local, all-white jury, which quickly acquitted them. Following their acquittal, the men admitted to a journalist that they murdered Till in part because of his earlier actions toward XXXXX. Both Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam are now deceased.

Let me take a quick look at who this Angela M. Miller creature is.

She’s the obese wahman who was formerly the “Chief of Staff, Assistant Chancellor for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, Chief Diversity Officer.” So basically she’s a professional anti-White. These are the people who are in the Department of Justice. Fat professional anti-White activists. 

The Emmett Till trial, or rather the trial for the White Men who killed him, is a pioneering example of jew nationalist, anti-White activism. While this is not the site for going into the details, Emmett Till absolutely did assault a White Woman, despite what anti-White activists would claim.

Well, speaking of anti-White activists, one of them, Timothy Tyson, pictured above, wrote a book in 2017 with the explosive revelation that the woman assaulted by Emmett Till lied about being sexually assaulted by him. And she admitted this to him.

I certainly believe Timothy Tyson. He has a very trustworthy face, and does not appear politically or racially motivated in the slightest.

If you’re wondering, Wikipedia Early Life returns nothing, but come on now.


The DoJ reopened the case in 2018 after a book cast doubt on the testimony of a white woman who was central to the case.

Carolyn Bryant Donham said Emmett had grabbed her by the waist, uttered a profanity and asked her for a date while she was alone in the family grocery store on the evening of 24 August 1955 in Money, Mississippi.

But a 2017 best-selling book, The Blood of Emmett Till, by historian Timothy Tyson, quoted her as recanting this story.

The author said she had indicated – in her first ever known interview – that her courtroom testimony six decades earlier about Emmett’s purported sexual advance was unfounded.

However, the DoJ said in a statement on Monday that the FBI had interviewed Ms Donham, and she had denied ever disavowing her testimony, and did not provide any further information.

They added that authorities concluded there was “insufficient evidence to prove that she ever told the professor [Mr Tyson] that any part of her testimony was untrue”.

“Although the professor represented that he had recorded two interviews with her, he provided the FBI with only one recording, which did not contain any recantation.”

I’m not sure I can contain my level of shock here. This anti-White political activist just… made something up out of whole cloth to slander a White Woman. How could that be?

The statement added: “The professor also provided inconsistent explanations about whether the missing recording included the alleged recantation or whether, instead, the woman made the key admission before he began recording the interview.”

Officials also said there was nothing to validate the claim that Ms Donham had disavowed her story in any transcript of Mr Tyson’s interviews.

The author quotes Ms Donham in the book as saying: “That part’s not true. Nothing that boy did could ever justify what happened to him.”

But the DoJ said even in the author’s account it was unclear what Ms Donham was referring to when she was quoted as saying “that part’s not true”.

Ms Donham’s daughter-in-law, Marsha Holley Bryant, was present for the two tape-recorded interviews with Mr Tyson, and she said in 2018 that Ms Donham had never recanted.

I just don’t understand how such a trustworthy face could produce such lies? It’s almost like he’s got this anti-White agenda he’s pushing. But why?

He said in an email to the New York Times: “Carolyn started spilling the beans before I got the recorder going. I documented her words carefully.”

He added: “My reporting is rock solid.”

He said in an email to NBC News: “I am standing in the public square telling the truth as I see it based on solid evidence.”

You heard it folks. The White Woman really did confess to lying on the stand, but he just didn’t have the recording equipment up and ready for absolutely no reason. So there’s no evidence, but you should really trust this honourable man who does not have a political agenda.

Remember, people who have to make up slanders of White People that get pushed by multibillion dollar propaganda outlets and the US Department of Justice don’t have time to appeal to the “consciences of the oppressor.”

We might do a breakdown of the Emmett Till case one day. 

You may also like

1 Comment

  1. […] Yesterday we covered the story of how Timothy “suspected, but no wiki early life” Tyson made up a slander of Carolyn Bryant, the White Woman who claimed the rapist Emmett Till assaulted her. You can read that story here. […]

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Anti-White