In the comments under my piece on the WEF anti-White clown Winifred Byanyima notable commenter Dane left the following.
Aeronautical engineer, at least in Winnifred’s case, is kind of like calling a garbage man a “sanitation engineer.”
Winnie worked as a flight engineer for Uganda Airlines for a few years before going off -ahem- “fighting” in some bush war rebellion. Btw, a flight engineer doesn’t fly or co-pilot a jet. Instead, Winnie monitored a panel providing engine and a other flight systems information. Winnie’s career was obsolete when her occupation was computerized.
Winnie did no actual engineering. Instead, her occupation suffered from the proliferation of corporate bullshit buzzwords, where she “engineered,” flights by somewhat organizing them. It’s basically the grown up version of when you wrote that you “managed,” social interactions and personality conflicts when you were thirteen and applying for a job.
Anyhow, Winnie was given advanced training in engineering, at great tax payer expense; and like most wahmen, did dick all with it. No bridges. No factories. No roads. Nada. So much for roi.
Instead, and like so many wahmen professionals she makes a living complaining about the patriarchy, wyte pipo oppression, etc. Just another sickening parasite.
We may be far from power, but if bias confirmation is your thing there’s no better place than the Daily Rake. I could have guessed that she didn’t engineer diddly squat, but Dane did the actual work and confirmed that yes, she’s not exactly responsible for the fly by wire systems on modern fighter jets. In fact she’s not responsible for anything.
But it’s Cave Johnson’s comment that’s prompted this piece.
Anything involving Uganda and engineering is a hoot. Here’s a recent one, an actor from “Empire” who made a visit to the Ugandan government to talk to them about his theories of math and shit.
This is either going to be really good, or really fake.
He stated that while studying chemical engineering at the Pratt Institute in Brooklyn in the early ’90s, he found an “inconsistency with the math there. I went out to explore a new way of understanding how the universe works, and I was able to define the grand unified field equation they’ve been looking for and put it into geometry. With that geometry, I was able to put props on that.”
“I was able to put props on that,” is what the Wakandian who actually discovered gravity said to Isaac Newton, his slave master, when Newton stole credit for his discoveries.
If you go to his personal website, he will explain to you that 1×1=2. Yes, 1^2 = 2
Okay, there’s absolutely no way that he’d be –
The above screencap is taken from his personal site. Here’s what the homepage looks like.
For a long time I thought to myself that this was too good to be true. After all, there are lots of people named Terrence Howard. Could this Empire actor really be the same Terrence Howard who thinks that 1×1 == 2, and gravity isn’t real?
Alrighty goyim, place your bets. Do you think he’s going to unveil some beyond retarded scheme for actual flight? Do you think that he’s going to say that he can get really high (on drugs) and then do some weird negro “intellectualism,” whereby that counts as flying? Do you think something else? Take a minute, pause, and really try to get into the mind of this Wakandian genius.
He stated that while studying chemical engineering at the Pratt Institute in Brooklyn in the early ’90s, he found an “inconsistency with the math there. I went out to explore a new way of understanding how the universe works, and I was able to define the grand unified field equation they’ve been looking for and put it into geometry. With that geometry, I was able to put props on that.“
Is that right, Terrence? While studying chemical engineering you just so happened to notice a discrepancy with the math in theoretical physics. You then defined the grand unified field theory equation and “put it in some geometry.” And yet, despite doing all this, the bigotphobic supremacists of Whiteness at the Nobel Committee have yet to recognize your immense contributions to our understanding of the universe. I truly am ashamed of my race.
“And what I’m saying is now we have invented a new form of flight that I would like to bring here to Uganda to replace the drones, to replace the helicopters, to replace the planes. We have all the funding necessary, what we need is just a fertile ground in which to build this,” he continued.
Well first of all Terrence, there are three methods of flight. Lighter than air, as in zeppelins, fixed wing, as in planes, and rotary wing, as in helicopters. Drones are not a method of flight. The quadcopters are rotary craft, and the toy models that children play with are often fixed wing. So it’s a bit redundant for you to label drones specifically as something getting replaced by this new form of flight, but you’re the genius here, not me.
Howard said that his technology uses the “geometry of hydrogen” and involves “unlimited” hydrogen bonding.
“The Lynchpins are now able to behave as a swarm, as a colony, that can defend a nation, that can harvest food, that can remove plastics from the ocean, that can give the children of Uganda and the people of Uganda an opportunity to spread this and sell these products throughout the world,” the actor said, referencing a project in which he partnered with entrepreneur Andrew Sobko to create a new type of drone known as The Lynchpin.
I love how we just transitioned from “we’re using the geometry of hydrogen to create flight,” to “the lynchpins will be responsible for national defense.” Look, I get that if you’re convinced you did the math as an undergraduate and solved the grand unified field theory equations, an achievement worth two or three Nobel prizes, then maybe you can just assume that in addition to creating a new method of flight, you’ve also created artificial intelligence for these “lynchpins,” that can turn them into hyperintelligent national defense… things.
Emma Watson, who is sitting on my lap right now as I write this, had some choice words for Terrence Howard. Specifically she said,
Get a load of this dumb nigger. – Emma Watson
I was going to go ahead and point out that even if Terrence actually created the AI required to have his little drones fly, you’d still need an energy source to get all those little “lynchpins,” flying around. But then I realized that he probably thinks he also invented free energy and cold fusion and all of that, so really who knows? Perhaps Emma’s grug take was the best take.
I found this “Lynchpin Technology Illustrations,” on his website. I almost have no word to explain this. It starts off with jazz music playing as Terrence narrates.
You see in every relationship, there’s this factor of least interest involved. Meaning the person least interested in maintaining it will dominate because they won’t compromise.
Think about it.
And you have plenty of time to think about it, because there is literally no narration for the rest of the ten minute video. Trust me, I watched the whole thing on 2x speed. His technology demo is him talking about how his ex-wife was a bitch or something, followed by a bunch of random images.
I lied earlier when I said that he doesn’t say anything else. Around six minutes in he randomly goes “yeah.” That’s it, now it’s back to more random science-y pictures while some music plays in the background.
I honestly cannot describe how otherworldly this is. This is not regular stupidity, it’s something truly special.
I’d like to know how many kilograms of cocaine Terrence was doing when coming up with this… technology. Speaking of which, I still have no idea what it even is. The video description is the following.
The following models are gravity free particle physics simulations and are not animations nor CGI graphics in the standard sense as there are no “keyframe animations” present.
All of the forces being used are externally applied vortexes only and limited uses of central or offset magnetic fields. There are no other internal attraction forces present in the simulations.
And? Also I don’t think that Howard knows what “vortex,” means.
They are using emulated particles of specified masses in conjunction with specific externally applied forces, harmonic resonance and emulated magnetic fields only.
Terence, what the fuck are you even talking about?
The vortex spiral forces, similar to tornado simulations are arranged using Terrence Howard’s “Lynchpin” configuration where the basic form has four vortexes Poynting to a common centre point.
Poynting to a common centre point? I’d forgive that as a typo, except that the y key is two over from the i key. So no, that was a deliberate choice by Terrence. Or as he would but it, a delyberate choyce, because that shows how smart he is.
He probably did this because a “poynting,” vector is an actual thing. Except that he has no idea what it actually is, and thinks it’s the Science!y way to say “pointing.”
The secondary group or 3 vortexes are radially offset at 120 degree intervals and tilted at 109.5 degrees relative to 1 primary vertical vortex perpendicular to the group of three secondary vortexes for a total of 4 per Lynchpin grouping.
We’re not even halfway done with the YouTube description and I’m ending this. It doesn’t get any more coherent or reality based than what we’ve covered thus far. But that’s just because we’re not genius Wakandians who have invented a new form of flight, as well as hyper genius artificial intelligence, free energy, the equations for the grand unified theory of everything, and a whole bunch of other things Terrence has invented, but is too modest to brag about.
Luckily, Terrence has decided to “enlighten” us mortals his new form of math, where one times one equals two. Since the image above is pretty small, I’ll transcribe this for us all.
4/2 is the inverse operation of 2 x 2 = 4
it would naturally follow that
2/1 is the inverse operation of 1 x 1 = 2
Terrence, you didn’t prove to everyone that 1 x 1 = 2 yet. I can grant you the premise that if 1 x 1 really did equal 2 then 2 / 1 would in fact equal 1. But you can’t just have us all accept this as some axiom before you actually prove anything.
What does your common sense tell you about these two scenarios?
What do they have in common and what are their differences?
The number four is divided by two, twice.
and the truth is:
The number two is divided by one, twice
Terrence here is really giving us the secret information that the Wakandian Mayans found, forcing us Europeans to travel through time and space and genocide them all. He’s definitely not just a low IQ coke addict with serious delusions of grandeur.
Can you see where the mistake has occurred?
Well it’s a good thing that Terrence is here to enlighten us, free of charge I might add, since the answer is that no, I cannot. I have no idea where the error in “1 x 1 = 1” occurred, because it looks about as right as “poynting,” is wrong.
Both of these scenarios are identical in every way.
I do like Terrence’s usage of “scenarios.” This is how the real mathematicians, the oppressed Wakandians of blackness, taught math for three million years before the White Folx came over. “Ayo in dis scenario it’s like equivalent brotha so we be buildin’ dem skyscrapers and shieeet.”
The only difference exists in dimension alone. If they ADD, SUBTRACT and DIVIDE according to the same ratio then they must also MULTIPLY according to the same ratio, plain and simple!
Yet, the Math and Scientific community tells us that common sense and logic are wrong in this case because of a product of an arbitrary convention called the Identity property
This is it, he’s done it. Get him literally every Nobel prize for the next ten years. Get him every Field medal for the rest of his life. That may be quite some time, since I’m sure he’s also inventing living forever, but in that case he just deserves it more.
“I may be climbing on rainbows, but baby here goes!”
It should never occur, that the square root of a given number when added to itself produces a result greater than the initial number squared. For that would expose a loose thread within the fabric of mathematics. A “loose thread” capable of unraveling the very ground rules of mathematics and consequently insuring the collapse of any system that is based upon its foundation.
Confidently asserting something is not the same thing as scientific proof, Terrence. It’s totally fine for the square root of a number, when doubled, to be greater than the original number. This is true for literally every single number and fraction lower than two, and isn’t unique to one. The problem is not that the fundamental laws of first grade mathematics are wrong, the problem is that you are a dumb negro with a cocaine addiction and delusions of grandeur. Speaking of which…
I have been told by many that the releasing of this truth may pose certain challenges in my life. For there are many institutions that this truth will be viewed as disruptive to their system of profit and gains. I want to live a happy and peaceful life and I pray for longevity. Not just for me, but for our entire species. Know that I would never harm myself, nor anyone else for that matter. Nevertheless, if my life has to face certain challenges so that this planet can be saved, please do not let these trials that I may have to face be in vain and pray for me as I am praying for you.
Terrence DaShon Howard
May 25th, 2019
Give it up for DaShon. He took a break from starring next to Jussie “Nigerian KKKers attacked me” Smollett to save our entire species by not understanding math as well as a typical third grader, despite studying chemical engineering. In addition to developing hydrogen powered spaceflight, disproving gravity, inventing swarm AI, free energy, and creating the “lynchpin,” unmanned Ugandian Defense Force. Now imagine how much nicer the planet would be if these genius Black Bodies were not constantly oppressed by White Supremacy.