CTV:
Pierre Poilievre knows how to laugh. I heard it myself.
On Monday Poilievre was asked to react to Jean Charest’s “attack,” calling him a career politician with no real life experience. Poilievre let out a belly laugh and simply remarked that Charest was elected to Parliament in…1984!
Charest may have lots of skills today but he didn’t have two lines on his CV when he was first elected. For him to be calling Poilievre a career politician was indeed laughable.
Tom Mulcair
This article is written by Tom Mulcair, the former leader of the federal NDP from 2012-2017. You’d think he’d be taking potshots at “the other side,” in this article, but, since electoral politics is completely fake and ghey, he’s not. That’s why the tone of this piece is cheerful and praising.
The race to become the sixth Conservative leader in seven years is shaping up to be a lot more fun than the previous races that produced Scheer and O’Toole as cannon fodder for Trudeau’s Liberals.
Who could forget Scheer the Queer. The most homosexual faggot in congress was the chosen cucklet destined to lose against The Spoilt Cunt Formerly Known as Justin.
To begin with, Poilievre is young, energetic and driven. That will serve him well over the next six months as he traverses the country constantly. I went through a lengthy campaign to succeed Jack Layton and know first hand just how gruelling the exercise is. Canada is indeed huge and in a leadership race, you have to get into every nook and cranny to meet, greet and sell memberships.
Yes, who can forget Pierre Pollievre, the career politician with a heart of gold, who’s bravely taking on the elites. Now. All of a sudden. Like, he’s spent his entire working life doing things for his donors, but he’s really against them all of a sudden.
Poilievre was in Quebec last weekend and did well. When you get 200 people in a hall in Trois-Rivières, you’ve generated some interest in your campaign.
He hold this in a synagogue?
Poilievre doesn’t shy away from controversy and when asked about meeting anti-vaxxers, reverts to a “good people on both sides” argument.
The cuckletservative party is having an epic battle, mirroring in scale and casualties the Russia-Ukraine war in the Donbas. No, more than that. This is at least Vietnam, and probably more like Korea. Fuck it, I think we’re going all the way to Napoleonesque mass starvation deaths in the masturbation camps of Auschwitz.
The battle is for the future of the cuckletservative party, nay, the cuckletservative spirit. The question they are having is, fundamentally, are they going to be a party that pretends to be token opposition to Neo-Fuedal Bolshevekism or are they just not even going to pretend to be here to do a single thing for the little peasants. A vote for Pollievre is a vote for pretend milquetoast populism, a vote for Charest is a vote for just being more honest about sucking donor cocks dry.
It’s a really important battle. You should be very invested in this.
Poilievre will be able to count on a lot of second choice votes from Leslyn Lewis supporters. She is staunchly anti-abortion and will reel in large numbers of votes from social conservatives and some church groups. If she fails to progress through the successive ballot counts, most of her votes would stay on the right side of the ledger and favour Poilievre, who gets a political two for one. He’ll get her votes but won’t have to get ensnared in the trap that caught Scheer. Unlike Scheer, Poilievre will be able to avoid committing too heavily and won’t have to pander to the anti-choice voters.
You mean “do what the pro-life voters want”, right faggot? This has got to be one of the lamest attempts at reframing I have ever read.
Also, note how he’s literally pointing out, if you read between the lines, that Pollievre is cynically doing the “muh lesser of two evils,” inside of the cuckletservative party. He’s not anti-abortion, he just wants you to think that. And no, goy, you’re not getting policy here, so what’s the point.
Poilievre will be able to count on a lot of second choice votes from Leslyn Lewis supporters. She is staunchly anti-abortion and will reel in large numbers of votes from social conservatives and some church groups. If she fails to progress through the successive ballot counts, most of her votes would stay on the right side of the ledger and favour Poilievre, who gets a political two for one. He’ll get her votes but won’t have to get ensnared in the trap that caught Scheer. Unlike Scheer, Poilievre will be able to avoid committing too heavily and won’t have to pander to the anti-choice voters.
Maxime Bernier is a gigantic faggot, who still has a twatter account because he’s a fake populist. Having said that, there’s no question in my mind that he won the Cuckletservative nomination, which is why they literally burned the ballots the day after the election. And that was in addition to getting huge turnout from some farmers who were angry about Bernier’s planned cancellation of the Wheat and Dairy boards.
What will be the most interesting to watch is who aligns with whom.
Tom Mulcair, again.
I actually unironically agree with this. This little cuckfight is going to be entertaining, and I’m going to be enjoying every second of this. I’m also going to be covering it in excruciating detail, for political ammunition of course.
When MP Scott Aitchison launched his campaign he said he was running because he was fed up with partisan bickering and political games and said what was missing was leadership. One can be forgiven for assuming that the master stuntman, Pierre Poilievre, was in Aitchison’s crosshairs.
MP Scott Aitchison.
Why is every little cuckservative a soy-faced monstrosity? Why are they all so ugly, and yet, not in like a masculine way. I’m not even gay but jesus help me.
This race really is a battle for the heart and soul of a Janus-faced Party and the past leaders of its two philosophical sides could help decide its future. If and when Brian Mulroney and Stephen Harper declare, that battle will have been joined in earnest.
Stephen Harper is expected to declare? This is turning into a clusterfuck of epic proportions.
And wait a second, Brian Mulroney? Wasn’t he that guy who was PM in, like, 1984???
This goy reminds me of the pedo pope…
He’s 83 years old. This has to be satire, right? This Mulcair fag is just pulling our legs. That has to be it.
Charest would love to get Mulroney’s support and be seen as his potential successor in forming a majority Conservative government. Their relationship has not always been an easy one and it remains to be seen whether the old warhorse can be prevailed upon by their many mutual, and influential, friends to give his paternal blessing.
Oh, okay. So he’s just throwing around his “support,” then. That makes more sense. Let’s see who else this faggot has supported.
So this complete and utter whore for the (((parasite class))) is bragging about helping Joffrey Trudeau. And this is someone who these little cucklets are just thrilled about being endorsed by.
This would be a lot more confusing if you didn’t understand that they all simply exist to serve their donors.
Harper is another matter. His disdain not only for Charest but for all that he represents is a matter of record. Harper scuppered the Progressive Conservatives because they were an anathema. The mushy middle is not for him. Harper is unlikely to remain silent, especially if it appears that Charest has a chance of beating Poilievre.
True Blue Stephen Harper. Remember him. You know, that guy who, uh, tripled immigration and did literally nothing socially “conservative,” in his entire tenure? You remember, right?
Another major leadership candidate, Patrick Brown scored a major coup when he received the backing of highly respected MP Michelle Rempel Garner. Deeply experienced, brilliant in debate and highly personable, she will bring a lot to his campaign. She can be expected to help Brown with his communications lines and in debate prep.
Michelle Rempel Garner, MP – Conservative
Hmmm. I distinctly remember writing about this anti-White cunt on my previous site. Let me see if I remember –
Right. Here’s a highly respected Conservative Party MP pushing anti-White hate propaganda, as well as using terms like “cis/straight.” Let me go ahead and transcribe that for you.
Yes. I humble myself and ask forgiveness, and seek to make things right.
I have privilege; I am cis/straight/white. But I am also a woman who works in a system dominated by white maleness.
But no excuses. I will do what I can. That is all I can do, but it is much.
Patrick Brown
Imagine a political party where they’re tripping over themselves to get the endorsements of faggots who help Justin Trudeau for free, as well as anti-White human garbage pronoun warriors like Michelle Rempel Garner. Well, you don’t have to imagine anymore.
Tuesday’s agreement between Trudeau and Singh would put the next federal election in October 2025.
It creates a double advantage for Poilievre. He gets to slag the Liberals for turning “hard left” and, if he wins, he gets three years to hone his pitch in the House and prepare.
I’m sure Charest quickly understood what the Liberal-NDP agreement meant for him. I’m willing to bet the Liberal braintrust took it into account when they pushed for this deal.
I’m sure Charest quickly understood what the Liberal-NDP agreement meant for him. I’m willing to bet the Liberal braintrust took it into account when they pushed for this deal.
Charest doesn’t even have a seat in the House. He’d be stuck spending three and a half years roaming the hallways like Banquo’s ghost. Not a great career plan for someone banking on a quick shot at becoming PM. He’s an incredible campaigner and no one should count him out, but this isn’t what he’d bargained for.
Jean Charest
Finally Tom Mulcair has an actual insight that isn’t coated in a layer of soy. It is logistically difficult for Charest. This faggot has to just sort of chill for four years if he wins the nomination, and just kind of do nothing for a while. Pollievre can do the Trey Gowdy “gettin’ to da bottom o’ dis,” routine while never getting to da bottom o’ that. He’s in the perfect position for a servative. He gets to whine a lot, while ultimately not having to push forward policy.
Look, I don’t know about you, but I’m pumped.
